similar to: Hijacking threads

I am sorry for hijacking msgs. I didn't realize I was doing that for sure. I hope that this msg appears as a new msg and NOT any hijacked msg. please reply either way k so i can correct it. thx, John Rose

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10936 Bug ID: 10936 Summary: Rsync path hijacking attack vulnerability Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org

Installing from RubyGems.org: gem install --pre unicorn >From db919d18e01f6b2339915cbd057fba9dc040988b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Wong <normalperson at yhbt.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:02:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] unicorn 4.6.0pre1 - hijacking support This pre-release adds hijacking support for Rack 1.5 users. See Rack documentation for more information about hijacking.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1464 Summary: "possible hijacking of X11-forwarded connections" bug has not been fixed completely Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.0p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: security

I've just wasted a day chasing my tail because of subtleties introduced to handle the optionality of the DataLayout. I would like to never do this again. =] We now have this attached to the Module with just a flimsy faked-up pass to keep APIs consistent. So, is there any problem with beginning down the path of: 1) Synthesizing a "default" boring DataLayout for all modules that

On Nov 18, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 11/18/2015 07:31 AM, Tim Evans wrote: >> Would like to hear recommendations here. > > https://www.ixsystems.com/freenas-mini/ For those who don?t know why you?d pay $1000 for a diskless 4-bay NAS box when there are $300-500 boxes that are superficially similar from QNAP, Synology,

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:28:47PM +0000, Patrick Masotta wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:15:10PM +0200, Ady wrote: > > > > Your first email about your efi/udp.c patch seems to be part of another > > email thread, and not a separate email thread as it was supposed to be. > > > > See > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2016-February/thread.html#24866

On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 21:45 +1000, Gavin Unsworth wrote: > This might save somebody some problems: > Centos4 > > Python-ldap-2.0.1-2.i386.rpm *requires* compat-openldap-2.1.30-2.i386.rpm > > It''s not a dependency but it should be. Then it probably ought to be filed in CentOS-4 Bugzilla https://bugzilla.caosity.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=CentOS-4 Sounds like it might be

leanneHi OpenSSH team, I am still able to reproduce this problem with openssh50 code both on hpux. Seems like OpenSSH didn't fix this problem completely. how to reproduce: 1. root at sshpa4# uname -aHP-UX sshpa4 B.11.23 U 9000/800 3267743753 unlimited-user license 2. sshd_config X11Forwarding yesX11DisplayOffset 10X11UseLocalhost no // must not use "yes" to bind

On 10 September 2014 13:09, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > git mirror is located on llvm.org as well... :) d'oh! Should we start planning a wider infrastructure with separate servers for separate functionality? Seems like we're putting all our eggs, apples and oranges in the same basket. cheers, --renato

hmmm...didn't everyone know this ? http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?threadid=129224 oddsock At 02:35 PM 6/3/2003 -0500, you wrote: >Huh? Nullsoft is ditching Winamp 3? Care to elaborate? > >It did seem kinda flimsy :) > >hhhmmm.... > >ml > > > > > > > Winamp3's problems do not end with this simple mod, it has fundamental and > >

I'm using dovecot with the antispam plugin to allow for training, but how do I delete emails once they've been trained? If I delete them from the folder using an email client they get retrained as valid emails when they're moved to the trash folder! D'oh. I'm looking, ideally, for a solution that doesn't need a script to be run per user as I have a number of users using

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17220 Summary: Swfdec does not support Clipboard Hijack Attacks Product: swfdec Version: 0.7.x Platform: x86 (IA32) URL: http://it.slashdot.org/it/08/08/20/0029220.shtml OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: lowest

On 04/12/2016 02:31 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > For example: > > unless => "/usr/sbin/getsebool httpd_can_network_connect | /usr/bin/grep on > &> /dev/null" D'oh! That's what I get for overcomplicating the whole darn thing. :) > > Incidentally one nice trick if you're dealing with potentially changing > multiple booleans and the policy compile

On 04 September 2007, Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner at NASA.gov> wrote: > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:12:34 -0400 > From: Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner at NASA.gov> <snip> > No new partition is needed. VMware virtual disks are created as files > within the hosts OS. That's not a lot of free space to play with, but > enough to

Hi CentOS-Docs Team! I got distracted and didn't re-read the "contribute to the wiki" instructions before sending off a message to this list (I'm subscribed to Docs now for sure!). So my initial message hit the bit bucket 'cause I wasn't subscribed (d'oh!). http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/2015-April/thread.html You'll find a copy of my original

Is everyone else posting to this list getting one of these after each-and-every post? If so, someone please un-subscribe this person: rsivak at tmo.blackberry.net Phil -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: postmaster at tmo.blackberry.net > To: Philip.R.Schaffner at NASA.gov > Subject: Delivery Status Notification(Failure) > Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:32:02 GMT > > Your

Does documentation exist describing how to convert a simple, single disk non-RAID CentOS 5 system to software RAID1 using the CentOS install CD/DVD as a rescue disk? (Assuming not) Is there a need for such? (Assuming need) I volunteer to produce it. -------------------- Ed Heron

On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 23:32 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Hi, > > Phil Schaffner wrote: > > Karanbir provided driver disk images and indicated that kmod drivers > > would be in CentOS-5 Extras, but apparently these never materialized. > > The only src.rpm I could turn up was the last link above, and I did get > > CentOS-5 x86_64 kmod-style drivers to build from

I sort of let things loose on Prototype''s growth for awhile - yet, as the article (found here: http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2007/04/are-130-byte-enought-to-solve.html) came before me, the question arose: ''is the issue considered in Prototype?'' I couldn''t find a bug regarding it: the one in German isn''t counted. ) So I roll it in here. Please