CentOS - Jan 2008 - Ques about 5 vs. 3 in CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 35, Issue 9

I don't know if I'm brain damaged this A.M. or what, but I can't
figure
(recall?) why this summary says CentOS 5 in the "Today's Topics",
has
"el5" and "centos.3" as well in the md5sum.

Gentle chides for being dense this morning are accepted.

TIA

-- 
Bill

William L. Maltby wrote:
> I don't know if I'm brain damaged this A.M. or what, but I
can't figure
> (recall?) why this summary says CentOS 5 in the "Today's
Topics", has
> "el5" and "centos.3" as well in the md5sum.
> 
> Gentle chides for being dense this morning are accepted.
Hmm? I don't really understand your question.

Old version was 2.2.3-6.el5.centos.1, new version is
2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3 - it's just naming.

Cheers,

Ralph
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080118/92ee77a7/attachment-0002.sig>

On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 13:14 +0100, Ralph Angenendt
wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > I don't know if I'm brain damaged this A.M. or what, but I
can't figure
> > (recall?) why this summary says CentOS 5 in the "Today's
Topics", has
> > "el5" and "centos.3" as well in the md5sum.
> > 
> > Gentle chides for being dense this morning are accepted.
> 
> Hmm? I don't really understand your question.
> 
> Old version was 2.2.3-6.el5.centos.1, new version is
> 2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3 - it's just naming.
AHA! In my early morning decaffeinated state, I kept thinking of
"CentOS-3" when I saw "centos.3". I looked and looked at it
and finally
decided I'd ask.

Thanks Ralph!
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Ralph
> <snip sig stuff>
-- 
Bill