similar to: [Bridge] device eth0 is already a member of a bridge; can't enslave it to bridge Net6

Hello list, I'm setting up a virtual network consisting of several UMLs (User Mode Linux) connected with the virtual bridge. Communications works quite well between the host and the virtual machines. Setup: 2 UMLs connected via tap-devices to the bridge (tap1,tap2). The host uses the bridge-device br0 to talk to the clients. Now I want to tcpdump the traffic between host and UML1 on virtual

I have a problem with libvirt and serial ports. When I run a xml with serial tag over libvirt0.8.0 and qemu 0.11 this is the line that libvirt execute LC_ALL=C PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/bin QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=none /usr/bin/kvm -S -M pc-0.11 -cpu qemu32 -enable-kvm -m 0 -smp 1 -name uml2 -uuid 431cb9f4-fdba-c4e8-a35f-23b52f91120a -monitor

Yes, List, I am an UML user that already have a real machine running 8 UML for: UML1..UML4 are used for connection to one leased line that is used for incoming/outgoing mail and incoming webmail accesses: UML1=internal firewall, connected to internal LAN UML2=mailrelay/dmz UML4=webrelay/dmz UML3=external firewall, connected to the NET UML5 and UML6 are used for connection to one ADSL line

Hi all, i need config xen with this ___________ __________ |VM1 |----------------bridge1-------------------| | |__________ | | | ____________ | |-----BALBLA |VM2 |

Hi, I am trying to set up a bridge that connects 2 user mode linux (UML) machines. The bridge lets ARP traffic through, but not the IP traffic. linux:~ # brctl showmacs br0 port no mac addr is local? ageing timer 2 00:ff:7d:86:06:47 yes 0.00 3 00:ff:bc:de:07:76 yes 0.00 2 fe:fd:c0:a8:00:03 no

Hi, we're running the standard linux bridge setup (redundant bridge) for 5 years now. So first of all, thanks to everyone involved for implementing the bridging feature in Linux. Now I'm trying to bridge hosts connected to VLAN'ed Cisco switches using linux bridge. I'm testing the following setup (Kernel 2.6.19, bridge-utils 1.2 on both bridges)

Hi all, I want to create a bridge (see picture below) between 2 LANs with the same IP range (192.168.0.0/24) using 2 wireless links that use load sharing over multiple interfaces (as descibed here: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.loadshare.html) for load balancing and fault tolerance. Both links should use IPsec for encryption. I have googled for an example that does this but I could not find it.

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 07:01:36PM -0800, Jacob Pan (Jun) wrote: > Hi Jean, > > Sorry for the delay, I was out last week. Comments inline below. > > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 19:02:47 +0100 > Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe at linaro.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 04:01:02PM -0800, Jacob Pan (Jun) wrote: > > > > (1) ACPI has one table per

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Daniel Journo <dan at keshercommunications.com> wrote: > > Prior to a call entering a Queue, I set __DYNAMIC_FEATURES=NewRecordApp. > > AgentA answers and is able to use that feature code. > > If AgentA performs an attended transfer of a call from a queue to > AgentB, the > > feature code no longer works. > > > > It only

I just got 50 Mbps symmetric fiber from AT&T and it includes a /56 of IPv6 addresses, replacing a much slower ADSL line. I never tried to get IPv6 working on the old connection. I'm using CentOS 7 as a gateway and it's worked great for several versions for IPv4. I'm not seeing any IPv6 default route on the WAN interface. I suspect I'm not getting route announcements. I

Here is the scenario: I have one server with kernel 2.4.24 with a bridge br0 made of 2 interfaces, eth0 and tap0 (the last is an OpenVPN tunnel), and one remote computer connetting through tap0. If I assign a static IP to the remote computer, the bridge works perfecly (so I think the problem is not OpenVPN-related). If I start a DHCPd on the server and I configure the remote client to get the

Hi, I have a bridge firewall already working with 2 eth. I need to set up a another eth to do NAT like http://www.shorewall.net/images/bridge2.png The question is (using the same notation as the image), I need to put a 192.168.0.2.X in the eth1 and act as the bridged part (not use Nat). It is possible ? Thanks in advance. PS : I''m not subscribe to the list. Please reply to my

hi everyone I wonder why, when I attach an interface like this: virsh # attach-interface --domain win10Ent --type direct --source nm-team --config --persistent --model virtio host cannot ip ping the guest and vice versa, yet guest can ping other nodes(outside of its host, connected via phys net via a switch) Would you know? I thought maybe routing on the host, so I did: $ route add -host

Deep in the discussion of this bug, unfortunately mostly in private comments: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594515 we decided it'd be more flexible for RHV if we had a way to map individual NICs to target networks and bridges. This can be done by adding a new --mac option so you can specify the exact mapping you need: $ virt-v2v [...] \ --mac

Hi, I use now samba3.0.1pre1 with ldapsam (OpenLDAP 2.1.23). After I played with sambaGroupMapping I now get the error Message: "Die angegebene Gruppe ist nicht vorhanden" "The given group does not exist" when I log in (administrator). Admin's SID is: S-1-5-21-1091375802-1471697927-1951840895-500 Domain SID is: S-1-5-21-1091375802-1471697927-1951840895 The error occured

Hi, I have started the xen kernel with parameter dom0_mem=300M. xm info | grep total total_memory : 2045 Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 300 2 r----- 292.1 FTP 822 1 56.7 LDAP 1 822 1 r----- 541.3 NFS1 822 1 14.8 NFS2 822 1 1.4 For the

What is the maximum number of devices that can be enslaved in a bridge interface? I have tried enslaving 512 devices. Although the brctl tool did not complain while adding them, when I use brctl show command it only shows 255. Thanks

Hi all Assume that you have a linux bridge with two interfaces eth0 and eth1 enslaved to this bridge What is the difference between sniffing the bridge and sniffing its interfaces? tcpdump -i br0 vs tcpdump -i eth0 Thanks MiniME -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have a bridge br0, it enslaves two NICs: eth0 and eth1. By using "cat /proc/net/dev ", i can see the Rx/Tx packets and bytes through each interface. just like this: [* time tick 1 *] Inter-| Receive | Transmit face |bytes packets errs drop fifo frame compressed multicast|bytes packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed

find_by_sql BREAKS THE OOP BEAUTY and perhaps we can solve that. NAMING CONVENTIONS can perhaps make find_by_sql much more clever. lets imagine that relation: publishers <- books <-> authors_books <-> authors -> universities (can''t find something else than university for that last association :) ) imagine we want to fetch every book and every associated