similar to: [Bridge] bridge/nf/ebtables patch for 2.4.27?

Hi all! Several times now I have seen the following: fsck-ing the ext3 fs I get hundreds (if not thousands) of messages: Indoe NNNN, i_blocks is K, should be (K-8). FIXED: Interestingly the difference is *always* *always* *always* 8. Can someone explain me what was going on? Why this? Thanks a lot and all the best Norbert

Hi rsync gurus! [Please Cc: me, as I am NOT subscribed to the list!] First the data points: debian/woody, local server=i386 arch, remote is alpha arch rsync version on both debian 2.5.5-0.2 While upgrading our server to a raid we were hit by a bug which I really consider very strange: The option -n/--dry-run does NOT change files, but DELETE files when called with --delete. Test case I had: $

Hi! I was testing 2.6.0-test5, but got lots of journal aborted errors. Then I Sysrq-s/u/b and wanted to boot 2.4.23-pre3 or 2.4.22, but ext3 error: cannot find root fs cannot mount because of unsupported optional feature (4) after trying to mount it with ext2 (rootfstype=ext2, not working) I rebooted again into 2.4.22, this time there was just severe fs corrpution, illegal blocks, inodes,

Hi all! I have a slight problem: I have an external disk which contains one big filesystem (like a floppy) type ext3 (If you ask why: blame udev or maxtor, or me because I am stupid) which is approx 60% filled. Now I want to have a partition table, ie a layout where the current filesystem is the first partition, and the rest is as usual. Is this possible withotu destroying the data? Best

There's a new set of ext2/3 patches for 2.4.21-pre5 available at: http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/extfs-2.4-update/extfs-update-2.4.21pre5-2 and in broken out form at: http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/extfs-2.4-update/broken-out-2.4.21pre5-2 New to this patch set include: * A kludge to help htree work well with Linux's NFS implementation * Allow the orlov allocator to be disabled via a

HI list! We regularly experience kernel Ooops on our alpha SX164 with ext3 on md on ide controller: No modules loaded, lsmod empty, self compiled kernel ksymoops 2.4.5 on alpha 2.4.25. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.4.25/ (default) -m /boot/System.map-2.4.25 (default) Warning: You did not tell me where

Dear all, (please Cc) yesterday I had two bugs with btrfs and ext3 occurrences, always happening when plugging in an external USB btrfs disk. Today I had a BUG which is purely ext3 related. The last bug was with yesterdays latest git checkout. Here are the three bugs/oops: that one was with 3.0.0-rc2 (exactely) Jun 10 14:50:23 mithrandir kernel: [40871.704129] BUG: unable to handle kernel

+ CBL mailing list On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:08 AM Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > [Adding the correct cfe-dev mailing list address.] > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:06 AM Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Now that ASM goto support has landed, Nick Desaulniers and I wrote up a >> document describing how to expand clang's

What about SelectionDAG representation? Currently we expand callbr to INLINEASM_BR and BR. Both of which are terminators. But in order to support outputs we would need to put CopyFromReg nodes between them. ~Craig On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:18 PM Nick Desaulniers via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > + CBL mailing list > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:08 AM Bill

I think this is fine, except that it stops at the point where things actually start to get interesting and tricky. How will you actually handle the flow of values from the callbr into the error blocks? A callbr can specify requirements on where its outputs live. So, what if two callbr, in different branches of code, specify _different_ constraints for the same output, and list the same block as a

[Adding the correct cfe-dev mailing list address.] On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:06 AM Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > Now that ASM goto support has landed, Nick Desaulniers and I wrote up a > document describing how to expand clang's implementation of ASM goto to > support output constraints. The work *should* be straight-forward, but as > always will need to

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 1:44 PM Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 1:29 PM James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> > wrote: > >> I think this is fine, except that it stops at the point where things >> actually start to get interesting and tricky. >> >> How will you actually handle the flow of values from the callbr

Hi, I have encountered an issue which seems to be a serious reproducible bug in LLVM-GCC 4.2. It can be reproduced by compiling the following C++ file that uses boost:#include "boost/statechart/event.hpp" using namespace std; class EvActivate : public boost::statechart::event< EvActivate > { public: EvActivate(){} private: }; extern "C" const void*

Hello, Does someone have an nf-hipac patch for 2.6.20 kernel ? Regards

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1266 Bug ID: 1266 Summary: bridge-nf-filter-pppoe-tagged mtu bug? Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Hardware: All OS: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: bridging Assignee:

hello,everyone I have installed bridge-utils.I want to combine bridge and iptables.But I can't get bridge-nf-0.0.7-against-2.4.18.diff . Who can tell me where i can get it? thanks! ???????? ???????? cd_xcl@sina.com

Hello List, Are there any known issues in using the bridge-nf patch for kernel v2.4.28 against 2.4.29 or can it be used in production environments? is there already an adopted version of the patch for 2.4.29? Sorry if this question has already been answered elsewhere (I didn't find something useful on google, cvs and the list). Thanks, Marc

Good Morning, do excuse me, but has the development been abandoned for the kernel 2.4.x? Regards, Claudio Mantegna This e-mail is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any review, dissemination, copying, printing or other use of this e-mail by persons or entities other than the addressee is prohibited. If

Hi, Just released the patch vs 2.4.22. It's untested, but should work. See: http://sourceforge.net/projects/ebtables/ cheers, Bart

I'm a new user of Ubuntu 9.04 and have installed Wine 1.1.28. Have not been able to get Trackmania Nations Forever 2.11.11 to start despite the AppDB indicating it should be fine. Installer worked fine, but program crashes on startup with an error message saying "Application has encountered a serious error and needs to close". Dump file indicates an unhandled exception. First