similar to: R plot window in screen of computer

I've been experimenting some with the graphlets which S-Plus 6.1 has. Is there something similar in R? I've looked through documentations, and at SJava, but haven't found it. (If you don't know what a graphlet is, here's what it appears to be: a graphlet is a binary file that encodes information about a graph. Java uses spgraph.jar to display the graph and allow certain

Just updated the source and now I get the unreachable error again. The JIT doesn't know how to handle a RAUW on a value it has emitted. UNREACHABLE executed at /home/conrado/engines/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JITEmitter.cpp:1542! I think that it's not helpful now, but I can post the program, if you want me to. On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at

Great! It just worked. I was a bit worried about using pointers to call functions because it's a little too overwhelming in a big project, I think. Just for the record, if the function code isn't freed with freeMachineCodeForFunction, I get a segmentation fault during recompileAndRelinkFunction with this stack dump: Running pass 'X86 Machine Code Emitter' on function

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Conrado Miranda <miranda.conrado at gmail.com> wrote: > Great! It just worked. I was a bit worried about using pointers to call > functions because it's a little too overwhelming in a big project, I think. > > Just for the record, if the function code isn't freed with > freeMachineCodeForFunction, I get a segmentation fault during >

Hi, I'm starting use the R Package and I have some .R scripts. How can I run these .R scripts. Conrado

On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Conrado Miranda <miranda.conrado at gmail.com> wrote: > Albert Graef wrote: >> >> The way I do this in Pure is to always call global functions in an >> indirect fashion, using an internal global variable which holds the >> current function pointer. When a function definition gets updated, the >> Pure interpreter just jits the

Hi there. I was trying to rebuild LLVM, this time with Clang, and after getting the last svn version, I got this error during cmake: CMake Error: Error in cmake code at <dir>/llvm/projects/CMakeLists.txt:7: Parse error. Function missing ending ")". Instead found left paren with text "(". The line is "if(NOT (${entry} STREQUAL

Albert Graef wrote: > The way I do this in Pure is to always call global functions in an > indirect fashion, using an internal global variable which holds the > current function pointer. When a function definition gets updated, the > Pure interpreter just jits the new function, changes the global variable > accordingly, and frees the old code. > > Compared to Duncan's

Conrado Miranda wrote: > To implement something that is common in Lisp. Suppose I have a program > that is running and can't be stopped or the cost being stoped is > prohibitive. If I find a better way to run an algorithm, I'd like to > update the running program non-stopping. The way I do this in Pure is to always call global functions in an indirect fashion, using an

Hi there. I've looking libcpu project and some history of the mailing list and got a question: what is the status of the disassembler? I mean, is there someone working on it, what targets does it support and so on. I mean, it would be interesting to be able to "undo" the operations LLVM does, like machine code->LLVM IR. If there's no one working with this right now, I'd

I check system load like so: [root at server cron.daily]# w 10:07:33 up 4 days, 15:01, 2 users, load average: 4.22, 3.17, 3.09 I would like to to graph the 3.17 5 minute average with MRTG. Anyone know of some examples of doing this?

Hm, I wonder if the error message for llvm_unreachable should change. I think I remember a couple people focusing incorrectly on the UNREACHABLE instead of the actual error message above it (which means it's our fault, not theirs). Miranda, this is pointing at the same problem you had before. You have a function JIT-compiled, and you're trying to RAUW (ReplaceAllUsesWith) it. You'll

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Conrado Miranda <miranda.conrado at gmail.com> wrote: > First, you have to call llvm-g++ to use the llvm-gcc front end, but it > doesn't matter here. I got the compile command from the Kaleidoscope documentation. > I'd like to suggest that you use pastebin to put your code and the send us > the link, so that we can download it. The

http://dovecot.org/test/ - Several mbox fixes, upgrade recommended for test68 mbox users - Possibly fixes some IMAP hangs where Dovecot just stopped replying - Fixed delay-newmail workaround. It was badly broken before. And somewhat off topic advertisement: I got a bit distracted from Dovecot a week ago when a guy started mailing me about wanting to write an irssi2 client as a project to

Upon finding a different image conversion program, I have eliminated the Premature EOF problem that I had(apologies if I post this before the moderator approves my first post...you can ignore it if/when it shows up). Now, I am seeing the script complete with no error. I tested my syslinux.dpy file with the syslogo.lss file from the samples, and it's fine. The lss file I created, however,

Hi Duncan, > I couldn't find the solution to my problem (if it has one) in the mailing >> list or the source code. The problem is: how can I redefine a function >> that's been called already by some other function? >> > > why do you want to do this? > To implement something that is common in Lisp. Suppose I have a program that is running and can't be

Fix internal ppmtolss comment and man page describing ppmtolss syntax with color index Fix typo s/freqency/frequency/ in comment Not so sure it will not be mangled, so it's also as attachment. Signed-off-by: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp at free.fr> diff --git a/man/ppmtolss16.1 b/man/ppmtolss16.1 index 954e94b..5be3263 100644 --- a/man/ppmtolss16.1 +++ b/man/ppmtolss16.1 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@

From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming at intel.com> Since we can't use __intcall() for EFI, and since we can now have the ELF module code resolve all our symbols at runtime, we should delete as many references to __intcall() as possible and just access the symbols directly. The most interesting patch is the support for weak symbols. We need to be able to reference derivative-specific

In Syslinux-5.00, is the goal that the core and .c32 modules alike will use the same heap? There is a bug I am thinking about: - QEmu with 1024 MiB RAM - Syslinux 4.06 - .c32 can realloc() up to 1013 MiB - QEmu with 1024 MiB RAM - Syslinux 5.00-pre9 - .c32 can realloc() up to 45 MiB I am wondering if there's a maximum-allocation-size being hit, or if it's actually a bug I should look

OK, this is a long date problem I'm having. A Windows XP machine is accessing a Samba server. Some Samba sharings are mapped to drive letters on Windows XP. Sometimes, in randoms intervals of minutes to hours, all drives get disconnected and this message appears if I try to access the mappings from Windows XP: -------- An error occurred while reconnecting (drive letter) to \\computer\\share