similar to: options netloop nloopbacks=<n> ignored

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "options netloop nloopbacks=<n> ignored"

2006 Sep 20
2
Bug#388486: xen-utils-common: upgrade new 2.6.17-2-xen breaks create domU until modprobe netloop nloopbacks=n
Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0+hg11292-2 Severity: normal After a recent etch upgrade (2.6.17, xen-3.0.2) I was unable to "xm create" until I "modprobe netloop nloopbacks=10" Error was network-bridge couln't create vif interface (backend not found). brctl addbr ... fails because of no free netloop device. passing more nloopbacks device to the module fixed the
2006 Mar 30
2
loopback.nloopbacks
The FAQ says to use loopback.nloopbacks to limit the number of vif''s and veth''s that show up in dom0. This no longer appears to work. Has this been remove with no replacement or has this just changed and the FAQ hasn''t kept up? -- Jason The place where you made your stand never mattered, only that you were there... and still on your feet
2010 Dec 09
0
[PATCH linux-2.6.18-xen] make netloop permanent
Hi, with reference to RH BZ#567540 [0], this patch makes the netloop module permanent (like netback is currently). It reverts parts of xen-unstable c/s 9019:271cb04a4f2b [1] [2] (though that has a typo: "__init clean_loopback", so it was probably changed later too). The patch fixes the problem of "rmmod netloop" hanging, resulting in blocked tasks and inability to shut down
2008 Jan 31
3
xen 3.2 network problems
Hi, I try to get networking running with xen 3.2, but it seems I fail miserably. I am on sles10sp1, with xen 3.2.0, and kernel rpm''s installed from SP2. I configured in /etc/sysconfig/network the NETWORK_LIST: NETWORK_LIST="bridge,0,default,00:DE:AD:BE:EF,192.168.8.13/24,dhcp-off" but an ifconfig xenbr0 still shows the mac address of peth0 fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff. Initially, I
2011 Jan 05
7
Xen Netloop module missing
Hi, I was hoping someone on this forums could help me out with a problem I was facing with Xen. When I compiled the kernel for Xen-3.1.3 using "make world"(I know this is an old version but I need to use it for some compatibility issues), the kernel was missing the Xen netloop module. There was no /kernel/drivers/xen/netback/netloop.ko in the newly compiled kernel. I think we would
2009 Jan 11
0
network-bridge status something strange
Hello, I have got something strange when I done a /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge status : 201: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,10000> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:15:17:8d:cb:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff And when I done a /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge I have got this : Link veth0 1 is missing. This may be because you have reached the limit of the number of
2006 Dec 03
0
netloop vs tap
Hi, I''m playing with xen from a couple of weeks, all standard configurations work fine within my suse box. But trying to become closer to the xen philosophy I can''t understand the issues which drown developers to use netloop module instead of the tap one. thank''s in advance _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list
2006 Sep 22
0
Bug#388352: netloop module not loaded
It appears that this bug is caused by the netloop kernel module not being automatically loaded. xn
2009 Mar 03
0
Xen networking and netloop
Hi all, I recently change my Xen 3.1 for a 3.2 and I discover I have to set IP address on bridge rather than on virtual interfaces. I used to use bridge set on dummy interface to create virtual networks (not vlan) inside my Xen system. Without IP on it bridges can be consider as a hub. dom0 can be outside of these virtual networks. With IP on bridge, dom0 will exists on these networks, and I
2006 Oct 27
0
Re: loop devices
> I have installed xen-unstable change set 1150. I have 3 nics in my system. > > My ifconfig shows eth1, eth4 and eth5. > > And a brctl show shows xenbr1 only. > > When I try to create bridge 4 > > /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge vifnum=4 start > > > > Link veth4 is missing. (...) > I tried increasing the loopback devices in the kernel boot
2006 Oct 10
1
Bug#392109: bug in xen-utils
Package: xen-utils-3.0.2-1 Version: 3.0.2-3+hg9762-1 Hi, while trying to get xen work, I encountered two problems: 1. I don't know if its really an error, but I think something is messed up with the subdir-name /usr/lib/xen-3.0.2-1 because the version-number of the package suggests that it is an other version, than the subdir says. Every time when I call xm for example I get: WARING!
2008 Feb 01
3
No peth interface for xenbr4 and xenbr5
Hello all, I have a Xen server with 6 network interfaces, I want a bridge on all of them. I use a personal network script like this : #!/bin/bash dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@"
2006 Sep 20
3
Bug#388352: xen-hypervisor-3.0-unstable-1-amd64: veth0 is missing
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0-unstable-1-amd64 Version: 3.0-unstable+hg11292-2 Severity: important My server is a dell 2950 server. Before the dom0 rebooting bug ocurred, xen was well even for hvm domU. By now i have tried xen-hypervisor-3.0-amd64 (3.0.2+hg9697-2) and xen-hypervisor-3.0-unstable-1-amd64 (3.0-unstable+hg11292-2), but both of them are unusable for me. for
2011 Feb 18
1
problem for add second bridge xenbr1
Dear I need create second bridge xenbr1 for separate traffic between my virtual machine , I following this step but show message that Link veth0 is missing, how I can create veth0 ? When I run script for create xenbr1 ./network-bridge netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 start Shwo this message Link veth0 is missing. This may be because you have reached the limit of the number of interfaces that the
2009 Jun 04
3
Dovecot under brute force attack - nice attacker
Hi List, optimizing the configuration on one of our servers (which was hit by a brute force attack on dovecot) showed an odd behavior. Dovecot Version 1.0.7 (CentOS 5.2) The short story: On one of our servers an attacker did a brute force attack on dovecot (pop3). Since the attacker closed and reopened the connection after every user/password combination the logs showed many lines like
2009 Jun 02
3
Dovecot under brute force attack - nice attacker
Hi List, optimizing the configuration on one of our servers (which was hit by a brute force attack on dovecot) showed an odd behavior. The short story: On one of our servers an attacker did a brute force attack on dovecot (pop3). Since the attacker closed and reopened the connection after every user/password combination the logs showed many lines like this: dovecot: pop3-login: Aborted
2009 Nov 10
1
Xen pci passthru problems with kernel -164.6.1
Hi there, After updating a server from CentOS 5.3 to 5.4 my Xen pci-passthru setup has some troubles. The server has two NICs, one used by dom0 and the other assigned to a domU and one SCSI controler assigned to another domU. It has been working fine since CentOS 5.1, when I did the initial setup. After upgrading to 5.4, I get this error when starting the domU with one of the NICs assigned:
2012 Feb 07
6
my notes on bond, bridge, network, kvm, host and virtual so far
I put this page together just so I won't spam the board anymore begging for help..lol http://bobhoffman.com/vmissue.html This shows a working effort of bonded eths, bridged into a vm, and a few other things. The only missing thing is something on the host that ends up putting the VM internet connection into some kind of limbo. Whether it is hardware related, bug related, libvirt nat
2008 Aug 27
2
Logwatch doesn´t report on dovecot
Hi List, Centos 5(.2) ships with dovecot-1.0.7-2.el5 and logwatch-7.3-6.el5 However the shipped logwatch is not aware of dovecot 1.x meaning none of the log entries (var/log/maillog) are processed at all. Should I file a bug report on this? Upstream? cheers Henry
2008 Sep 29
2
scp partition "not a regular file"
Hi list, should it be possible to scp a partition with this command: scp /dev/sda7 backupserver:/backup/sda7.img I always get "not a regular file" - which is a clear and understandable error, but my googling tells me that some people are doing this - and it seems to work - at least at their systems. I know that I can avoid this by simply doing dd if=/dev/sda7 | ssh backupserver dd