similar to: keytab-lilo included with SYSLINUX is not up to date

Since kbd 2.0.3 (commit 6ff47cf2) the format generated by 'loadkeys -m' has changed slightly, using "unsigned short" instead of "u_short" Signed-off-by: Olivier Brunel <jjk at jjacky.com> --- utils/keytab-lilo | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/utils/keytab-lilo b/utils/keytab-lilo index 9e34160..337a869 100755 ---

> Since kbd 2.0.3 (commit 6ff47cf2) the format generated by 'loadkeys -m' has > changed slightly, using "unsigned short" instead of "u_short" > How this change would affect users with older versions of kbd / loadkeys / or in older OSes? I mean, let's assume a user using a newer version of Syslinux (containing this proposed change in its keytab-lilo

On 29.12.2015 22:51, poma wrote: > On 29.12.2015 22:20, Ady via Syslinux wrote: >> >>> On 27.12.2015 23:57, Jernej Simon?i? via Syslinux wrote: >>>> On Sunday, December 27, 2015, 23:34:11, Ady via Syslinux wrote: >>>> >>>>> How this change would affect users with older versions of kbd / >>>>> loadkeys / or in older OSes? I

On 07.03.2016 19:24, Ady via Syslinux wrote: >> doc: keytab-lilo example on Fedora >> >> --- >> doc/keytab-lilo.txt | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/doc/keytab-lilo.txt b/doc/keytab-lilo.txt >> index cdbea0f..f35b3e8 100644 >> --- a/doc/keytab-lilo.txt >> +++ b/doc/keytab-lilo.txt >> @@ -83,3 +83,7 @@

> On 27.12.2015 23:57, Jernej Simon?i? via Syslinux wrote: > > On Sunday, December 27, 2015, 23:34:11, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > > >> How this change would affect users with older versions of kbd / > >> loadkeys / or in older OSes? I mean, let's assume a user using a newer > >> version of Syslinux (containing this proposed change in its keytab-lilo

On Sunday, December 27, 2015, 23:34:11, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > How this change would affect users with older versions of kbd / > loadkeys / or in older OSes? I mean, let's assume a user using a newer > version of Syslinux (containing this proposed change in its keytab-lilo > perl script) but with an older OS / older version of kbd / loadkeys / > map files. The changed

I am enclosing a context diff of the changes that I made to get openssh working on UWIN. UWIN is a UNIX operating system layer that runs on Win32 systems. For more information on UWIN go to http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/uwin/. I also ran configure using -with-cppflags=-D_BSDCOMP=2. I don't know where that information would go with the source code. Let me know if you need more

Hello all! I would like to know if is possible to use LILO as the boot loader instead of the default GRUB. My question comes because I tried to run lilo command but the message "command not found" appear. It sounds like my only boot loader option in CentOS is GRUB ??. I found lilo.conf.anaconda, but not the lilo command. From already thanks. Regards, Juan P. Espino

> doc: keytab-lilo example on Fedora > > --- > doc/keytab-lilo.txt | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/doc/keytab-lilo.txt b/doc/keytab-lilo.txt > index cdbea0f..f35b3e8 100644 > --- a/doc/keytab-lilo.txt > +++ b/doc/keytab-lilo.txt > @@ -83,3 +83,7 @@ where <kbd> is the name of the keyboard layout. > Example: > >

This is a corrected version of the patch I originally submitted on September 5th, and resubmitted on October 14th. I have removed the changes that added $(CFLAGS) to the link-only invocations of gcc. Otherwise, the patch is the same as before. My thanks to Paul (prj@po.cwru.edu) for noticing my error and kindly correcting me. ** text of original letter, with corrections ** I had to make some

I had to make some patches to rsync to get it to build on VOS. We are a POSIX-96 (but not Unix) system. Here is the subset of the patches that I think are general to all platforms. I have tested these here. I was surprised that CPPFLAGS is not available to the compilation rules in the Makefile. Most other packages (e.g. Samba) seem to allow CPPFLAGS to be set by the user. Since this is how I

** This is a resend of mail I originally sent on September 5th. I am still interested in getting these patches applied, and getting a new config.guess and config.sub. Is there anything else I need to do in order to get these changes accepted? Thanks. PG ** I had to make some patches to rsync to get it to build on VOS. We are a POSIX-96 (but not Unix) system.

On 29.12.2015 22:20, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > >> On 27.12.2015 23:57, Jernej Simon?i? via Syslinux wrote: >>> On Sunday, December 27, 2015, 23:34:11, Ady via Syslinux wrote: >>> >>>> How this change would affect users with older versions of kbd / >>>> loadkeys / or in older OSes? I mean, let's assume a user using a newer >>>>

Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle at tiscali.nl> --- man/extlinux.1 | 6 +++--- man/syslinux.1 | 10 +++------- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/extlinux.1 b/man/extlinux.1 index 3192122..62bf3b1 100644 --- a/man/extlinux.1 +++ b/man/extlinux.1 @@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ about your system and your BIOS; the vast majority of all problems reported turn out to

Where can I get lilo for centos 4.2? I did "up2date lilo*" and nothing was retrieved.

Does there exist a version of Lilo built for x86_64 CentOS 5? It does not seem to be on the DVD. *I* really, really, prefer Lilo over Grub. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software -- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows heller at deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/

This is an updated version of my patches to get rsync to build and run its tests on the Stratus VOS operating system. I have updated this patch to apply cleanly to the current copy of HEAD. I also ran the test suite and discovered that I needed to tweak a few spots in the Makefile to append the executable suffix (VOS is one of the few systems that has a required executable suffix). There are a

I have a Lilo.conf file, which I have tried for many hours to convert to Syslinux. I looked around on the web for references on translating some of the components. I want to convert it to Syslinux/Isolinux. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. When I tried to convert it I made sure that the kernel and initrd had proper DOS names and such. -Michael =:LILO.CONF:= prompt timeout=10

> It is a "generic example" which differs from the "actual example" on Fedora. ;) > Someone may favor wiki style, then again someone graces the source doc style. > What is important, none of them is a redundant, that is, they complement each other. > Patching for Fedora (or for whichever other distro) in upstream Syslinux should only be done when it would affect

I can't choose LILO as boot loader anymore in the install process? And what is the advantages in GRUP vs. LILO that are so great that LILO has been deleted all together? One big disadvantages when forced to use GRUB is that it is a hassle to make the disks in a RAID1 bootable. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-March/msg05935.html and RAID1 seems pretty useless when it is the