similar to: [RFC PATCH 03/35] Add Xen interface header files

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[RFC PATCH 03/35] Add Xen interface header files"

2011 Apr 04
0
[PATCH] linux-2.6.18/backends: use xenbus_be.ko interfaces instead of open-coding them
Also remove unused xenbus_{,un}map_ring(), adjust types, and clean up header inclusion. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> --- a/drivers/xen/blkback/blkback.c +++ b/drivers/xen/blkback/blkback.c @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ #include <linux/list.h> #include <linux/delay.h> #include <xen/balloon.h> +#include <xen/evtchn.h> +#include <xen/gnttab.h>
2006 Nov 14
1
Problem about use XenOprofile
Hi, I want to get the performance data like documents <<Xenoprofoverview&Networking Performance Analysis>> (http://www.xensource.com/files/xs0106_xenoprof.pdf ). But how can I get the modules'' profile in kernel? Now I use command: Opcontrol --no-vmlinux --separate=kernel,cpu --start-daemon ...run benchmark Opcontrol --sutdown Opreport >list The report shows: CPU:
2016 Mar 17
0
Bug#818525: Bug#818525: xen: FTBFS: error: unterminated comment
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Martin Michlmayr <tbm at hpe.com> wrote: > Package: xen > Version: 4.6.0-1+nmu2 > Severity: serious > > This package fails to build in unstable: > >> sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.68.0 (15 Jan 2016) on dl580gen9-02.hlinux > ... >> mkdir -p compat >> grep -v 'DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(long)' public/grant_table.h | \
2016 Mar 17
4
Bug#818525: xen: FTBFS: error: unterminated comment
Package: xen Version: 4.6.0-1+nmu2 Severity: serious This package fails to build in unstable: > sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.68.0 (15 Jan 2016) on dl580gen9-02.hlinux ... > mkdir -p compat > grep -v 'DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(long)' public/grant_table.h | \ > python /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/build/build-hypervisor_amd64_amd64/xen/tools/compat-build-source.py
2012 Aug 16
0
[RFC v1 5/5] VBD: enlarge max segment per request in blkfront
add segring support in blkback Signed-off-by: Ronghui Duan <ronghui.duan@intel.com> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c index 45eda98..0bbc226 100644 --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c @@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ static int xen_blkif_reqs = 64; module_param_named(reqs, xen_blkif_reqs, int, 0);
2007 Dec 06
0
[PATCH] xen: Make xen-blkfront write its protocol ABI to xenstore
Frontends are expected to write their protocol ABI to xenstore. Since the protocol ABI defaults to the backend's native ABI, things work fine without that as long as the frontend's native ABI is identical to the backend's native ABI. This is not the case for xen-blkfront running 32-on-64, because its ABI differs between 32 and 64 bit, and thus needs this fix. Based on
2007 Dec 06
0
[PATCH] xen: Make xen-blkfront write its protocol ABI to xenstore
Frontends are expected to write their protocol ABI to xenstore. Since the protocol ABI defaults to the backend's native ABI, things work fine without that as long as the frontend's native ABI is identical to the backend's native ABI. This is not the case for xen-blkfront running 32-on-64, because its ABI differs between 32 and 64 bit, and thus needs this fix. Based on
2012 Aug 16
0
[RFC v1 3/5] VBD: enlarge max segment per request in blkfront
refactoring balback Signed-off-by: Ronghui Duan <ronghui.duan@intel.com<mailto:ronghui.duan@intel.com>> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c index 73f196c..b4767f5 100644 --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c @@ -64,6 +64,11 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(reqs, "Number of blkback requests to
2008 Mar 24
0
i386 VM on x86_64 host in Xen
>/ On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 22:34 +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: />>/ Just wondering if people had started using i386 Xen DomU's on a x86_64 />>/ dom0 machine with 5.1 as yet ? And just wondering what their experiences />>/ have been. /I thought I would chime in here with my experience. I am running a Cent5.1 x86_64 Dom0 with a Cent 5.1 x386 domU (both fully updated).
2012 Mar 05
11
[PATCH 0001/001] xen: multi page ring support for block devices
From: Santosh Jodh <santosh.jodh at citrix.com> Add support for multi page ring for block devices. The number of pages is configurable for blkback via module parameter. blkback reports max-ring-page-order to blkfront via xenstore. blkfront reports its supported ring-page-order to blkback via xenstore. blkfront reports multi page ring references via ring-refNN in xenstore. The change allows
2012 Mar 05
11
[PATCH 0001/001] xen: multi page ring support for block devices
From: Santosh Jodh <santosh.jodh at citrix.com> Add support for multi page ring for block devices. The number of pages is configurable for blkback via module parameter. blkback reports max-ring-page-order to blkfront via xenstore. blkfront reports its supported ring-page-order to blkback via xenstore. blkfront reports multi page ring references via ring-refNN in xenstore. The change allows
2012 Mar 05
11
[PATCH 0001/001] xen: multi page ring support for block devices
From: Santosh Jodh <santosh.jodh at citrix.com> Add support for multi page ring for block devices. The number of pages is configurable for blkback via module parameter. blkback reports max-ring-page-order to blkfront via xenstore. blkfront reports its supported ring-page-order to blkback via xenstore. blkfront reports multi page ring references via ring-refNN in xenstore. The change allows
2006 Jul 18
0
Re: [RFC PATCH 24/33] Add support for Xen event channels.
Chris, I read with interest your patch for adding support for Xen event channels. I notice that evtchn.h uses an int to represent a port, as demonstrated, for example, in the following two declarations: > +extern void mask_evtchn(int port); > +extern void unmask_evtchn(int port); Using a signed integer is good because negative numbers can be use to return error conditions from functions
2005 Mar 23
9
[patch] final header fixes
I think this is the last of the header fixes I''ve run across. Though it''s sometimes difficult to tell, I believe Xen/ia64 has asm/mm.h, flushtlb.h, page.h, and shadow.h. Please apply. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com> -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center
2012 Nov 15
1
[RFC/PATCH v4] XENMEM_claim_pages (subop of existing) hypercall
This is a fourth cut of the hypervisor patch of the proposed XENMEM_claim_pages hypercall/subop, taking into account feedback from Jan and Keir and IanC, plus some fixes found via runtime debugging (using privcmd only) and some added comments/cleanup. [Logistical note: I will be out tomorrow (Friday) plus US holidays next week so my responsiveness to comments may be slower for awhile. --djm]
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC PATCH 06/33] Add Xen interface header files
In-Reply-To: <20060718091950.075712000@sous-sol.org> On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:00:06 -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > > Add Xen interface header files. > --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 > +++ b/include/xen/interface/arch-x86_32.h Thu Jun 08 19:24:13 2006 -0400 > +#define FIRST_RESERVED_GDT_PAGE 14 > +#define FIRST_RESERVED_GDT_BYTE (FIRST_RESERVED_GDT_PAGE *
2008 Apr 14
1
Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working.
Hi, I got this error when starting a domU on Centos 5.1 i386, Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working. Why is this happening ? I should restart the machine to see if this still happends after a fresh network bridge. But it's somehow a production server, I would like not to restart it, if possible. No domU is currently running. I could start domUs a week ago.
2008 Aug 29
1
Xen HVM and tap:aio
Hello, I'm wondering if anyone out there is doing tap:aio disk devices on a Xen HVM vm with any success. Please let me know if you are, and perhaps your version info and a config file snippet. I've posted this to the xen-users list, and what I'm trying to do seems to be correct, works on Ubuntu, Debian, and XenSource; but it doesn't work on CentOS. Here's the snippet from my
2012 Aug 10
18
[PATCH v2 0/5] ARM hypercall ABI: 64 bit ready
Hi all, this patch series makes the necessary changes to make sure that the current ARM hypercall ABI can be used as-is on 64 bit ARM platforms: - it defines xen_ulong_t as uint64_t on ARM; - it introduces a new macro to handle guest pointers, called XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM (that has size 4 bytes on aarch and is going to have size 8 bytes on aarch64); - it replaces all the occurrences of
2005 Oct 14
0
Confused, xm dmesg output showing header from my source tree
changeset: 7353:29db5bded574 tag: tip user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk date: Wed Oct 12 11:15:02 2005 +0100 summary: Fix 64-bit compile warnings in firmware. UP Dell Precision 330, Centos 4.1 dom0. Should XEN even be accessing anything from the source it was built from? Also had all the domU''s toast right after this, they where running for almost 2 days.