similar to: ext4 in 5.3

I am in the process of migrating from running CentOS 4.8 (32-bit) to CentOS 5.4 (64-bit) on my AMD Sempron(tm) Processor LE-1300 system (it is running CentOS 4.8 32-bit because the disk images are from a previous PIII system), and things are 'interesting' WRT how the Lava Computer mfg Inc Quattro-PCI card is being handled. lspci (on CentOS 4.8 32-bit) yields: 01:0a.0 Serial controller:

I tried booting the paravirt patches on a real machine to see what would happen. It had worked OK under qemu, so I thought it would be worth it. It seems to boot OK, though perhaps fairly slowly, but once it hits usermode it gets into trouble. When starting udevd, the startup script runs MAKEDEV, which seems to get stuck in an infinite loop in userspace. It eventually gets past that part

I can''t boot my PV domU domain using a pv_ops 2.6.30.1 kernel. Using the xenified standard debian kernel (2.6.26, the same as in dom0) in DomU it does boot with pvgrub. Any clues, to what to try or test ? Regards, Sander xm dmesg gives: traps.c:437:d12 Unhandled general protection fault fault/trap [#13] on VCPU 0 [ec=0000] (XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S (XEN) Domain 12

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:56:30AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:06:48PM +0200, Peter Wu wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:55:08PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:42:28AM +0000, Rick Kerkhof wrote: > > > > No, there are not. Here is the recursive directory listing: > > > > > > Are

On 12/20/2011 10:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20111220: drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_backend.c:74:2: error: implicit declaration of function ''xen_initial_domain'' Full randconfig file is attached. -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 10:57:18PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > On 04/03/2014 01:23 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:10:17PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > >>On 04/02/2014 04:35 PM, Waiman Long wrote: > >>>On 04/02/2014 10:32 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >>>>On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 09:27:29AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:

On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 10:57:18PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > On 04/03/2014 01:23 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:10:17PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > >>On 04/02/2014 04:35 PM, Waiman Long wrote: > >>>On 04/02/2014 10:32 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >>>>On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 09:27:29AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:

Setting the IF flag can cause an VM exit. So we should avoid touching the IF flag until absolutely necessary. This patch change the way the paravirt arch_local_irq_restore() works by checking the previous flags value and call arch_local_irq_enable() only if the IF flag was set previously. On a 32 vCPUs KVM guest running the AIM7 five-sec workload, the performance increased slightly from 302136.32

Setting the IF flag can cause an VM exit. So we should avoid touching the IF flag until absolutely necessary. This patch change the way the paravirt arch_local_irq_restore() works by checking the previous flags value and call arch_local_irq_enable() only if the IF flag was set previously. On a 32 vCPUs KVM guest running the AIM7 five-sec workload, the performance increased slightly from 302136.32

Hi, I was wondering what is the current status fro ext4 support in Centos. I've noticed that is marked as dev when I try to use it from the installer. Does anybody have a scary story to prevent using it? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090902/7ba417df/attachment-0001.html>

Is 5.3 and ext4 going to be safe? I have seen a couple reports of data loss using ext4? Has this already been fixed? What does the list recommend? ext3/ ext4? Thought maybe today we would start seeing 5.3 showing up... Looking forward to it. Jerry

grabbed my DVD and did an install. When partitioning the disk I did not see a selection for ext4. Is this enabled after the fact some how? Jerry

Hi, Recently I build a filesystem in a device using mkfs.ext4 but when I tried to mount the device show this error: ??? mount: unknown filesystem type 'ext4' But when I build the same device with mkfs.ext4dev I can mont the device without problem. My doubt is when Centos 5.4 is released if I will have a problem because the partition is ext4dev. Thanks, -- Daniel Bruno

Hi, My gateway/firewall/mailserver machine has been running 2.4.13 for a day or so now. Its basically a stock Linus kernel + ext3-0.9.13 patch (for -pre6, with the rej fixed). I'm getting this in /proc/meminfo: total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached: Mem: 130179072 117489664 12689408 0 46854144 69632 Swap: 1073987584 10907648 1063079936 MemTotal: 127128

Hi all, this is the tenth version of the patch series to introduce upstream qemu and seabios in the xen-unstable build system. Changes to v9: - rename QEMU_UPSTREAM_TAG to QEMU_UPSTREAM_REVISION: we are going to use it with a branch name by default; - set QEMU_UPSTREAM_REVISION to "master" by default; - set SEABIOS_UPSTREAM_URL to git://xenbits.xen.org/seabios.git by default; - add

Hi there Just looking for a way to access the /opt/wine/man[15] pages as typing man 1 wine man 5 wine doesn't work. Thanks in advance QoT

Hi, I'm faced with a very strange behaviour: Centos 6.5 server, Hardware ISCSI HBA from Emulex OneConnect, most recent drivers and firmware from emulex installed. Directly attached a 10G ISCSI Storage from QSan. Two Raid volumes, Raid 5, 8 Disks each at 2 TB so 14 TB each logic raid volume. Both volumes are logged in and usable as sdb and sdc to the server. Formatted with ext4 -m 0 -v

Hey guys, I just implemented very simple and primitive class table inheritance in ActiveRecord. The goal is for this to become mature enough to become a true feature in Rails. Check it out here: http://guest@blog.raylucke.com/svn/inherits_from Here?s how it looks in action: create_table "books", :force => true do |t| t.column "product_id", :integer t.column

Hello, my linux show me that: server2 root # ip route add default scope global nexthop via 192.168.5.1 dev eth2 weight 1 nexthop via 192.168.160.1 dev eth0 weight 1 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument What can I do???? Thanks Matias --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date:

Hi All, I followed the instructions here at http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/setup-fedora-11-pv-domu-at-xen-3-4-1-dom0-kernel-2-6-30-rc6-tip-on-top-of-fedora-11/ However, when I do a "make menuconfig", I cannot see any XEN related configuration options. What am I missing? Thank you. Mr. Teo En Ming Dip(Mechatronics Engineering) BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)