similar to: blocking file locks

Hi there, We are thinking about sharing same files: - OS2/Win clients with Samba - Linux clients with NFS. So, the same files would be shared by 2 different protocols. Looking at the open.c samba code, there seems to be no check / no error (sharing violation) returned to the smb client when the file is already locked by an NFS client. - So, even if a file is opened and locked by an NFS client,

Hi We've here some problems with Samba on a freeBSD-Server. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE Samba Version 3.0.25a The problem is about locking of open files. For example when a user A opens a excel-sheet and a user B also opens the same file, user B won't only open this file as read-only. We moved from a Windows Server to a freebsd based one about 2 weeks ago and we also had some problems with dbs

On 30/06/2020 14:55, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > Howdy! > > Am 6/30/20 um 2:37 PM schrieb Georg.Biberger--- via samba: >> We are using Samba 4.10.16 as a readonly file server on a linux box with SLES 12. All is working fine with our NAS NFS Shares. We are now trying to integrate new NFS Shares from an archive provider. We have some problems with samba not responding, when

Dear All, I try to use our cluster though samba share. Everything work fine, but I think, we should have -o flock at lustre mount time. Great, it''s work. But when I want to save a file on the share, I get this on the logs: Jan 31 10:45:24 opteron-ren-11 kernel: LustreError: 24836:0:(file.c:2309:ll_file_flock()) unknown fcntl lock type: 32 Jan 31 10:45:24 opteron-ren-11 kernel:

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 11:17:27 -0700, Computerisms Corporation via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > This occurred again this morning, when the user reported the problem, I > found in the ctdb logs that vacuuming has been going on since last > night. The need to fix it was urgent (when isn't it?) so I didn't have > time to poke around for clues, but immediately

Hi List, I set up a ctdb cluster a couple months back. Things seemed pretty solid for the first 2-3 weeks, but then I started getting reports of people not being able to access files, or some times directories. It has taken me a while to figure some stuff out, but it seems the common denominator to this happening is vacuuming timeouts for locking.tdb in the ctdb log, which might go on

> Howdy! > > Am 6/30/20 um 2:37 PM schrieb Georg.Biberger--- via samba: >> We are using Samba 4.10.16 as a readonly file server on a linux box with SLES 12. All is working fine with our NAS NFS Shares. We are now trying to integrate new NFS Shares from an archive provider. We have some problems with samba not responding, when accessing files on these archive NFS shares. >> We

Hi, I am trying to understand file locking and share modes. I am using RedHat Enterprise Linux 4, with kernel 2.6.9-55.ELsmp, samba-3.0.10-1.4E.11 and Windows XP. In particular I am looking at a machine running Linux exporting its local filesystem using Samba, with a Windows client accessing the file share. If I use byte range locking (fcntl() on Linux, LockFile() on Windows) things work as

Smb.conf: [global] security = ADS workgroup = MUC realm = europe.bmw.corp netbios name = EDAINT netbios aliases = edaint.muc log file = /lfs/EDA/DATA/SOFTWARE/samba/var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 10 # Default ID mapping configuration for local BUILTIN accounts # and groups on a domain member. The default (*) domain: # - must

Hi Martin, well, it has been over a week since my last hung process, but got another one today... >> So, not sure how to determine if this is a gluster problem, an lxc >> problem, or a ctdb/smbd problem. Thoughts/suggestions are welcome... > > You need a stack trace of the stuck smbd process. If it is wedged in a > system call on the cluster filesystem then you can blame

On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 22:48:57 -0800, Computerisms Corporation via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > well, it has been over a week since my last hung process, but got > another one today... > >> So, not sure how to determine if this is a gluster problem, an lxc > >> problem, or a ctdb/smbd problem. Thoughts/suggestions are welcome... > > > >

Hello, I've got an EPIA-M series motherboard in a system that has locked up twice under random conditions. Nothing is logged to the console or logs, the system just hangs. The system is installed with CentOS 4.4 and running the 2.6.9-42.0.8.EL i686 kernel. I am aware that older C3 processors had the CMOV problem, but that is resolved in the later boards (procinfo below). I've seen a

Hi Bob, On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 22:44:30 -0700, Computerisms Corporation via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I set up a ctdb cluster a couple months back. Things seemed pretty > solid for the first 2-3 weeks, but then I started getting reports of > people not being able to access files, or some times directories. It > has taken me a while to figure some stuff out,

It was rumored that Nevada build 105 would have ZFS encrypted file systems integrated into the main source. In reviewing the Change logs (URL''s below) I did not see anything mentioned that this had come to pass. Its going to be another week before I have a chance to play with b105. Does anyone know specifically if b105 has ZFS encryption? Thanks, Jerry -------- Original Message

Hi, I am new to this list, so please excuse any redundancy in my question. I have 60 Windows XP users who are tied into three Mac OSX File - Xserve file servers. There is one big problem - ... we are having issues with Excel files, that on occasion, are not being recognized, taking literally minutes to load and other quirky abnormalities. Excel on the XP desktop machines will refuse to save

I need the community''s opinion on the best way to use my storage SAN to host xen images. The SAN itself is running iSCSI and NFS. My goal is to keep all my xen images on the SAN device, and to be able to easily move images from one host to another as needed while minimizing storage requirements and maximizing performance. What I see are my options: 1) Export a directory through NFS.

Hi Volker Thanks for your quick answer. Now I upgraded samba to 3.0.32 but this didn't fix the problem. We have three other servers with freebsd and samba in our environment. I also compared the settings and the only difference I can find is that on this server with these problems is the acl support disabled because we had some problems with it. May this acl support have something to do

Just upgraded Saturday from Ubuntu 7.10 to 8.04.01. File locking in Samba is now broken, meaning two different users can have the same file open at the same time and edit it. Server is RedHat 9.0 running Samba 2.2.7a-security-rollup-fix. This has been working well for us for several years. Have one WinXP box accessing the server using OOo 2.0. Have another couple of Win95 boxes. In addition,

Greetings to all, It's been rumored that subj is possible, even with no decoding/encoding the .ogg file, but simply throwing out some information from it. I just wonder: is it really possible, and if yes, if there some software capable of doing this? -- [dan@shinestar ~]$ ls -l /dev/brains ls: /dev/brains: No such file or directory --- >8 ---- List archives:

Greetings, I have a few questions pertaining to BTRFS RAID. I know it''s been rumored a lot recently that kernel 3.4 will have RAID5/6 support, is this still the case. Also, is it possible to change from a single drive system to a raid system or even a multi drive system without raid to a raid system while there is data on the drives an successfully convert them without loosing data?