similar to: Cannot Mirror RPOOL, Can''t Label Disk to SMI

I am getting the following error, however as you can see below this is a SMI label... cannot set property for ''rpool'': property ''bootfs'' not supported on EFI labeled devices # zpool get bootfs rpool NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE rpool bootfs - default # zpool set bootfs=rpool/ROOT/s10s_u8wos_08a rpool cannot set property for ''rpool'': property

I''ve installed Open Solaris 2009.06 on a machine with 5 identical 1TB wd green drives to create a ZFS nas. The intended install is one drive dedicated to the OS and the remaining 4 drives in a raidz1 configuration. The install is working fine, but creating the raidz1 pool and rebooting is causing the machine report "Cannot find active partition" upon reboot. Below is command

Since this seems to be a ubiquitous problem for people running ZFS, even though it''s really a general Solaris admin issue, I''m guessing the expertise is actually here, so I''m asking here. I found lots of online pages telling how to do it. None of them were correct or complete. I think. I seem to have accomplished it in a somewhat hackish fashion, possibly not

On 5/5/10 1:44 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote: > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 16:19 -0600, Evan Layton wrote: >> Can you try the following and see if it really thinks it''s an EFI lable? >> # dd if=/dev/dsk/c12t0d0s2 of=x skip=512 bs=1 count=10 >> # cat x >> >> This may help us determine if this is another instance of bug 6860320 > > # dd

I''ve hsut bought second drive for my hope PC and decided to do mirror. I''ve made pfexec zpool attach rpool c9d0s0 c13d0s0 waited for scrub and tried to install grub on second disk: $ pfexec installgrub /boot/grub/stage1 /boot/grub/stage2 /dev/rdsk/c13d0s0 cannot open/stat device /dev/rdsk/c13d0s2 $ pfexec installgrub /boot/grub/stage1 /boot/grub/stage2 /dev/rdsk/c13d0 raw

Hello all, This is not so much a question but rather a "how-to" for posterity. Comments and possible fixes are welcome, though. I''m toying (for work) with a Solaris 10 VM, and it has a dedicated virtual HDD for data and zones. The template VM had a 20Gb disk, but a particular application needs more. I hoped ZFS autoexpand would do the trick transparently, but it turned out

Hello! I''am setup zfs / cifs home storage server, end now have low performance with play movie stored on this zfs from windows client. server hardware is not new , but n windows it perfomance was normal. CPU is AMD Athlon Burton Thunderbird 2500, runing on 1,7GHz, 1024 RAM and storage: usb c4t0d0 ST332062-0A-3.AA-298.09GB /pci at 0,0/pci1458,5004 at 2,2/cdrom at 1/disk at

Avoids trying to create and replace version.h more than once which led to file-locking errors with multicore builds. --- Makefile.am | 1 + win32/VS2015/celt.vcxproj | 48 +++++++++++++++++--------- win32/VS2015/generate_version.vcxproj | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ win32/VS2015/opus.sln | 32 ++++++++++++++++-

For Solaris 10 5/09... There are supposed to be performance improvements if you create a zpool on a full disk, such as one with an EFI label. Does the same apply if the full disk is used with an SMI label, which is required to boot? I am trying to determine the trade-off, if any, of having a single rpool on cXtYd0s2, if I can even do that, and improved performance compared to having two

In my new oracle server, sol11exp, it''s using multipath device names... Presently I have two disks attached: (I removed the other 10 disks for now, because these device names are so confusing. This way I can focus on *just* the OS disks.) 0. c0t5000C5003424396Bd0 <SEAGATE-ST32000SSSUN2.0-0514 cyl 3260 alt 2 hd 255 sec 252> /scsi_vhci/disk at g5000c5003424396b

So I just imported an old zpool onto this new system. The problem would be one drive (c4d0) is showing up twice. First it''s displayed as ONLINE, then it''s displayed as "UNAVAIL". This is obviously causing a problem as the zpool now thinks it''s in a degraded state, even though all drives are there, and all are online. This pool should have 7 drives total,

I accidentally created a zpool on a boot disk, it paniced the system and now I can jumpstart and install the OS on it. This is what it looks like. partition> p Current partition table (original): Total disk sectors available: 17786879 + 16384 (reserved sectors) Part Tag Flag First Sector Size Last Sector 0 usr wm 34 8.48GB

Is it possible to recover the rpool with only a tar/star archive of the root filesystem? I have used the zfs send/receive methods and that work without a problem. What I am trying to do is recreate the rpool and underlying zfs filesystems (rpool/ROOT, rpool/s10_uXXXXXX, rpool/dump, rpool/swap, rpool/export, and rpool/export/home). I then mount the pool at a alternate root and restore the tar

I am trying to give a general user permissions to create zfs filesystems in the rpool. zpool set=delegation=on rpool zfs allow <user> create rpool both run without any issues. zfs allow rpool reports the user does have create permissions. zfs create rpool/test cannot create rpool/test : permission denied. Can you not allow to the rpool? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

I have a fresh install of Solaris 11 Express on a new SSD. I have inserted the old hard disk, and tried to import it, with: # zpool import -f <long id number> Old_rpool but the computer reboots. Why is that? On my old hard disk, I have 10-20 BE, starting with OpenSolaris 2009.06 and upgraded to b134 up to snv_151a. I also have a WinXP entry in GRUB. This hard disk is partitioned, with a

Hello, Has anyone encountered the following error message, running Solaris 10 u8 in an LDom. bash-3.00# devfsadm devfsadm: write failed for /dev/.devfsadm_dev.lock: Bad exchange descriptor bash-3.00# zpool status -v rpool pool: rpool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data corruption. Applications may be affected. action: Restore the file in

I decided to post this question to the mailing list because it needs ZFS knowledge to be solved. The situation is like this: I have a blade server that boots from a LUN, which has no additional storage or internal disk but that LUN used to boot. MPxIO works perfectly; but the management wants to use EMC PowerPath, because the company already has an investment on licensing. After disabling

I''m currently having a few problems with my storage server. Server specs are - Open Solaris snv_134 Supermicro X8DTi motherboard Intel Xeon 5520 6x 4GB DDR3 LSI RAID Card - running 24x 1.5TB SATA drives Adaptec 2405 - running 4x Intel SSD X25-E''s Boot''s from 8GB USB flash drive The initial problem started after a while when the console showed SCSI timeouts and the whole

We need to move the disks comprising our mirrored rpool on a Solaris 10 U9 x86_64 (not SPARC) system. We''ll be relocating both drives to a different controller in the same system (should go from c1* to c0*). We''re curious as to what the best way is to go about this? We''d love to be able to just relocate the disks and update the system BIOS to boot off the drives in

Using ZFS v22, is it possible to add a hot spare to rpool? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20100929/4b036d1d/attachment.html>