similar to: What's happening now here?

Hello list. I'm posting here although I'm actually running rsync from within rsnapshot, but the problem is really rsync-related. I've set up remote backups: remote client to backup from is Windows Server 2003 with sshd and rsyncd running, local server is Debian Linux (Lenny) with rsnapshot configured to use an ssh tunnel. My command line is this one: ssh -f

Vijesti iz svijeta piramida najaktivnije arheolo?ke lokacije na svijetu Mjese?ni izvje?taj za august 2014. donosi: - Legendarni Graham Hancock na bosanskim piramidama - Potvr?ena veza izme?u podzemnih tunela i piramida - Briljantni profesor Konstantin Mejl o Podzemnom labirintu Ravne - Energetska zraka na vrhu Bosanske piramide Sunca - Konferencija ?Skrivena

Hello, No ttyUSB* device under /dev however the new driver has detected the UPS, the nut services are able to start, just "upsc -l ups" sais unknown error and doesn't return any information. Could be due to the driver unable to detect number of battery packs as reported by the nut-driver.service startup? How can I fix that? root at omv:~# systemctl status nut-driver.service●

Hello everybody. I got a strange problem, which I hope to solve with your help. I'm doing "remote backups" using rsync in an ssh tunnel. In the last setup I realized, something is driving me crazy and I can't find *what* the problem is. I managed to successfully login via ssh in a "passwordless" way (by means of RSA-keys). After this step is done and I'm logged

Hello, Replaced UPS Kstar Micropower Micro 1200 (managed via blazer_usb) with https://www.njoy.ro/UPS/horus-plus-2000. The latter doesn't seem to be supported. 1. I tried blazer_usb and usbhid-ups. Any other suggestions? 2. What would be needed to get it supported by NUT? ======== HW ======== HP Microserver Gen 8 ======== UPS ======== Working:Kstar Micropower Micro

Hi Virtualizers, I just setup a CentOS 6 box (at home) to run as a KVM host. It's replacing an absolutely ancient CentOS 5 server that's running Xen. I have one OS drive, and two drives in RAID 1 with LVM on top which is being used as the KVM storage pool. I created a KVM that will run OpenMediaVault (OMV). OMV requires an OS drive (which is really a LVM), and a separate drive(s) to

By side effect, lack of "killpower" touch file works to not-tell the OS shutdown integration on OMV to turn off the UPS. A more proper way about this is generally to change MONITOR back-ups 1 monmaster 4L[p9<0Vi|Z>xKgK master (see my earlier message or docs about primary/master vs. secondary/slave clients), to MONITOR back-ups 1 monmaster 4L[p9<0Vi|Z>xKgK slave and it

Hello list. I've got following: rsync: opendir "client05" (in Profili) failed: Permission denied (13) rsync: delete_file: rmdir(client02/SendTo) failed: Permission denied (13) Am I correct if I say that the "opendir" is related to the source I'm trying to rsync, but the "delete_file" is related to the destination? Flavio Boniforti PIRAMIDE INFORMATICA

Hy people, where could this be coming from? rsync: send_files failed to open "Alfredo Polti SA/wz_ALFREDO_POLTI_SA.ac0" (in Winway_z-32): Device or resource busy (16) rsync: send_files failed to open "Alfredo Polti SA/wz_ALFREDO_POLTI_SA.ac3" (in Winway_z-32): Device or resource busy (16) rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code 23) at

Hello there, is it a known issue/problem with rsync transferring big files (let's say over 0,5 GB)? I'm using "rsync -rtz" to transfer over an SSH tunnel and I always get 12 Error in rsync protocol data stream Any suggestions on how to solve this? Maybe removing "z" compression could be helping? At this regard: how does compression work? When is it done? I mean, are

Hi, I'm working hard to setup winbind and openLDAP work together with TLS My networks contains: - a windows server 2008 R2 domain controller - a debian 6 based file server (openmediavault v0.4) running OpenLDAP 2.4.23 and Samba v3.5.6 - a debian 7 computer running winbind 3.6.6 I want to let OpenLDAP store SID <=> uig/gid mapping to ensure constant uid and gid for users on all linux

On 20/05/2019 19:47, Hendrik Friedel wrote: > Hello, > >>>> You posted this: >>>> I am using Openmediavault (debian based NAS distribution), which is >>>> not actively supporting btrfs >>>> It is this that I was referring to. >>> Ah, yes. >>> OMV intended to move to btrfs as the only choice with the next >>>

put map untrusted to domain = yes in smb.conf and strarted winbind. Now work !!!  nice -n '-20'  yes 'thanks a lot' Buda Il 11/01/19 10:56, Christian Naumer via samba ha scritto: > How about setting: > > map untrusted to domain = yes > > The default changed here. But it would still help if we could see the > smb.conf as the big difference with 4.8 is that

Hello, >> In my impression: Yes. Also, this problem seems to affect also zfs and > > I'm mostly interested in the claim that ZFS is affected. > I haven't followed this thread carefully, but what exactly is the problem we're > talking about, and how do we know it impacts ZFS? > [Something more than a single one-liner in that bug report?] Indeed, I only find

On 20/05/2019 18:54, Hendrik Friedel wrote: > Hello, > >> Is btrfs becoming more common ? > In my impression: Yes. Also, this problem seems to affect also zfs and > thus all (?) file systems that support checksums and scrubbing in > linux; consequently all filesystems that are the choice of users who > need this for ensuring data consistency. Not from my experience, but,

> > => many protocols from different clients (Windows 7 and 10 and Debian 9, > 10 and 12) : SMB2_02, SMB2_10, SMB3_11, NT1 A long time ago, we had a problem with oplocks causing system hangs. It COULD be related, and I think we ended up downgrading the kernel to 4.9. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198349#c42 But I've since upgraded to OMV 6+ without any problems.

I gave you the most simple option. And the difference is. myserverdomain\username works only on that server. (myserverdomain) .\username works on any server where the loginname and password are the same. There is NO other option for you that i know off. (sorry) Yes.. the other option is, setup an AD domain. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba

Hello, >>>You posted this: >>>I am using Openmediavault (debian based NAS distribution), which is not actively supporting btrfs >>>It is this that I was referring to. >>Ah, yes. >>OMV intended to move to btrfs as the only choice with the next version. In order to pave the way, I intended to be an early adopter. The problem I report here, that there is good

On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 15:46:23 +0200 "lnj.sam--- via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > We have a NAS server with OpenMediaVault on a Debian system. > > Mainly we work directly with documents from the LibreOffice and > Office tools. > > Sometimes we note at the opening of a LO document that the file is > corrupted and not repairable.

Hello, I am try to get my "new" UPS running with NUT on my OpenMediaVault device but only receive error meassages on several configurations I try. Your support is really appreciated for getting it solved. Best Regards, Olaf *lsusb* Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID