similar to: CentOS VPN server for iPhone

Hi, I am facing a task of choosing vpn server. I do not know which is better. The one distributed with CentOS4.5 only supports pppd (or maybe pptp but I cannot find it). If* *I want to use PPTP or L2TP, which one should I choose? OpenVPN? Poptop? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

And openvpn. Avoid ipsec as it's too complex and pptp is unsecure. Eero 4.4.2016 9.55 ip. "Richard Zimmerman" <rzimmerman at riverbendhose.com> kirjoitti: > SoftEther VPN > > Once setup, it just works.... > > Regards, > > Richard > > > --- > Richard Zimmerman > Systems / Network Administrator > River Bend Hose Specialty, Inc. > 1111 S

On 04/04/2016 12:11 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > This made me google around a little, and I found some good info here. > They, too, kind of recommend openvpn. > http://www.howtogeek.com/211329/which-is-the-best-vpn-protocol-pptp-vs.-openvpn-vs.-l2tpipsec-vs.-sstp/ > This is not good information. In brief: "There are some concerns that the NSA could have weakened the standard,

Folks I would like to have my windows 7 laptop communicate with my home server via a VPN, in such a way that it appears to be "inside" my home network. It should not only let me appear to be at home for any external query, but also let me access my computers inside my home. I already have this working using M$'s PPTP using my home Centos 6 gateway/router as the PoPToP server.

Hi list, I have to build vpn server for 1500 clients. No encryption necessary. can anyone please recommend me vpn server. I do not have experience on vpn. I have tested openvpn on my test setup, & its working fine. I want to check if there any other vpn server available. I have not checked but can pptp vpn be usefull? My requirement is to connect 1500 clients on vpn server. Need

I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps - Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan packages. What is the current consensus w.r.t. building an IPSec VPN "server" (concentrator, whatever) on CentOS 7, that will do site-to-site connections with Cisco hardware at

On 2015-04-14 11:25, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/14/2015 11:07 AM, Florin Andrei wrote: >> I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there >> are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps - >> Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan >> packages. > > libreswan replaced openswan, and is

Hello, now I have spent many hours to configure openswan for VPN connections without any success. My goal: VPN Server CentOS 6 with public IPv4 VPN Client (= road warrier) from private site with NAT router or from mobile cell with Linux, Windows 7, Mac, iPhone or Android Is there any how to in the net? When I read file:///usr/share/doc/openswan-doc-2.6.32/config.html then I belive, there is

IPSec is not recommended solution nowdays. OpenVPN runs top of single udp or tcp port, so it usually works on strictly firewalled places like in hotels and so on. -- Eero 2016-04-04 23:18 GMT+03:00 Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>: > On 04/04/2016 10:57 AM, david wrote: > >> I have seen discussions of OpenVPN, OpenSwan, LibreVPN, StrongSwan (and >> probably

On 2015-04-14 11:44, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2015-04-14 21:40 GMT+03:00 Florin Andrei <florin at andrei.myip.org>: >> >> http://serverfault.com/a/655752/24406 >> >> If that is accurate, the documentation, and the clustering / load >> balancing might tilt the balance in the direction of strongSwan. >> >> > Well, both packages can do ipsec to

I am looking for the optimal VPN. Well it doens't have to be that elaborate. Just the best VPN. We currently have some customers using PPTP, some using openvpn, some using Cisco Any Connect and there are a few others. So my question is, if you have control of both ends (client and server) what is the best VPN to use? There are not too many requirements, but a big one is The VPN must return

I have a server currently connecting to a pptp remote server. This server(lns\lac) has the option for pptp connections and l2tp connections. The l2tp connections are not using ipsec encryption at all. I have seen couple guides\tutorials on the internet: - https://raymii.org/s/tutorials/IPSEC_L2TP_vpn_on_CentOS_-_Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_or_Scientific_-_Linux_6.html -

Scenario: FreeBSD box running IPFW acting as a gateway to private network. The private network is made up of entirely routeable IP addresses. External users running Win2k and XP on DSL connections with dynamic IPs. Goal: To have the FreeBSD gateway securely authenticate and encrypt the traffic between the outside users and the internal network. I've spent the last 3 days running up and

I've a server running CentOS 5, Samba 3.0.23c and OpenVPN-2.1beta4 A laptop running Vista connects to the server over VPN. The CentOS server is local, domain and preferred master, and also WINS server. It looks like every once in a while the Vista laptop drops the VPN connection, which gets re-established soon after that. But the problem is, it appears that after the dropout the Vista

Hello Mailinglist, please excuse my bad english - but I am not a native speaker. My Network looks like this: Internet --- dyn. IP --- Firewall (shorewall) --- LAN (192.168.X.X) No I try to connect my iphone (from mobile Internet G3) over VPN (l2tp/ipsec) with the firewall. But I can´t open the necessary Port 1701. /var/log/syslog ... Dec 30 00:24:29 router kernel: [226128.293757]

Hey John, I do not require encryption at all, it's a secure and internal channel but it requires me to connect via either pptp or l2tp. This is the reason I am asking. I had the chance of finding the SoftEther Project which gives a lot in terms of VPN Client and Server. At: http://www.softether-download.com/en.aspx But yet to try it. Also they have all sorts of beta versions but not

Hi All, This is a general VPN question; PPTP VPNs seem to be very easy to set up with CentOS as the VPN server and the built-in windose client, but how do list members feel about the security vunerabilities reported with the MS implementation? Specifically the 6 problems reported here : http://www.schneier.com/pptp-faq.html or maybe im being paranoid? Would any of you roll this solution out

I have the following network: External Interface External Interface ccc.ccc.ccc.ccc aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa | | --> VPN <--> Internet <--> FreeBSD Client (NATed extip: bbb.bbb.bbb.bbb) | FW-1 Protected Net ddd.ddd.ddd.ddd/24 VPN: ipsec freeswan (UDP encapsulated tunnel) ccc.ccc.ccc.ccc has port 136/UDP open for

Is there an easy way or anyway to establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between a handful of centos 5.2 boxes? I am not familiar with this at all. Jerry

Hey Gordon, I do not have any security issue in this network. I need to connect to a remote network on a secure network. The options are pptp or l2tp(no ipsec encryption) so I do want to use l2tp like in (lac\lns) and I am looking for a client for CentOS. Note that it works in ubuntu so it is possible to achieve the same with CentOS but I do not know what is behind the gui that initiates the