similar to: session state w/ >1 processes

"Beast" is more appropriate than you know. It''s definately Frankenstein code. (read: it ain''t pretty, but it works - some of the time). Anyway, it entertains my wife; not sure if hardcore programmers will get anything out of it or not. You might find it interesting (or pointless) that in a complete bastardization of rails'' main reason for being it

We are using Rails for a project that must integrate with a legacy database. Is there a way to get Rails to automatically set the timestamp for a column named something other created_on or updated_on ? Also, how does one manipulate the size of the database connection pool? Dennis Byrne -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

When is it possible to set <script>while(true){}</script> as the value of project.name, what it the best way to escape the output of the following? <td><%= project.name %></td> Dennis Byrne -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060713/bbdedb86/attachment.html

I have been frustrated with J2EE technology just like any other developer who has worked in that technology for a long time. This made me learn about Rails and I was excited about RoR. Today I came across JBoss Seam framework and I am not able to contain my excitement. My passion for JEE development is back. It seems like it is better than RoR. I would like to hear differnt opinions about this

If I want to wrap two account updates, the syntax is ... Account.transaction(dennis, david) do dennis.withdraw(10); david.deposit(10); end .. where both dennis and david are instances of Account. Can someone please let me know what the syntax is for starting and ending a *single* database transactions which spans two *different* kinds of models/tables ? Dennis Byrne -------------- next

If the domain''s NUMA node-affinity is being specified by the user/toolstack (instead of being automatically computed by Xen), we really should stick to that. This means domain_update_node_affinity() is wrong when it filters out some stuff from there even in "!auto" mode. This commit fixes that. Of course, this does not mean node-affinity is always honoured (e.g., a vcpu

in _csched_cpu_pick(), as not doing so may result in the domain''s node-affinity mask (as retrieved by csched_balance_cpumask() ) and online mask (as retrieved by cpupool_scheduler_cpumask() ) having an empty intersection. Therefore, when attempting a node-affinity load balancing step and running this: ... /* Pick an online CPU from the proper affinity mask */

>>> Maybe I was wrong, but according to Michael's comment it looks like he >>> want >>> check affinity_hint_set just for speculative tx polling on rx napi >>> instead >>> of disabling it at all. >>> >>> And I'm not convinced this is really needed, driver only provide affinity >>> hint instead of affinity, so it's

>>> Maybe I was wrong, but according to Michael's comment it looks like he >>> want >>> check affinity_hint_set just for speculative tx polling on rx napi >>> instead >>> of disabling it at all. >>> >>> And I'm not convinced this is really needed, driver only provide affinity >>> hint instead of affinity, so it's

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:14 PM, EGO.II-1 <eoconnor25 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/16/2013 10:04 PM, Michael B Allen wrote: >> Broke affinity for irq 27 > Found this online....don't know if it pertains to your issue, but check > it out. > > https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3941 Unfortunately updating the BIOS did not fix the problem (even though the

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:27 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 2017?04?19? 04:21, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >> >> +static void virtnet_napi_tx_enable(struct virtnet_info *vi, >> + struct virtqueue *vq, >> + struct napi_struct *napi) >> +{ >> + if

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:27 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 2017?04?19? 04:21, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >> >> +static void virtnet_napi_tx_enable(struct virtnet_info *vi, >> + struct virtqueue *vq, >> + struct napi_struct *napi) >> +{ >> + if

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:50:12AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >> >>> Maybe I was wrong, but according to Michael's comment it looks like he >> >>> want >> >>> check affinity_hint_set just for speculative tx polling on rx napi >> >>> instead

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:50:12AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >> >>> Maybe I was wrong, but according to Michael's comment it looks like he >> >>> want >> >>> check affinity_hint_set just for speculative tx polling on rx napi >> >>> instead

When in SYS_STATE_suspend, and going through the cpu_disable_scheduler path, save a copy of the current cpu affinity, and mark a flag to restore it later. Later, in the resume process, when enabling nonboot cpus restore these affinities. v2: Fix formatting problems. remove early return in cpu_disable_scheduler() path. v3: Fix remaining errant tab Move restore_vcpu_affinity() to thaw_domains(),

Hi ! I would like to understand where do affinity.spline.coefs used in function compute.affinities come from ? library(gcrma) data(affinity.spline.coefs) affinity.spline.coefs X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X1 -0.55004171 -0.58579091 -0.08870557 -0.47774242 0.23205570 0.58002746 X2 X3 X4 X5 X1 X2

On 12/03/2013 12:52 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > This is about CPU affinity. You may look at CPU pinning with 'vcpupin' > in the manual of virsh. It is possible to enable vCPU pinning in libvirt > guest XML. > > Don't know if libvirt supports applying CPU affinity at guest runtime Yes, 'virsh vcpupin' can be used to change CPU affinity at runtime. > but

Hello, My testing machine has 2 quad-core CPU (It supports hyperthreading, but i disable it in BIOS). I uses Xen 4.0.1 as the hypervisor. When I use 8 VMs to conduct a test, CPU affinity of the VMs is very strange. Like this: vm_name vcpu_num cpu_affinity Domain-0 8 any VM1 4 1,3,5,7 VM2 4 1,3,5,7 VM3 4 1,3,5,7 VM4 4

Hi Lang and Arnaud, I've been testing out the PBQP allocator for Thumb-2 and have ran into a problem I'd love to get your input on. The problem is exemplfied in the codegen for the function @bar in the attached IR file: bar: push {r4, lr} sub sp, #12 (1) movw r2, :lower16:.L_MergedGlobals (1) movt r2, :upper16:.L_MergedGlobals ldm.w r2,

Hello Everyone: We can't create vm on a physical server with 64 CPU(as reported by /proc/cpuinfo). The error message is: "cannot set CPU affinity on process 0" The following is the capabilities detected by libvirt: <arch>x86_64</arch> <model>Westmere</model> <vendor>Intel</vendor> <topology sockets='4'