similar to: CentOS 4.7 glibc update: not announced?

Well, there's so few going right now that I'm showing 38 days to get the DVD. My normal dnld from a mirror travels appx. 600Mb/sec. I'll wait until most of the U.S. goes home before I give up and use the normal download though. Here's hoping... -- Bill

I have been looking at the security advisories provided here: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/ It appears that there is not a 1:1 correlation between advisories listed here and advisories listed by Red Hat: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata Is there a specific reason for this? Also, is there an alternate location to find all Errata information for CentOS? Joshua Bahnsen

On 12 March 2008, "William L. Maltby" <CentOS4Bill at triad.rr.com> wrote: > Message: 95 > Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:56:42 -0400 > From: "William L. Maltby" <CentOS4Bill at triad.rr.com> > Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 5 Evolution Update errors. > To: CentOS General List <centos at centos.org> > Message-ID: <1205323003.5338.6.camel at

Ran yum update this A.M. Got this. Is it a problem for rpmforge, CentOS or just me? Maybe not a problem at all? /etc/ld.so.conf.d files are "box stock", so there were no clues there. TIA for any insight. =================================================== Running Transaction Updating : cups-libs [ 1/10] /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is

I sometimes receive e-mails I post to this list, like I did the bug I reported about X problems, but other times not, like my first post about that before I reported the bug. That one appeared in gmane, but Evolution never picked it up. And today I've not seen either of my posts but I know it got there because I did see a reply to my post about the flash plugin and it had a snippet of my post

I don't know if I'm brain damaged this A.M. or what, but I can't figure (recall?) why this summary says CentOS 5 in the "Today's Topics", has "el5" and "centos.3" as well in the md5sum. Gentle chides for being dense this morning are accepted. TIA -- Bill

On 2015-04-04, Bill Maltby (C4B) <centos4bill at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 11:12 +0100, Nux! wrote: >> 100% with Digimer here. <snip> > >> All this energy should be put into contributing towards to the >> project, testing, helping out community. > > Well, I used to agree. But when a bug report filed in December goes > untouched entering

Trying yum update for the latest announcements. Part of the problem I experienced last week appears again: lame library DSA key is unavailable. I had tried to resolve this last week, to no avail. Tried again this week and found a French site with the key ID, but for libmad. Anyone can give me the proper instructions so this works? TIA Bill Here is a snipped part of the yum log.

Two things have been weighing on my mind regarding security issues. The first is that when I downloaded the CentOS 4.1 ISO images, I could not get the sums to match even using different downloads from different mirrors. I decided that that I was doing something wrong and decided to trust the images. So far no regrets. But I am concerned that I get it right the next time. I thought I had read

I need to start running a dual head on one of my machines. Eventual target is CentOS 5.x. Decided to test first on my 4.6 setup (eventually it will achieve 5.x). Both machines are fully up to date. The test machine is 4.6, 2 radeon video cards. Searched the web, CentOS site, even bugzilla. This bugzilla entry from a 4.2 system), http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1875 had only a WFM response.

As the subject says. Just an FYI. -- Bill

Anybody have tricks to write the i386 ISO image to DVD? I've tried DVD+-RW, DVD+R, DVD-RW, DVD-R in both Windows 7 (two different writers) and rebooted into CentOS 6 (x86_64) and tried cdrecord (now called wodim). On wodim I've tried overburn, reducing speeds, etc. All give the same results: the same number of bytes are written - indicating the disc is full (according to my calculations)

Alle, Has anyone gotten Zimbra to work on an installation of CentOS4.3, x86_64 architecture? I have tried to install the RHEL4 3.1.4 32-bit version with the following error: Found zimbra-core Error: attempting to install i386 packages on a x86_64 OS. Exiting... Shouldn't this work with 32-bit compat? I've also tried to install RHEL4_64 4.0.0.RC1 but post installation fails when

Looks like Firefox may be getting another update soon, if my problem is not atypical. Prior to the latest, had NP for *months*. Anyone else seeing any problems? BTW, running the recent Java console from sun that was detailed in another thread a week or two back with Firefox. Had NP prior to the latest update, if that offers any useful info. Would like to test the openjdk for us if it's

Folks, Evo update on my 4.x worked just fine. 5.0 generated a bunch of parsing errors preceded and followed by a couple of I/O errors that appear related to an unavailable URL. I first figured corruption on my node, so I yum erased evo, its - connector and -webcal units. The data-server removal looked as if it might remove half my Gnome desktop, so I left it in place. Then I did a selective

Johnny, Thought I'd try these out for you. Looks like a prerequisite is missing? yum --enablerepo=c5-testing install java-1.6.0-openjdk\* <snip the usual gobbledygook> 330 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package

I had the electricity go out the other day. When my Centos 4.3 workstation came up, I said yes when it got to the prompt "Unclean shutdown, force filesystem check?" prompt. It ground away for awhile and then said something about a bad superblock. Yikes! I thought, that's a bad sign. After a reboot, I got nothing but a grub> prompt. I tried booting into rescue mode using the

On Aug 16, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) <centos4bill at gmail.com> wrote: > My preliminary conclusion is there's something in java and/or > libreoffice that begins causing load on the X server once activity > begins. The full effects of the java applet in FF could not be > determined during the attempt to duplicate due to the lack of a data > feed Saturday and

I need to setup HylaFax which leads to my first question, anyone got an opinion on whether or not to use HylaFax or HylaFax+? Also, I have to setup a Digi serial port server for an external fax modem. Any reco''s on a robust unit that won''t need to be reset often? Thanks! jlc

Hi New to CentOS 5.2 today. I cannot get MySQL 5.0.45 (default install) to start. X Fedora user. Mark