similar to: What's happening now here?

Hello list. I'm posting here although I'm actually running rsync from within rsnapshot, but the problem is really rsync-related. I've set up remote backups: remote client to backup from is Windows Server 2003 with sshd and rsyncd running, local server is Debian Linux (Lenny) with rsnapshot configured to use an ssh tunnel. My command line is this one: ssh -f

Vijesti iz svijeta piramida najaktivnije arheolo?ke lokacije na svijetu Mjese?ni izvje?taj za august 2014. donosi: - Legendarni Graham Hancock na bosanskim piramidama - Potvr?ena veza izme?u podzemnih tunela i piramida - Briljantni profesor Konstantin Mejl o Podzemnom labirintu Ravne - Energetska zraka na vrhu Bosanske piramide Sunca - Konferencija ?Skrivena

Hello, No ttyUSB* device under /dev however the new driver has detected the UPS, the nut services are able to start, just "upsc -l ups" sais unknown error and doesn't return any information. Could be due to the driver unable to detect number of battery packs as reported by the nut-driver.service startup? How can I fix that? root at omv:~# systemctl status nut-driver.service●

Hello everybody. I got a strange problem, which I hope to solve with your help. I'm doing "remote backups" using rsync in an ssh tunnel. In the last setup I realized, something is driving me crazy and I can't find *what* the problem is. I managed to successfully login via ssh in a "passwordless" way (by means of RSA-keys). After this step is done and I'm logged

Hello, Replaced UPS Kstar Micropower Micro 1200 (managed via blazer_usb) with https://www.njoy.ro/UPS/horus-plus-2000. The latter doesn't seem to be supported. 1. I tried blazer_usb and usbhid-ups. Any other suggestions? 2. What would be needed to get it supported by NUT? ======== HW ======== HP Microserver Gen 8 ======== UPS ======== Working:Kstar Micropower Micro

Hi Virtualizers, I just setup a CentOS 6 box (at home) to run as a KVM host. It's replacing an absolutely ancient CentOS 5 server that's running Xen. I have one OS drive, and two drives in RAID 1 with LVM on top which is being used as the KVM storage pool. I created a KVM that will run OpenMediaVault (OMV). OMV requires an OS drive (which is really a LVM), and a separate drive(s) to

Hello list. I've got following: rsync: opendir "client05" (in Profili) failed: Permission denied (13) rsync: delete_file: rmdir(client02/SendTo) failed: Permission denied (13) Am I correct if I say that the "opendir" is related to the source I'm trying to rsync, but the "delete_file" is related to the destination? Flavio Boniforti PIRAMIDE INFORMATICA

Hy people, where could this be coming from? rsync: send_files failed to open "Alfredo Polti SA/wz_ALFREDO_POLTI_SA.ac0" (in Winway_z-32): Device or resource busy (16) rsync: send_files failed to open "Alfredo Polti SA/wz_ALFREDO_POLTI_SA.ac3" (in Winway_z-32): Device or resource busy (16) rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code 23) at

Hello there, is it a known issue/problem with rsync transferring big files (let's say over 0,5 GB)? I'm using "rsync -rtz" to transfer over an SSH tunnel and I always get 12 Error in rsync protocol data stream Any suggestions on how to solve this? Maybe removing "z" compression could be helping? At this regard: how does compression work? When is it done? I mean, are

Hi, I'm working hard to setup winbind and openLDAP work together with TLS My networks contains: - a windows server 2008 R2 domain controller - a debian 6 based file server (openmediavault v0.4) running OpenLDAP 2.4.23 and Samba v3.5.6 - a debian 7 computer running winbind 3.6.6 I want to let OpenLDAP store SID <=> uig/gid mapping to ensure constant uid and gid for users on all linux

On 20/05/2019 19:47, Hendrik Friedel wrote: > Hello, > >>>> You posted this: >>>> I am using Openmediavault (debian based NAS distribution), which is >>>> not actively supporting btrfs >>>> It is this that I was referring to. >>> Ah, yes. >>> OMV intended to move to btrfs as the only choice with the next >>>

Hello, >> In my impression: Yes. Also, this problem seems to affect also zfs and > > I'm mostly interested in the claim that ZFS is affected. > I haven't followed this thread carefully, but what exactly is the problem we're > talking about, and how do we know it impacts ZFS? > [Something more than a single one-liner in that bug report?] Indeed, I only find

On 20/05/2019 18:54, Hendrik Friedel wrote: > Hello, > >> Is btrfs becoming more common ? > In my impression: Yes. Also, this problem seems to affect also zfs and > thus all (?) file systems that support checksums and scrubbing in > linux; consequently all filesystems that are the choice of users who > need this for ensuring data consistency. Not from my experience, but,

put map untrusted to domain = yes in smb.conf and strarted winbind. Now work !!!  nice -n '-20'  yes 'thanks a lot' Buda Il 11/01/19 10:56, Christian Naumer via samba ha scritto: > How about setting: > > map untrusted to domain = yes > > The default changed here. But it would still help if we could see the > smb.conf as the big difference with 4.8 is that

Hello, >>>You posted this: >>>I am using Openmediavault (debian based NAS distribution), which is not actively supporting btrfs >>>It is this that I was referring to. >>Ah, yes. >>OMV intended to move to btrfs as the only choice with the next version. In order to pave the way, I intended to be an early adopter. The problem I report here, that there is good

I gave you the most simple option. And the difference is. myserverdomain\username works only on that server. (myserverdomain) .\username works on any server where the loginname and password are the same. There is NO other option for you that i know off. (sorry) Yes.. the other option is, setup an AD domain. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba

Hello, I am try to get my "new" UPS running with NUT on my OpenMediaVault device but only receive error meassages on several configurations I try. Your support is really appreciated for getting it solved. Best Regards, Olaf *lsusb* Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID

How about setting: map untrusted to domain = yes The default changed here. But it would still help if we could see the smb.conf as the big difference with 4.8 is that winbind needs to run now. This might also do something like this. Regards Christian Am 11.01.19 um 10:46 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > I gave you the most simple option. > > And the difference is. >

Hi Stuart, I am using OpenMedaVault and purchased the Tripp-Lite SMART1300LCDT. I can't get it to work with OMV. Any ideas for me? I posted a request on the OMV community but no answers. Any direction would be appreciated. Thanks, Roman -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Nov 4, 2019, at 6:24 AM, Dragos Leahu wrote: > > root at omv:~# upscmd -l ups > Instant commands supported on UPS [ups]: > > beeper.toggle - Toggle the UPS beeper > load.off - Turn off the load immediately > load.on - Turn on the load immediately > shutdown.return - Turn off the load and return when power is back > shutdown.stayoff - Turn off the load and remain off