similar to: [Bridge] Bridge not working with jumbo frames

The documentation says the bridge will work as far as all interfaces have the same MTU, but I also read on this and other mailing lists people having problems when using jumbo frames. What is the current status of jumbo frames support in the bridge? It could also be useful to have the same info on the wiki page. Thanks. -- Luca Lesinigo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi there, I got a question regarding throughput performance using linux 2.4.5.1. My setup is very simple : I have two laptops with a wireless card. On each laptop I configure the wireless cards to be in ad hoc mode, create a bridge and include the interface within the bridge (stp is off). Then of course I'm assigning an IP address to the bridge while assigning 0.0.0.0 to the wireless

Hi there, I was asking this question already a few days go, but I'm not sure whether anyone noticed due to the mailserver outtage. So I'm just re-posting it, sorry, but it's an important issue for me, I would be glad to hear some insight on this. The question is regarding throughput performance using linux 2.4.5.1. My setup is very simple : I have two laptops with a wireless card.

Hi everyone, I have looked through the list archives and seen a few posts about jumbo frame support, but there is no definitive answer on whether or not it has been tested or is working for anyone. I tried using an MTU of 9000 in a domU and encountered some very interesting and not-so-great results. My machines used in this test are: * NFS (physical) * dom0 (physical) * domU (virtual)

Hi, Has anyone using CentOS 6 been able to successfully set an mtu larger than 9710 on an interface. I am seeing super jumbo frames with length > 10000. ... IP 10.79.4.53.64327 > 10.79.2.53.24294: Flags [.], seq 16060:29200, ack 1, win 32767, length 13140 ... CentOS release 6.7 (Final) Thanks, -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.* Director of Technology Phone:

On 11/09/2015 12:36 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 11/09/2015 08:34 AM, Steve Clark wrote: >> Has anyone using CentOS 6 been able to successfully set an mtu larger >> than 9710 >> on an interface. > Maximum frame size varies from implementation to implementation: > http://pages.uoregon.edu/joe/jumbo-clean-gear.html > > It's also worth noting that that due to

When using OCFS2 in a Oracle RAC set, one would configure OCFS2 to use the private interconnect address ( in cluster.conf). Are there any known issues / reasons not to have the private interconnect set up for jumbo frames when using in conjunction with OCFS2 ? Thanks -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, I have 2 network cards on my 2 of my computers that I am trying to transfer data on. The second network cards are specifically for transferring files between the two so I enabled jumble frames by setting the mtu to 9000. I seem to be able to connect between the two via ssh and other methods using this setting so I thought everything was working right until I tried rsync. I used the

We have a cluster (212 nodes) that are on a gig-e network useing jumbo frames (mtu 6000) To reload a node we have to plug it into a regular 1500 mtu that is running off a differnt port on the head node to install. Is there a way to tell in the 'append' line of /pxelinux.cfg/default to have the bcm5700 module run wiht jumbo frames. this is our append right now append load_ramdisk=1

On 11/09/2015 08:34 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > > Has anyone using CentOS 6 been able to successfully set an mtu larger > than 9710 > on an interface. Maximum frame size varies from implementation to implementation: http://pages.uoregon.edu/joe/jumbo-clean-gear.html It's also worth noting that that due to offloading features in modern NICs, there's often very little benefit

Hi, Increasing MTU beyond 1500 in Linux dom0 results in ooopses. I did not find any statement whether 2.0 series support jumbos or not in dom0. Does it? TIA, Teemu -- _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi all, I've just upgraded my home network to a Linksys SRW2024 (with lovely vlan trunking support!) and I'm trying to enable jumbo frames. When I try to set the MTU of an rtl8169 based network card (it's a Netgear RA311), it comes up with an error stating: # ifconfig eth1 mtu 9000 SIOCSIFMTU: Invalid argument The only options it will take are 1500 or below. Does anyone know

Hi all Is it possible to configure jumbo frames (mtu=9000) on a kvm guest using virtio drivers? Thanks. -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com

Author: mabloom Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 39c5623029b347adbf2ab92400d25328f7b321ee Log message: 5084264 Error messages output when configure jumbo frames using bge.conf Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/io/pci_pci/pci_pci.c

Hi, ¿ I would like to know how can I use Gigabit Jumbo Frames inside Xen ? I''ve set my eth0 and peth0 mtu to 7000 My question is : Do I should set the mtu inside each domU ? Regards _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi. Is subj supported or no? If yes, then how? Thanks.

I was trying to do some performance testing between using iSCSI on the host as a diskfile to a guest vs the VM guest using the iSCSI device directly. However, in the process of trying to establish a baseline performance figure, I started increasing the MTU settings on the PCI-express NICs with RTL8168B chips. First bottleneck was discovering the max MTU allowed on these is 7K instead of 9K but

Hello all, Not sure if I am completely missing something but here goes. I have XCP 1.0 running without any issues. I have the mtu set on both the storage network, the corresponding PIF, and the VIF to 9000 and when displayed in ifconfig it shows that this is indeed true. I have several CentOs 5.6 VMs running in HVM mode (i.e. no xen kernel) which attach to the the storage network through these

Hi, I have an XCP 0.5 box running a few DomUs some of the DomU''s data is stored at (clustered lvm volumes on) a Coraid etherdrive box which is connected via an Ethernet cable to a dedicated card of the XCP box, for which in the network config I'' ve specified: MTU=9344: xe network-param-list uuid=.... gives: MTU ( RW): 9344 on the DomUs if I leave the MTU at 1500 (default

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:41:59 -0800 "Awasthi, Vinay K" <vinay.k.awasthi@intel.com> wrote: > Stephen, > > I am running a bidirectional test after adding 2 adapters to the bridge. > I am seeing that rate at one port is higher that the other. This does > not happen when I run uni-directional traffic on either adapter. My > configuration is as follows. > Is the