PatrickD Garvey
2015-Jan-05 16:34 UTC
[CentOS-docs] Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
Could someone please replace the contents of http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories with the contents of http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? I believe I have removed as much of the link rot on that page as I am capable. If someone believes the links I have provided are not appropriate for the purposes of the article, please let me know. I'm still in the process of learning and will be glad to share the improved knowledge of any others. -- PatrickD Garvey Striving to be PDG.
Alan Bartlett
2015-Jan-05 17:09 UTC
[CentOS-docs] Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
On 5 January 2015 at 16:34, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote:> Could someone please replace the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories > with the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? > > I believe I have removed as much of the link rot on that page as I am capable. > If someone believes the links I have provided are not appropriate for > the purposes of the article, please let me know. I'm still in the > process of learning and will be glad to share the improved knowledge > of any others.Done. And assuming I have not made any mistake with the acl, you should now be capable of editing that page directly. Alan.
PatrickD Garvey
2015-Jan-05 17:35 UTC
[CentOS-docs] Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote:> On 5 January 2015 at 16:34, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: >> Could someone please replace the contents of >> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories >> with the contents of >> http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? >> >> I believe I have removed as much of the link rot on that page as I am capable. >> If someone believes the links I have provided are not appropriate for >> the purposes of the article, please let me know. I'm still in the >> process of learning and will be glad to share the improved knowledge >> of any others. > > Done. And assuming I have not made any mistake with the acl, you > should now be capable of editing that page directly. > > Alan.After I logged on, the page displayed the Edit options. I was able to make a bad edit, display a Preview, and Cancel that edit. I think that indicates we have what we intended. Thank you, PatrickD
Tom Sorensen
2015-Jan-07 22:38 UTC
[CentOS-docs] Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
Patrick, looks fine to me. Thanks for the work -- when I did a major revision I tried to remove some of the rot and got tired of trying, along with refactoring the page in general. Your dedication is appreciated. On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:34 AM, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote:> Could someone please replace the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories > with the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? > > I believe I have removed as much of the link rot on that page as I am > capable. > If someone believes the links I have provided are not appropriate for > the purposes of the article, please let me know. I'm still in the > process of learning and will be glad to share the improved knowledge > of any others. > > -- > PatrickD Garvey > Striving to be PDG. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20150107/970766e3/attachment-0002.html>
PatrickD Garvey
2015-Jan-08 02:43 UTC
[CentOS-docs] Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Tom Sorensen <tsorensen at gmail.com> wrote:> Patrick, looks fine to me. Thanks for the work -- when I did a major > revision I tried to remove some of the rot and got tired of trying, along > with refactoring the page in general. Your dedication is appreciated.You're welcome. Thanks for noticing.
Karanbir Singh
2015-Jan-09 13:47 UTC
[CentOS-docs] Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
On 01/05/2015 04:34 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote:> Could someone please replace the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories > with the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? >I dont understand the concept of community approved. What does that mean ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
PatrickD Garvey
2015-Jan-09 22:14 UTC
[CentOS-docs] Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:> On 01/05/2015 04:34 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote: >> Could someone please replace the contents of >> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories >> with the contents of >> http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? >> > > > I dont understand the concept of community approved. What does that mean ? > > > -- > Karanbir SinghThat came in with TomSorensen 's "Large revamp" in revision 187. The paragraph in that section isn't a sufficient explanation?
Tom Sorensen
2015-Jan-09 23:49 UTC
[CentOS-docs] Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in the main channel having issues with Atomic (there's a name that's going to end up causing problems...) and the continued use of RPMForge/RepoForge, with no indication that they're really really bad. As well as the recognition of the reality that there are a very few repos that are frequently recommended (and, in the case of EPEL, now easily enabled in CentOS). I don't believe I discussed it on this list, which is entirely my fault, but there were some revisions afterwards by others in the community to help do cleanup as well. On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:> On 01/05/2015 04:34 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > > Could someone please replace the contents of > > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories > > with the contents of > > http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? > > > > > I dont understand the concept of community approved. What does that mean ? > > > -- > Karanbir Singh > +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh > GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20150109/c4006579/attachment-0002.html>
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
- Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
- Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
- Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
- Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories