similar to: Clarification of 'administrator' config w/ldap

When I try to virt-install a PV instance of F11, I''m getting an ''invalid kernel'' message, as if it''s not a Xen kernel. I have tried both the i386 and x86_64 versions. Is there any weirdness with this distro that I''m not aware of?

I'm not able to add machine account(specifically Samba member servers) to my Samba 3.0 Domain. When I try to run 'net rpc join' and provide the root credentials, I get 'NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER' in the output. My domain database is in LDAP and root is a local unix user. I know auth works, because 'net rpc info' works. It seems there's a problem mapping between the

I'm try to create a single sign on configuration for a home fileserver, storing user accounts in the directory and using those credentials to authenticate Linux shell logins, server applications and PDC logins. I have NSS working correctly and am trying to extend my LDAP schema to accommodate Samba. For the benefit of my own understanding, I'm trying to make the necessary changes to my

The version of Dovecot I am currently using keeps different read pointers depending on if it's being accessed by POP or IMAP. I understand that in 1.0this is unified. If I upgrade the server in place, what will the status of my messages be? Will everything be marked unread? IMAP pointers become official? POP pointers become official? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

I'm having trouble wading through the various documents that only partially apply to my situation. I have an exsting LDAP instance providing NSS login data to my small group of linux machines. I want to also now provide domain logins against those user accounts. So far I have determined that I need to 1. add the samba schema to the directory 2. set the attribute access appropriately 3. add

We could add the MSVS project files to the repository but I too would like to see a single mechanism for building on all platforms. Someone mentioned using the Boost build system a few weeks ago but I haven't heard anything more on how that effort is going. I also think we can customize our existing makefiles to use the underlying (command oriented) tools under MSVS. We'd still need

On 9.5.2019 9.01, Christian Balzer via dovecot wrote: > Hello, > > Both the examples on the Push Notification wiki page and the XAPS plugin > docs seem to suggest or state that LMTP/LDA is required. It is required. > However IMAP IDLE notifications work without either of these (please no > religious discussion of why Dovecot LMTP is the best thing since sliced > bread and

> There's no free implementation that I'm aware of. Thompson may be > able to sell you something, but I've no idea how much it will cost. > Frankly, I'd move to Ogg Vorbis, it's supported by more players > anyway. From a quality standpoint, I'd love to, but from a 'supporting paid users of a stream with minimal effort' standpoint, the amount of

Hello, On Thu, 9 May 2019 09:14:13 +0300 Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > On 9.5.2019 9.01, Christian Balzer via dovecot wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Both the examples on the Push Notification wiki page and the XAPS plugin > > docs seem to suggest or state that LMTP/LDA is required. > > It is required. > Thanks for the quick, but unwelcome reply. There's a

Hello, Both the examples on the Push Notification wiki page and the XAPS plugin docs seem to suggest or state that LMTP/LDA is required. However IMAP IDLE notifications work without either of these (please no religious discussion of why Dovecot LMTP is the best thing since sliced bread and that everybody should use it). The LUA part of the push notification docs however states that events other

Hi All, A twitter user, Mike fc (@coolbutuseless) mentioned today that he was surprised that repeated NAs weren't treated as a run by the rle function. Now I know why they are not. NAs represent values which could be the same or different from eachother if they were known, so from a purely conceptual standpoint there is no way to tell whether they are the same and thus constitute a run or

I'm testing Samba/ldap for the first time, and I seem to be getting the expected results. I've configured a pdc and a member server (security = domain). Using net rpc, the member server successfully joined the domain. The member server is using the pdc's ldap server for authentication - no winbind used. All packages are Debian Lenny. I still have to perform a test of joining

Dear list, I would like to know if the following statements are true, just to make sure that my understanding of passwords/ldap stuff is correct... Vampireing passwords from an nt4 pdc only populates the ldap server with windows passwords, and not the (linux) userPassword. Authenticating linux logons against this ldap server is therefore only possible using winbind. 'Normal' ldap

This post addresses URLs generated by Ruby on Rails from a human factors point of view. Allow me to use Hieraki as an example. Hieraki is a great application. It was one of my first introductions to the power of Ruby on Rails. Scenario: When I navigated to Chapter 1 of a book the URL in my address bar was http://www.library.com/read/chapter/6. This inconsistancy ("Am I on Chapter 1 or

I can authenticate at the smb level, but there's something wrong at the posix level when I try to edit or create files. I am always denied access regardless of how loose the file/directory permissions are. This is what I am seeing in the logs - [2009/12/20 00:57:35, 4] smbd/uid.c:change_to_user(183) change_to_user: Skipping user change - already user [2009/12/20 00:57:35, 5]

Hello, I'm using package RpgSQL. Is there a better way to create a multi-line query/character string? I'm looking for less to type and readability. This is not very readable for large queries: s <- 'create table r.BOD("id" int primary key,"name" varchar(12))' I write a lot of code, so I'm looking to type less than this, but it is more readable from

G'Day All, Can someone help me out please. My new CISCO 7960's manual says I have to setup a TFTP server. Googled it and got a little understanding, but from * standpoint, well I am still a lost. Can I set this tftp server on the same * box? Can in be on a WinXP box? Which tftp software would you recommend? Thanks much. BTY: Does anyone have a How-To on getting the 7960 fully configured

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Dan Albert <danalbert at google.com> wrote: > >> Shouldn't it just use the default unwinder for the given platform? >> > > Sure, but what is the default unwinder for a given platform? > > Lets go with Linux. I have two different

Hello zfs-discuss, What would you rather propose for ZFS+ORACLE - zvols or just files from the performance standpoint? -- Best regards, Robert mailto:rmilkowski at task.gda.pl http://milek.blogspot.com

Hi, I am planning to use LLVM in my compiler dev project. I would like to know what power LLVM code optimization phase provides to my code ? I had a look at http://llvm.org/docs/Passes.html which describes the optimization passes. >From a newbie standpoint can you please explain the power of LLVM optimization? Thank you, Prakash -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was