similar to: actionmailer / @recipeints

Is there an expert validater that can point me in the right direction? I''ve looked for extended documentation on ''validates_presence_of'' but i can''t seem to find any. I''m trying to make sure that i don''t enter a nil object in my database, so i''ve added validate_presence_of to my Record Model. i.e. --> class Record <

Does any one know how to comment out code in a controller (.rb file) Thanks, Yng -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I''m trying to ''destroy'' a particular record of a table >From the controller side, i''ve found a list of possible records that i want deleted. ie. @chart = Chart.find(:all, :conditions => ["record_id = ?", param[''id''] ] ''id'' is passed into the controller and @chart is all the possible records that have

Hi, If I set the p.adjust="none", does it meant that the output p values from the pairwise.t.test will be the same as those from individual t.tests (set var.equal=T, alternative="t")? I actually got different p values from the two tests. See below. Is it supposed to be this way? Thanks Johnny > x [1] 61.6 52.7 61.3 65.2 62.8 63.7 64.8 58.7 44.9 57.0 64.3 55.1 50.0 41.0

Hi, I''m looking for a particular record from a view called ''charts''. The view ''charts'' joins data from a table ''record'' and a table ''owners''. I''m trying to pull up data from ''charts'' that lists certain data from ''record'' ie. I know i need record.id = 5. Is there a

Can some1 help me on syntax with the find() function. I''m trying to pull up a table record, called chart, that has a particular field specified. ie chart has a field called record_id, which i know. How can i find the record that contains chart.record_id. something like chart = Chart.find(:conditions => "record_id = :id") this gives me an error. I''m passing

I can''t seem to figure out how to validate a few fields some1 please help me out model--------- class Record < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :sw, :flex end controller------------ class RecordController < A;;icationController def new @record = Rrecord.new @product = Product.find(params[''product_id'']) end def create

Hi, I''m doing a find_by_sql and am getting an odd error when trying to render the result to xml. The find is: children_list = find_by_sql("SELECT components.componentid, components.logicalname, versions.level, versions.branch, versions.sequence FROM components, versions where components.componentid = ''" + component_id + "''" + " AND

Hi all, In my controller I am doing the following to populate a nested form for a has_many through association: def new @specification = Specification.new Component.find_each.each do |component| @specification.component_specifications.build(:component_id => component.id) end The idea being whenever someone creates or edits a form, it will be populated with all

I am struggling to find the best way to set up relationships to achieve this so that it fits the rails idioms. I have a table of products and I want to be able to create a bill of materials for a product.. So a product can either be a single item, or a package consisting of several other products. I have created a table: ---- class BomItem < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :product

I want to find out what are the associations with another active record class. So If my class is as below: Class Component < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :branches end class Branch < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :component end and then I do Component.reflections[:branches].active_record I would expect that to be Branch but it is in fact Component. The inspection of

Hello, I''m just starting out with some Rails development and have the following table structure. I understand how to do a two table has many join but I actually need to relate a third table. Here is my structure: components id name updated_at elements id name updated_at element_types id name updated_at components_elements component_id element_id

Since the image pointed to may (and generally will) live in boot services memory (which we add to the global memory pool long before ACPI tables get looked at), we should prevent Dom0 from trying to retrieve the image data. The alternatives would be to - not add boot services memory to the global pool at all, or - defer adding boot services memory until Dom0 indicates it is safe to do so, or -

Hello Elias, Monday, December 15, 2014, 4:13:20 PM, you wrote: EP> Sounds like it might be differences in precision of the timestamp. Could be, thoght the NAS box has the sending system as it's NTP server so their times should be in sync. EP> Check out the `--modify-window` option. Doesn't seem to stop all the folders being listed even though nothing is transferred.

Hello Les, Sunday, December 14, 2014, 7:18:09 PM, you wrote: LM> Folders should only be listed if timestamps or permissions are different. Further experimentation shows this to be the case IF the destination is another local drive. Unfortunately the required destination is a CIFS share, which might change things. -- Best regards, Niamh mailto:niamh at

I feel awful asking such a basic question, but here it goes.... I have a controller, "NewsController". The user enters and the "list" action is called and I populate an instance variable "@news" which contains all the elements I''d like to display using a form. The user then changes something and the "update" action is called. Is

# shorewall version 3.2.1 SNAT is enabled. Setting up DNAT to do port forwarding -- this example looked exactly like what I wanted: (FAQ 1c) From the internet, I want to connect to port 1022 on my firewall and have the firewall forward the connection to port 22 on local system 192.168.1.3. How do I do that? In /etc/shorewall/rules: #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST PORT

Hi, We're running dovecot 2.2.13, virtual users, with postfix. We have an olddomain and a new domainname. To 'translate' *@olddomain into *@newdomain, I have configured: > cat /etc/postfix/canonical > @olddomain.com @newdomain.com While this seems to work, lately we have noticed that dovecot occasionally creates mailboxes for non-existent users, like: >

Hello I have this scenario (hope it is understandable): I have a model to support fact messages of different types. This is sport related and I have currently the following model design. matchfacts (is the generic table connecting all matchfacts to for instance a match/game, match has_many matchfacts). Some matchfact-data is generic, like the time of fact and therefore the data should be stored

Hi! I think lines between 250-252 in file ssh-rsa.c in OpenSSH source code should be commented ! ! ! REASON: Using "SecureNetTerm Client" ( http://www.securenetterm.com/ ) with "SecureKeyAgent" ver. 5.4.2.4 ( Or same is with Putty + SecureKeyAgent ) to connect to OpenSSH server "OpenSSH ver. 3.6.1" using public key from Smart Card certificate causes the following