similar to: [Bridge] Bridging on Sparc64

Santiago, I appreciate your offer. I'm not really a kernel hacker, however I do know C and I would be willing to try if you point me in the right direction. Here is my first attempt using Debian running on an UltraSPARC: debian{root}:/root<512>strace -f -F -v brctl addbr br0 execve("/usr/sbin/brctl", ["brctl", "addbr", "br0"], [/* 16 vars */]) =

Hiyas, Is there a patch for the 2.4.x series to do ip6tables bridging of IPv6 packets? I was unable to go to 2.6 due to issues with large packets so still living in 2.4 land. If there are no patches, any ideas on what gets patched in IPv4 to allow this bridging? -Scott __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!

On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 03:51:57 -0600 Sean Reifschneider <jafo@tummy.com> wrote: > Greetings. I've been experimenting with bridging an ethernet device > with an ethertap device (using the Linux tun/tap driver). This is > running with the bridge code in the Linux kernel version 2.4.20 as > provided by Red Hat (2.4.20-18.9). I also seem to have seen the problem > with

Hi, ppl, I am using kernel 2.4.25 and having this peculiar problem on my ixp425. When i have 2 ethernet ports of the board connected to the same linksys switch running STP. ixp0 and ixp1 are the name of my ethernet ports enslaved to the same bridge( br0)and my PC is also connected to the switch. IXP425 -br0 (192.168.2.1) |_ixp0|--- |

Hi all, I have a bridging firewall running fine with kernel 2.4.31 (Slackware 10.1) and iptables 1.2.11 Yesterday I install the new kernel 2.6.14.3 and iptables 1.3.4 but the bridging firewall doesn't work anymore. Do I need to patch the kernel 2.6 as what I did it for kernel 2.4? Or what I have missed? Regards, ro0ot

Hello all, First thanks to all for helping me. I have an issue to bring up bridging isis packets using BRCTL. As i am quite a newbie, maybe this is not possible or maybe I forget to load modules so that the bridging I am trying to put in place work properly. Here is the configuration I used: I1 ------ eth1 (physical interface of my linux machine) ----------- BRIDGE ----------- n1-eth0 (tuntap

Hi all! I'm trying to make a transparent shaper with kernel 2.6.11 I have done this and used it many times on 2.4.25 kernel and ebtables-brnf-5_vs_2.4.25.diff On 2.4.25 I have been using U32 classifiers and HTB. On 2.6.11 even with : newserver ~ # zcat /proc/config.gz | grep -i BRIDGE_NETFILTER CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER=y newserver ~ # ls /proc/sys/net/bridge/ bridge-nf-call-arptables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=474 Summary: nf_conntrack marks all packets as INVALID on sparc64 (probably endianness bug) Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

I have read several articles for setting up a network bridge. My configuration is: WorkStation --> Switch0:VLAN1 --> Switch1:VLAN1 --> bridge --> Switch1:VLAN45 --> Laptop I am running CentOS 4.3 on the bridge #> brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.0030843e5aa2 no eth1

I put a bridging firewall together last winter (with some help) and have it= in production in front of a couple windows web and mail servers for going = on 6 months now. I used Fedora C1 with 2.4.22 kernel and 0.9.6 bridge-utils= . The bridge has solved a lot of security headaches. I use a modified start= up script written by David Whitmarsh that has worked really well. http://ww=

Hi, I'm trying to setup a bridge with a bonded device (2 links, balance-rr). The problem is that after attaching the bonded device to the bridge the network throughput drops down from 110MB to 100KB. This seems to be due to the MAC address of internal devices of the bridge being seen on the external ports, where the bonded device exists (see also the URLs below). An arp packet from some

TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - tinderbox 2.20 running on worker01.tb.des.no TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - FreeBSD worker01.tb.des.no 9.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon Jun 17 11:42:37 UTC 2013 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - starting RELENG_10 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - cleaning the

Is it possible to bridge multiple "tap" interfaces in Linux? When two tap interfaces are bridged together they are unable to "see" each other but they can bridge to external Ethernet interfaces or the hosts IP attached on the bridge. I saw some mention in the mailing list archives on bridging two user space processes but it didn't seem to have any conclusion. I also

Hi all, I have got one query on QoS in bridging in Linux My question is, when we define IP QoS ( using a tc command ) queuing discplines and classses, will these be applicable to bridged frames also ? I mean the packets that take IP path will be sent out according to QoS we defined, but the bridged/ swithced packets will also be sent according to this defined IP QoS classses ? My doubt is

Hello, In one of our project we need to connect one IMX 27 based baord which ahs a internal FEC controller & an MPC 8323RDb baord which has a Built in Network controller. We need to connect the IMX27 based board to MPC board thro cross cable & MPC baord has wlan AP card . Basically we want to communicate from IMX27 to wireless network. Hence we are planning to make follwoing arranage

Hi, I'm relatively new to linux world.I'm just trying to setup a bridge firewall between a router and LAN. I've installed Red Hat Linux 9.0 - 2.4.20-8 from installation CDs and upgraded to 2.4.25 successfully. I've patched my kernel to support bridge firewall also loaded ebtables module,so far so good.Now I tried to create a bridge using the code given in the following link

The parts of klibc specific to the sparc64 architecture. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> --- commit f30fa3db62972125afa68d3b53d03cdb843d3bbd tree f2d942e281dce8bb98d4fa84b7e431c7beaddfc4 parent 1b5c93603ed3460ed1fba9e5d453a6fa54d0ccce author H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:58:50 -0700 committer H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun

On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:50:15 +0100 "Andre Santos \(Ecofilmes\)" <andre.santos@ecofilmes.pt> wrote: > Hi there, > > I want to have a computer betwen the internet and the network to see the trafic and control. > I used windows, but its somehow limited, and want to try linux... > I installed Fedora linux in server mode, and now Im trying to put 2 nics in bridge.

Greetings (first post to the list)... The following patch is required to allow bridging to occur on an IBM x305 (1RU server). (It has been posted to the kernel-developers mailing list previously.) Background: - The Dual Broadcom NICs in the IBM x305 have a broken checksum routine which wants to calculate the checksum the ethernet packet where the 'source' IP address is the IP

TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:32 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:32 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_7/sparc64/sparc64/supfile TB ---