similar to: Re: Solution to Garry's mod prop crashing problem

Bug 12044 (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12044) really messes up the garry's mod experience so I have made an addon to change the way you die when getting hit by a prop. Download the File =D (http://www.garrysmod.org/downloads/?a=view&id=53943) Now you can drop cars on yourself now!

Hi dere, I switched over from Windows to Linux and I'm loving it. I do have a few problems with Gmod. 1. It won't work. I downloaded Wine after I downloaded Gmod, would that mess it up? Do I have to redownload it? 2. I also downloaded it from Steam, does that affect it? kthnx :D

Hello people of Wine. Let me just say, the developers of Wine, your AWESOME. Keep up the brilliant work, you have helped my transition to Linux become 10 times easier. But, anyway, I have one small issue with Steam games on Wine. Im running Steam as Windows XP and when i go to launch Garry's Mod(Even with -dxlevel 8) it will show up the Launching Garry's Mod window, then nothing comes

Hi, i updated recently to Ubuntu 9.04, first none of source games worked because of Pulseaudio, well i just got rid of that. Now CSS and others work like they did before (even faster in 9.04) but Garry's mod just crashes when joining.

Hey everybody, I'm VERY new at using Wine, so forgive me if this is a foolish question! Recently I've been trying to run the Torchlight 2 Beta under Wine? the game itself runs flawlessly, but in order to get it to run past the beta expiration date I have to run another application (I'm not entirely sure what it is, my belief is that it emulates a server of some sort to play on). No

Dear list, As a reply to my recent mail: > simint and TukeyHSD work for aov objects. > Can someone point me to similar functions for lme objects? Douglas Bates wrote There aren't multiple comparison methods for lme objects because it is not clear how to do multiple comparisons for these. I don't think the theory of multiple comparisons extends easily to lme models. One could

I just realized that in the call to `csimint' the argument `asympt=TRUE' is missing since we need to compute the confidence intervals for a glm based on the normal approximation. Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- library(multcomp) set.seed(290875) # a factor at three levels group <- factor(c(rep(1,10), rep(2, 10), rep(3,10))) # Williams

Dear list members, I want to perform in R the analysis "simultaneous confidence interval for multiple proportions", as illustrated in the article of Agresti et al. (2008) "Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparing binomial parameter", Biometrics 64, 1270-1275. If I am not wrong the R function implementing the Agresti et al. method is prop.test(). I ask an help because I

Hi, I am trying to sort out a discrepancy between power calculations results between me and another statistician. I use R but I am not sure what she uses. It is on the proportions test and so I have been using pwr.prop.test. I think I have tracked the problem down to pwr.prop.test not using the continuity correction for the test (I did this by using the java applet from

The confidence interval calculation in prop.test appears to be incorrect when alternative="greater". The upper limit is always set to 1.000. Am I missing something? > total=c(250,250) > success=c(55,31) > prop.test(success,total,alternative="greater",correct=TRUE) 2-sample test for equality of proportions with continuity correction data: success out of

Full_Name: Richard Johnston Version: 2.4.0 OS: OS X Submission from: (NULL) (69.169.0.241) The confidence interval calculation for prop.test appears incorrect when alternative="greater" . The upper limit is always set to 1.0000. The lower limit appears to be correct. > total=c(250,250) > success=c(55,31) >

Hello, Does anyone know which method from Newcombe (1998)* is implemented in prop.test for comparing two proportions? I would guess it is the method based on the Wilson score (for single proportion), with and without continuity correction for prop.test(..., correct=FALSE) and prop.test(..., correct=TRUE). These methods would correspond to no. 10 and 11 tested in Newcombe, respectively. Can

Full_Name: Robert W. Baer, Ph.D. Version: 1.6.2 OS: Windows 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (198.209.172.106) Problem: prop.test() does not seem to produce appropriate confidence intervals for the case where the vector length of x and n is one. (I am not certain about higher vector lengths.) As an example, I include x=6 and n=42 which has a mean proportion of 0.115. When I calculate the 95% CI

Preparing a paper for a medical journal. Using the prop.test() function in R (v2.4.0) to compare two groups' response to data like the following. A sample of 100 individuals from Population I, 18 with positive readings from a certain test, vs. A sample of 148 individuals from Population II, 61 with positive readings. Results look like this: R version 2.4.0 Patched (2006-11-25

from revision 51769: Index: prop.test.Rd =================================================================== --- prop.test.Rd (revision 51769) +++ prop.test.Rd (working copy) @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ If there is only one group, then the null tested is that the underlying probability of success is \code{p}, or .5 if \code{p} is - not given. The alternative is that the probability of success if

I have a simple table below called temptable and i want to obtain the same structure that prop.table creates except get the counts rather than the proportions. margin.table seems to create one table with columns and rows whereas I am looking for the three table type structure that prop.table gives. Thanks. temptable<-structure(c(0L, 2L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L,

Dear Josh, Thanks for your help! Does your answer mean, that you agree the two methods should do the same, and what I was guessing, despite the small differences? What I prefer about ci.pd is, that the help clearly says which method is implemented, which is not the case for prop.test. But I do not know who has programmed the function. Best wishes Steffi Stefanie von Felten, PhD Statistician

I am using the function prop.test (base package), which returns a list with class "htest". All I want to do is to assign one of its values to a variable, but I do not want R to print the results and added warning message whenever I invoke the function. How can I prevent R from printing on using prop.test? Regards, Jos? Luis Mr Jos? Luis Iparraguirre Senior Research Economist Economic

Dear R-help, > prop.test(9, 137, p=0.066) > prop.test(9, 137, p=0.05) give two different 95% confidence intervals. I thought the confidence interval calculation should be independent of testing calculations (and thus the null hypothesis)? Splus 2000 has similar problems but give slightly different answer. Using R1.3.0 on windows. Mai Zhou

Hi, This code: n=40 x=17 phat=x/n SE=sqrt(phat*(1-phat)/n) zstar=qnorm(0.995) E=zstar*SE phat+c(-E,E) Gives this result: [1] 0.2236668 0.6263332 The TI Graphing calculator gives the same result. Whereas this test: prop.test(x,n,conf.level=0.99,correct=FALSE) Give this result: 0.2489036 0.6224374 I'm wondering why there is a difference. D. -- View this message in context: