similar to: vdso relocation

Hi Andi, Here's a couple of patches to fix up COMPAT_VDSO: The first is a straightforward implementation of Jan's original idea of relocating the VDSO to match its mapped location. Unlike Jan and Zach's version, I changed it to relocate based on the phdrs rather than the sections; the result is pleasantly compact. The second patch takes advantage of the fact that all the

Hi Andi, Here's a couple of patches to fix up COMPAT_VDSO: The first is a straightforward implementation of Jan's original idea of relocating the VDSO to match its mapped location. Unlike Jan and Zach's version, I changed it to relocate based on the phdrs rather than the sections; the result is pleasantly compact. The second patch takes advantage of the fact that all the

Paravirt-ops guests which move the fixmap also end up moving the syscall = VDSO. This fails if it is prelinked at a fixed address, which is why = COMPAT_VDSO is broken under CONFIG_VMI (and also under CONFIG_XEN). = Several options are available to try to address this. Jan had cooked up = a patch for Xen that used build magic to find the parts of the VDSO that = need relocation. I

Paravirt-ops guests which move the fixmap also end up moving the syscall = VDSO. This fails if it is prelinked at a fixed address, which is why = COMPAT_VDSO is broken under CONFIG_VMI (and also under CONFIG_XEN). = Several options are available to try to address this. Jan had cooked up = a patch for Xen that used build magic to find the parts of the VDSO that = need relocation. I

Hi Andi, What problem do they cause together? There's certainly no problem with Xen+vdso (in fact, its actually very useful so that it picks up the right libc with Xen-friendly TLS). J

Hi Andi, What problem do they cause together? There's certainly no problem with Xen+vdso (in fact, its actually very useful so that it picks up the right libc with Xen-friendly TLS). J

This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which requires mode C code, but less build script changes). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig =================================================================== ---

This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which requires mode C code, but less build script changes). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig =================================================================== ---

This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which requires mode C code, but less build script changes). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig =================================================================== ---

Hi Andi, Four patches: - clean up asm/bugs.h, by moving all the C code into its own C file - split identify_cpu() into boot and secondary variants, so that boot-time setup functions can be marked __init - repost of the COMPAT_VDSO patches with a bit more robustness from unknown DT_tags, and functions marked __init, since all this is boot-time only setup. Thanks, J --

Hi Andi, Four patches: - clean up asm/bugs.h, by moving all the C code into its own C file - split identify_cpu() into boot and secondary variants, so that boot-time setup functions can be marked __init - repost of the COMPAT_VDSO patches with a bit more robustness from unknown DT_tags, and functions marked __init, since all this is boot-time only setup. Thanks, J --

Hi Rusty, I had a look over your 011-paravirt-head.S.patch. I'm struggling to come up with a list of any benefits over having separate entrypoints for each hypervisor. Multiple entry pros: * allows maximum startup flexibility for any given hypervisor * for Xen at least, it's pretty simple * the "what hypervisor am I under" question is answered trivially cons:

On Fri, 14 Sep 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:52 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote: > A couple of architectures (s390, ia64, riscv, powerpc, arm64) > implement the vdso as assembler code at the moment, so they > won't be as easy to consolidate (other than outright replacing all > the code). > > The other five: >

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets at redhat.com> wrote: > Hyper-V TSC page clocksource is suitable for vDSO, however, the protocol > defined by the hypervisor is different from VCLOCK_PVCLOCK. Implement the > required support re-using pvclock_page VVAR as VCLOCK_PVCLOCK is mutually > exclusive with VCLOCK_HVCLOCK at run time. > > Signed-off-by:

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets at redhat.com> wrote: > Hyper-V TSC page clocksource is suitable for vDSO, however, the protocol > defined by the hypervisor is different from VCLOCK_PVCLOCK. Implement the > required support re-using pvclock_page VVAR as VCLOCK_PVCLOCK is mutually > exclusive with VCLOCK_HVCLOCK at run time. > > Signed-off-by:

On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 13:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Subject: [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > > commit 3bbf54725467d604698721384d858b5983b87e8f disables the VDSO for > CONFIG_PARAVIRT kernels. This #ifdeffery was a bad change: the VDSO is > an essential component of Linux, and this change forces all of them to > use

On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 13:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Subject: [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > > commit 3bbf54725467d604698721384d858b5983b87e8f disables the VDSO for > CONFIG_PARAVIRT kernels. This #ifdeffery was a bad change: the VDSO is > an essential component of Linux, and this change forces all of them to > use

Seems to work OK for native and Xen. I had to play a bit with the paravirt-sched-clock patch to deal with the VMI changes. Zach, can you check that it still works? Thanks, J

Seems to work OK for native and Xen. I had to play a bit with the paravirt-sched-clock patch to deal with the VMI changes. Zach, can you check that it still works? Thanks, J

Hi, Hyper-V TSC page clocksource is suitable for vDSO, however, the protocol defined by the hypervisor is different from VCLOCK_PVCLOCK. Implemented the required support. Simple sysbench test shows the following results: Before: # time sysbench --test=memory --max-requests=500000 run ... real 1m22.618s user 0m50.193s sys 0m32.268s After: # time sysbench --test=memory