similar to: Bad File Descriptor | Permission Denied

I'm getting this incompatible type assertion when I run tblgen on my .td files: llvm/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:237: typename llvm::cast_retty<X, Y*>::ret_type llvm::cast(Y*) [with X = llvm::DefInit; Y = llvm::Init; typename llvm::cast_retty<X, Y*>::ret_type = llvm::DefInit*]: Assertion `isa<X>(Val) && "cast<Ty>() argument of incompatible

In our generated asm code we've got a constraint such that two registers in a ternary op have to be in different "banks", best illustrated with an example: add r1,r2,r1 # r1 <- r2 + r1 The problem here is that the first operand (the receiver of the value) is in the same "bank" as the 3rd operand (r1 again). This will cause an extra cycle to be burned. As it turns

Hello list, I am not sure if the terminology that I am using here is widely used, however, I provide an example in the hopes that my problem will become clear. My basic problem is that I am unsure of how to 'constrain' my model estimates to reproduce the aggregate (by factor levels) observed dependent variable for a negative.binomial model. I realize this sounds rather vague, so I provide

Hi, I'd like my samba server to control 2 domains. I've read there was 2 possibilities : - using netbios name/alias & include files - running 2 smbd the 1st way : my smb.conf goes like netbios name = istpc91 netbios aliases = winserv include = /etc/smb.conf.%L and my smb.conf.istpc91 workgroup = IST smb.conf.winserv workgroup =TESTIST with this solution i 2

Hi Ernest, I''m cc''ing the win32utils-devel mailing list in case anyone has any ideas. --- Ernest Ellingson <erne at powernav.com> wrote: > Daniel Berger wrote: > > >Hi Ernest, > > > >Me again. I just realized that it''s just a bug in > my > >documentation (duh). You can pass arguments to the > >Service.start method.

So I just imported an old zpool onto this new system. The problem would be one drive (c4d0) is showing up twice. First it''s displayed as ONLINE, then it''s displayed as "UNAVAIL". This is obviously causing a problem as the zpool now thinks it''s in a degraded state, even though all drives are there, and all are online. This pool should have 7 drives total,

I finally got around to adding these. The patch is posted in a pull request on my copy of llvm.git: https://github.com/jrk/llvm/pull/3 and a simple test with OCaml is here: https://gist.github.com/3948460 Feedback welcome. On Sep 14, 2012, at 7:53 PM, Jonathan Ragan-Kelley <jrk at csail.mit.edu> wrote: > Forgive me if I'm missing something obvious, but it seems that a >

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Jonathan Ragan-Kelley<jrk at csail.mit.edu> wrote: > What is the current state of the JIT on Windows x64? Broken; at the very least, there's http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3739 . -Eli

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Jonathan Ragan-Kelley <jrk at csail.mit.edu>wrote: > I can't seem to find reference to intrinsics, beyond the is_intrinsic > function. > > I am building a backend which needs to perform some target-specific > code-generation (for SSE, AVX, and NEON), and intrinsics are the > standard path in the C++ API. > What happens if you just

The OCaml bindings have been broken in trunk for a while. I chased it down to the addition of the Half type (rev 146786) not being reflected in the OCaml enums, causing mysterious type checking to break in the middle of the LLVM stack when using code generated from OCaml. The fix was trivial: https://github.com/jrk/llvm/pull/1/files -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment

On Sep 14, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Jonathan Ragan-Kelley <jrk at csail.mit.edu> wrote: > Is there a reason these should be omitted? Not in particular. Things are added to the C API as needed and usually on demand. -eric

How soon would I need to submit a patch for this for it to have a comfortable shot at making it into the 3.2 release? On Sep 14, 2012, at 8:05 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: > > On Sep 14, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Jonathan Ragan-Kelley <jrk at csail.mit.edu> wrote: > >> Is there a reason these should be omitted? > > Not in particular. Things are

Hi, On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander at nomadiclab.com> wrote: >  Would the best way be to add an option to -loop-unroll, and hack away at lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnroll.cpp? Instead, the better alternative is to write another pass similar to LoopUnrollPass.cpp (say LoopPeelPass.cpp) and add new option -loop-peel. The new pass could use llvm::UnrollLoop()

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Jonathan Ragan-Kelley <jrk at csail.mit.edu>wrote: > I notice that there is not currently any intrinsic support for atomics in > the PTX backend. Is this on the roadmap? Should it be as easy to add as it > seems (plumbing through just like the thread ID instructions, &c.)? The > obvious difference is that these ops have side effects. > It

Being resilvered 444.00 GB 168.21 GB 158.73 GB Just wondering if anyone has any rough guesstimate of how long this will take? It''s 3x1200JB ata drives and one Seagate SATA drive. The SATA drive is the one that was replaced. Any idea how long this will take? As in 5 hours? 2 days? I don''t see any way to get a status update on where it''s at in the reslivering

I am working on heavily optimising unusually static C++ code, and have encountered a situation where I basically want an optimiser that would speculatively unroll a loop to see if the first round of the loop could be optimised further. (I happen to know that it is possible.) The previous optimisations that produce the loop in the first place already do a magical job (relying heavily on constant

This question is specifically motivated by the practical constraints of NVVM, but I don't know anywhere better to ask (hopefully, e.g., @jholewinski is still following), and I believe it concerns general LLVM issues: NVIDIA's libNVVM is built on LLVM 3.2. This means its bitcode and LL text parsers are from that generation. It's interface calls for adding modules as either bitcode

Hello I wonder if anyone here could possibly help me? I am using Samba version 4.5.16-Debian (version information taken from sudo smbstatus) on Raspbian and attempting to prototype some future network infrastructure with a couple of Raspberry Pis. So far I have sucessfully created a Samba 4 AD DC ad1.samdom.example.com. I have successfully joined my Windows 10 dekstop client to the SAMDOM

Hi, I'm running rsync 2.5.6. I use it to backup a RH 7.3 file server (samba+appletalk) to a FAT32 external HD. I get the following output: .1e6prS failed: Invalid argumentsp_ind/Emails ind/.Icon .fJ98aa failed: Invalid argumentsp_ud/Emails ud/.Icon .qLRVCT failed: Invalid argumentkt/02_Tegninger/planer/ai/.Icon .zM65uw failed: Invalid argumentkt/02_Tegninger/planer/fmz/.Icon mkstemp

On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 11:54:16AM +0000, Thomas B. Rücker wrote: > That's not a version. > That's completely different software at this point. > It's also not Xiph.org, but published by Karl. It is a desirable feature, though. The use case is a server with one or more external feeds, where those feeds can be intermittent. You want a fallback-mount to a static file for