similar to: Email/GroupWare Suite

Everyone, Are there any opensource web based alternatives to squirrelmail. Do any of you use squirrlmail. How do you like it. Greg Ennis

Hello Everyone, I was using OpenGroupware but just hosed my system. Since I'm starting from scratch I would like to know what everyone's using for web based mail. I currently implemented cyrus-imapd and postfix which I used before. I was going to give dovecot a try but it wouldn't start even though it was supposed to be easier. I would like to move my postfix to a chroot but have

Hello all, I've played with both Zimbra and Scalix and they seem quite nice and do pretty much what I want. I'm now at the point where I am considering retiring my trusty old courier-imap service in favour of one of these two, unless of course anyone has any other recommendations or suggestions. I'd probably be doing this inside a centos 4.4 Xen VMs running on centos 5 when it comes

Hi, I'd like to install a groupware server in our institute and looking for a software, which connects samba and the groupware server, for example for authentication (may be LDAP) and (more importent) to see the samba shares (user and groups) in the groupware web-front-end. I've talked this week to the open-xchange people at CeBit, and if I understud them right, the samba integration is

Well, I stumbled onto zimbra.... I have a Scallix system built, but still have some rough edges to try to smooth. Like the way it works with sendmail, no dnsbl's will work as sendmail sees all mail as coming from locohost (scalix). Still battling that one which is when I ran across Zimbra. So, this made me start wondering. Are there other exchange server-like products out there? Has

I really need to either upgrade my Scalix server or replace it. It has to be: Free Integrated with anti-spam IPv6 support optional anti-virus (processing concerns) I don't have to be able to port mail from the Scalix to the new server. Everyone can just POP their mail. I have read a bit about Zimbra, it comes as a tar for rhel 5. No rpm that I can find. I also found SME, I have a LOT

Hi Friends, I am planning to upgrade my mail server from CentOS4.5 to CentOS5. By this, I also planned to replace my postfix mail server with Scalix although the community edition limit me to just 25 premium user, I think it is suffice for us with the remaining user as standard user (with approx. <> 100 users total). Is there a catch on using Scalix based on your experience. I see that

Hi all! I'm thinking on installing OGO on CentOS 4. I've been to download.opengroupware.org but I didn't find any CentOS/RHEL 4 specific rpm packages. I'm wondering, since RHEL4/CentOS4 is based on Fedora Core 3, can I use these packages safely? Has anyone ever tried installing OGO on CentOS 4? Has anyone ever used ogoall-...rpm ? Thankx in advance. Best regards, Pedro

Hi folks. I?m looking for an email server. I have a C7 box already with nginx, PostgreSQL, Sinatra and Ruby. So I don?t want to install PHP, Apache, MySQL, etc. Are there any ways/tutorials to set up a mail server under those restrictions? It would serve multiple domains. Cheers, Bee

Just wondering what the consensus is around the list for a usable groupware product. It doesn't have to be as "fancy" as the integration between Outlook and Exchange...just simple calendaring, ToDo lists, document sharing, contact manager, etc. Has anyone tried opengroupware? It seems to do what I need, but doesn't support Chinese (which would make life a lot easier for my

On 5/12/20 8:45 AM, Michael Hirmke wrote: > Hi Robert, > >> Hi, sorry for top post >> but short answer is ,there is no exchange without outlook, that is what >> makes exchange a good "groupware solution", on windows only. >> So compare it to dovecot makes only small sense..... Have you looked at SOGo for a groupware option? https://sogo.nu/ -- Bob

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Keith Keller" <kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> > To: centos at centos.org > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 11:33:17 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Which is better? Microsoft Exchange 2016 or Linux-based SMTP Servers? > On 2018-07-19, Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote: >> >> Well said. I feel

What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange with that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience? Thanks! jlc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080406/5a469804/attachment-0001.html>

I've mostly got our dovecot+postfix+SOGo+openldap open source groupware replacement working the way I want it to; we're replacing GroupWise in our organization and I'm thrilled to be doing it. I'm supporting about 1,000 active staff users (and another 6,000 student accounts). I've got e-mail and calendar sharing working, and it does what it says it will do, but it is (go

Hi all I recently install Postfix and Dovecot, and so far so good. My assumption was that calendar and address book (similar to Gmail calendar or address book) are part of Dovecot. However I do not see anything concerning them in any of the docs I have read so far. What other software (ideally open source, free) do I need in other to have Calendar and address book so my users can manage their

* Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff <niklaas at kulturflatrate.net>: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:43:16 +0300 > Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > > I've been once in a while over the years thinking about implementing > > CalDAV (and CardDAV) to Dovecot. It might be time to start that soon. > > Does anyone have any suggestions? So far my main goals would

Greetings everyone, I'm new to the list as of today. I just installed Dovecot a couple of days ago for the first time, Debian Lenny Dovecot v1.0.15-2.3. So far I'm pretty impressed. I'm using mbox format with Dovecot auto-deciding to place mail in user home directories, which is great. It works very well with the Win32 Thunderbird 3 client over a small basic 100FDX switched net.

Hi, sorry for top post but short answer is ,there is no exchange without outlook, that is what makes exchange a good "groupware solution", on windows only. So compare it to dovecot makes only small sense..... Am 12.05.20 um 13:24 schrieb Michael Hirmke: > Hi Marc, > > >> How did you decide for the Baikal? I have been testing a long time ago > > it was easy to

Hi all, I have a running Samba4 Server. I am able to authenticate Windows and Linux Clients very. (1) I want to use samba4 as SSO. In this regard my next step is to authenticate our web site users from samba4 server. In this web site, at home page our corporate users give their e-mail address username at companydomain.com and password (not e-mail password). (2) Our E-mail server is hosted on

Hi Timo, >> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "folder1" >> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "folder2" >> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" {9} >> six"wafer >> . OK List completed. >> >> Note the {9} length of the following real folder name. Is this normal >> handling of special folder names ? >Yes. Well,