similar to: contrib repository not mentioned on AdditionalResources/Repositories

Could someone please replace the contents of http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories with the contents of http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? I believe I have removed as much of the link rot on that page as I am capable. If someone believes the links I have provided are not appropriate for the purposes of the article, please let me know.

I would like to be given sufficient access to http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories that I may copy the raw text to a SubPage of my HomePage. I propose to edit the links on that SubPage and submit it for review by anyone who may have sufficient knowledge to validate my changes. I have yet to work with the RPM Package Manager, so I will be making edits that need to be reviewed

KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in the main channel having issues with Atomic (there's a name that's going to end up causing problems...) and the continued use of RPMForge/RepoForge, with no indication that they're really really bad. As well as the recognition of the reality that there are a

SerNet has en pages on their site: http://www.SerNet.de/en/samba/ Since I am maintaining the base (en) page page of http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories shouldn't the en SerNet home page be the reference in the SerNet paragraph? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Good morning. Might I please have edit access to the AdditionalResources/Repositories page on the wiki? Account name is JohnDennison. Thanks! John -- Humans hate to admit error even as they stand there, black and smoldering, with the stub of a cigarette in one hand, in the middle of a wide crater containing them and the remains of a sign that once read "DANGER: VOLATILE

Excellent. Thank you; a most useful option of the MoinMoin wiki. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote: > On 9 December 2014 at 21:19, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> > wrote: > > I would like to be given sufficient access to > > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories that I may copy > the >

I see this commit: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:42:14 From: noreply at centos.org To: noreply at centos.org Subject: centos wiki] Update of AdditionalResources/Repositories by PhilSchaffner The following page has been changed by PhilSchaffner: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories?action=diff&rev2=96&rev1=95 The comment on

On 5 January 2015 at 16:34, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > Could someone please replace the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories > with the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? > > I believe I have removed as much of the link rot on that page as I am capable. > If

Patrick, looks fine to me. Thanks for the work -- when I did a major revision I tried to remove some of the rot and got tired of trying, along with refactoring the page in general. Your dedication is appreciated. On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:34 AM, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > Could someone please replace the contents of >

On 01/05/2015 04:34 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > Could someone please replace the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories > with the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? > I dont understand the concept of community approved. What does that mean ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 |

On 01/09/2015 11:49 PM, Tom Sorensen wrote: > KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with > discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in the main channel > having issues with Atomic (there's a name that's going to end up causing > problems...) and the continued use of RPMForge/RepoForge, with no > indication that they're really

I just setup a personal home page and the template had a section that I edited to look like this: [[MailTo(sean AT SPAMFREE msgilligan DOT com)]] I assumed it would use JavaScript to protect my e-mail address, but when I view source on the page it's right there: <p class="line862">Email: <a class="mailto" href="mailto:name at address.com">name at

On 9 December 2014 at 21:19, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to be given sufficient access to > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories that I may copy the > raw text to a SubPage of my HomePage. > > I propose to edit the links on that SubPage and submit it for review by > anyone who may have sufficient knowledge to

Oops, I copied the page with the acl of the original page, which, of course, means I can't edit it. Lesson learned, I hope. Could you please fix the acl so I may proceed with my edit? Sorry to be such a bother. I'm more used to working on Wikimedia wiki's. My MoinMoin skills are rusty. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:28 PM, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: >

GhettoForge seems to be using new software for their wiki. http://GhettoForge.org/ redirects to http://GhettoForge.org/index.php/Main_Page which is probably adequate. http://GhettoForge.org/wiki/Usage returns a 404. It appears http://GhettoForge.org/index.php/Usage is the replacement. I will make the appropriate change in my copy of http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories. Also

Trinity Desktop Environment seems to have started using a wiki. The information that may have been at http://www.TrinityDesktop.org/installation.php#redhat now seems to be at https://wiki.trinitydesktop.org/RedHat_Trinity_Repository_Installation_Instructions The other links seem to work as is. I will make the appropriate change in my copy of

On 1 April 2017 at 07:53, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > Good morning. > > Might I please have edit access to the AdditionalResources/Repositories > page on the wiki? Account name is JohnDennison. > > Thanks! > > John Access arranged, as requested. Please check and let me know if there is any problem. Alan.

I did the last major rewrite of the AdditionalRepos page, in large part because of issues we see repeatedly on the IRC channels. The repos placed in the "known problem" section are there for a good reason -- they replace base packages by default, or they're poorly maintained, leading to security issues. Or both. Atomic falls squarely into the former category -- it replaces key parts

Hello. With the help of the community I finished polishing the translation of my PHP script to Bash version http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=20222&forum=38 It has now autodetection of architecture and CentOS version and handles errors. I have published an article under my homepage here: http://wiki.centos.org/VladislavRastrusny/AutoRPMForgeRepo

On 14/01/15 23:38, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:26 PM, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:09:01PM -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote: >>> Proposal: >>> The Third Party Repositories section should not list any other repositories, >>> but should only note there are difficulties in making several