similar to: [Bridge] Hi everybody

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "[Bridge] Hi everybody"

2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Spanning tree code
Hi I'm looking for code that implements the 802.1d spanning tree. Do you have an idea where can I download this code? Thanks Yossi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20050818/692b471a/attachment-0002.htm
2001 Sep 20
1
Hi everybody - we''re back
Dear list members, all 707 of you, We are back. It has taken *far* too long to get everything together again. At first we were delayed by incredible incompetence over at our vendor, who managed to ship a broken server twice. And then I was very busy, and did not manage to make time for reinstalling all services on the new server. The new server, http://outpost.powerdns.com, is very capable. It
2006 Nov 09
2
Hi everybody! Greetings from sunny Columbus, OH!
Hey everyone, I just wanted to drop onto the list and say hi. My name is Chad Humphries and I am a partner at a ruby and rails shop in Columbus, OH called EdgeCase. Up until two months ago we were doing all of our dev work in test:unit. I had read about RSpec before and after hearing Jim Weirich speak at the Columbus Ruby Brigade about similar ideas I decided to give it a go for a
2006 Jun 03
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux@x86
I don't think anyone has successfully built llvm-gcc4 on Linux yet. I've tried and failed. The instructions in CFEBuildInstrs.html are for llvm-gcc3 and probably won't work as-is. Reid. On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 19:39 +0300, Yossi Kreinin wrote: > Hi! > > Apparently there are no precompiled binaries for llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux. > > I've tried downloading the sources
2006 Jun 03
5
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux@x86
Hi! Apparently there are no precompiled binaries for llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux. I've tried downloading the sources and building according to http://llvm.org/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html (except I'm not an elite gcc hacker). I tried following the guidelines and got what looks like a gcc for x86 with no traces of LLVM. I tried passing --enable-llvm with various llvm root pathnames and got ICEs.
2006 Sep 10
1
[LLVMdev] #line directives in llvm-gcc
Hi! Apparently llvm-gcc ignores #line directives in source files when generating debug information. When I compile this: //test int f(int a) { #line 1 "someplace" return a*a; } //end with `llvm -g -S lines.c`, `someplace' is not mentioned in lines.s. It also looks like functions #included from header files get attributed to the #including file (albeit at the right line number).
2002 Jul 17
1
(no subject)
Hello everyone two small questions with hopefully short answer. 1)How can I send simultaneously a massage to all members on the network using smbclient??? 2)smbtar does not back-up files and folders with hebrew names for those files/folders so....? Thanks: Yossi Shani -> shaniy@actcom.co.il
2009 Sep 17
5
"this" variables being overridden?
Hi I encountered this problem a few times in the past, but only now it is consistent enough so I can write this email. In short, the problem is that after I copy some structure from the profiled program to the dtrace space, and set a "this-dataP" variable to point to the local copy, after a while some of the fields of the local structure are overridden with junk values. In
2004 Sep 03
2
arima et graphique
bonjour, je rencontre quelques soucis au niveau de l'utilisation des fonctions arima.forecast/predict; en effet elles sont dites inconnues alors que j'ai bien install?? et charg?? le package "ts". Aussi, j'aimerai savoir comment visualiser le graphique des pr??visions avec arima et celui des donn??es brutes dans la m??me fen??tre. Tout en vous souhaitant bonne r??ception
2006 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] Placing globals in specific sections
Hi! The LLVM Bytecode File Format specifies an optional SectionID attribute for globals. I didn't find a matching attribute in the LLVM source code. Code such as: int a __attribute__ ((section ("A_SECTION"))); compiles with llvm-gcc, but apparently the section information is stripped (the object file doesn't contain "A_SECTION"). Is the SectionID feature
2006 Sep 12
1
[LLVMdev] reporting LLVM bugs
Hi! A (small) tar archive with files exposing an apparent LLVM optimizer bug is attached; I didn't find a way to attach files in the bugzilla interface. What's the best way to report bugs taking several files to reproduce? -- Yossi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bugreport.tgz Type: application/x-gtar Size: 2242 bytes Desc: not
2006 Aug 11
1
[LLVMdev] instruction scheduling for stack machines
Hi! I'm working on an LLVM back-end for a processor with a stack machine architecture. After experimenting with code generation directly from the LLVM representation, I'm studying the target-independant code generator. As far as I understand, there currently exists a target-independant infrastructure for legalization, instruction selection, scheduling and register allocation. It is clear
2003 Nov 13
2
Couple of Questions for Australian Users!
Just a couple of questions for Aussie users/resellers! I have only just started to look at asterisk a couple of weeks ago and have found some very intresting discussions and some useful info on what can and can?t be done with it and technology. The questions i have is, Are there people using it is Aussie?( I would say yes so prob answered my own question ) :) Hardware, is the digium
2006 Jun 07
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux@x86
Hmm, today I just tried compiling the llvm-gcc 4.0 frontend again on linux (Fedora Core 3 I believe) and I seem to be suddenly having the problem that Yossi Kreinin mentioned. The frontend seems to be using normal gcc to compile as I no longer get a bytecode file after compilation. When I pass the --version argument it claims to be the LLVM 4.0.1 frontend. Any ideas what might cause this? It was
2012 Dec 24
0
[Bridge] Does linux support per vlan stp
Hi, I want to connect two pc`s on a redundant way with each other. On those pc`s a 64 bit ubuntu 11.10 is running with kernel version 3.0.0-16-generic. Setup1: ---------- PC1: PC2: br0 br1 | | -- eth0.1000 ---------------------------------------------------eth0.1000 | | __eth1.1001
2010 Mar 09
2
Problem with mean
Hi all, I got one intresting problem with caliculating mean that is while i am taking mean of values *0.6, -0.8, 4, -3.8* using *val<-c(0.6, -0.8, 4, -3.8)* *mean(val)* it given result as *2.775558e-17* but the actual result is *"0"* can any one suggest how can I get correct mean result in this case can any one suggest how I can farward thanks in regards kiran [[alternative
2006 Jun 07
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux@x86
Hi John, llvm-gcc4 by default emits object files, just as gcc does. This is by design. If you want to get bytecode output you need to use the --emit- llvm-bc option. A complete list of the options that llvm-gcc4 supports can be obtained with "llvm-gcc -v --help" (lots of output). Here are the descriptions of the --emit-llvm options: -emit-llvm Emit LLVM code to the
2011 Mar 08
2
Comment creer un formulaire maitre-detail
Salut a tous! Est-il possible de creer un formulaire maitre-detail? J''ai besoin de creer une fenetre ou l''utilisateur rentre un commande et les differents produits associaes a cette commande. Puis-je afficher le tout dans une seule page? Faut-il un minimum de 2 pages Comment visualiser le detail de la commande avec tous les produits commandes, et l''imprimer si
2003 Oct 29
3
Channelbanks for use in europe (Sweden)
Hi! Is there anyone that are using a E1-channelbank and have any tips about some type? Im looking at the TE410P and use one port for a PRI (Euro-ISDN, I think we're using some slightly modified version here in Sweden, but I'll check that tomorrow) and connect one port to a channelbank for 30 analogue telephones. It would also be great to get callerid on the analogue phones, so it would
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] help setting up a linux bridge with spanning tree to allow multiple vlans accross multiple uplinks
For easy reading: http://www.karthaus.nl/r/ Hi, We used to have 1 single ip range (1.1.1.0/24) that had one uplink to a = switch of the colocation provider. Recently we got a second range 2.2.2.0/24 and a redundant uplink = directly on two routers. But our switch does not have spanning tree = protocol support so we cannot use them redundantly. We have set up the switch to have a vlan for both