similar to: [Bridge] 1 system with 3 bridges

Hi, I had successfully setup my bridge (br0) but after few minutes the br0 interface seems not working. ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 ifconfig eth5 0.0.0.0 brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 eth5 brctl stp br0 on I check on my system's /var/log/syslog file. It shows something strange messages as below: - Jan 2 10:44:22 fw01 kernel: ipt_tcpmss_target: bad length (64 bytes)

Hi, I met a problem when using bridge with netfilter. The kernel version 2.4.20, and the patch is bridge-nf-0.0.10-against-2.4.20.diff. Our firewall configuration is as follows, eth3,eth4,eth5,eth6 configured as a bridge with an IP address 10.0.0.1. The local net connect to the internet via the gateway 10.0.0.1 and SNAT is applied on the firewall. It worked but sometimes there are some

Hello everybody! Spse I have the following X <- seq(1:100) #(a dim(100) sequence of integers 1:100 representing the possible actions of player 1 and player2 in a game) BR2X<- br2(X) #(a dim(100) sequence of points on range (1,100) representing the best response function of player 2 to player 1:s actions) BR1X<- br1(X) #(a dim(100) sequence of points on range (1,100)

Hi, I have 8 ethernet cards installed. Is it possible to use eth0-eth6 as the net interface for shorewall and eth1 as the lan network? Thanks. sangprabv sangprabv@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi, I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. But when I do ifconfig eth1 I can see output as below. If I do ifconfig eth12 , I don't see anything which i am assume is normal. eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:E8:44:DB:CC BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0

A CentOS 6.3 box ("host") runs several KVM virtual machines, each of which has two interfaces attached to the two bridges br1 and br2 (and each thus has two IP's; one on 192.168.0.0/22 and one on 192.168.4.0/22); net.ipv4.ip_forward on the host is 1. Simplified diagram: host +---------------+ |

Running CentOS 5.4 x64. Have successfully bridged eth2 with br2 by following the instructions here: http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking (under the RHEL section) Have been running several KVM VMs successfully via this bridge. I am now trying to bridge additional interfaces by using the same routine. Each bridge is named to correspond with the ethX device its bridged with. Example of

--On Monday, March 21, 2016 08:57:59 AM -0700 Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/20/2016 08:51 PM, Devin Reade wrote: >> In a CentOS 7 test HA cluster I'm building I want both traditional >> services running on the cluster and VMs running on both nodes > > On a purely subjective note: I think that's a bad design. One of the >

Hello all, I am new to Linux Ethernet bridging. Let me first start with what I am trying to achieve. Well you see - I am attempting to have 2 main firewall running at the same time - one as a master and the other one as a slave. Yes, I would like to make use of Ethernet bridging in this scenario - as I understand it, all I need are two machines and STP enabled. I am running Debian

Hi All :) I have three servers, all with centos 7 installed 3 days ago. I need on them "old" naming scheme (ethX) for network interfaces, because of that: # grep GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX /etc/sysconfig/grub GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rd.lvm.lv=centos_node-XY/swap rd.lvm.lv=centos_node-XY/root rhgb quiet ipv6.disable=1 net.ifnames=0" net.ifnames=0 was added and afterwards I ran:

I'm looking for some information regarding the interaction of KVM, VLANs, firewalld, and the kernel's forwarding configuration. I would appreciate input especially from anyone already running a similar configuration in production. In short, I'm trying to figure out if a current configuration is inadvertently opening up traffic across network segments. On earlier versions of CentOS

I have just noticed this message in my kernel logs, reporting the possibility of an error with my memory. This would go a long way towards explaining the problems i''ve been having. This particular error is occuring when i''m not running xen so is obviously not something brought on by xen itself. The strange thing is that the NMI error is always followed by the TLAN: eth0: Adaptor

Hello, I''m new to Xen (and this mailing-list) and facing some problems with the network. I''m stuck and don''t know how to continue. And Google isn''t very helpful either... My setup: - Ubuntu 7.10 for dom0 and Debian 4.0 for all domU - 4 physical NIC (DHCP from my ISP, internal LAN, DMZ & WLAN) - 1 Dom as firewall/router - 1 domU with internal services

Hi, this is my Linux Box ---------------------------- LAN 1 -----|--eth1 <---br1--->eth0.1 | | \ | | eth0--|----- 802.1q tagged 1 Mbps link | / | LAN 2 -----|--eth2 <---br2--->eth0.2 | ---------------------------- I have to bridge the 2 lans

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:59:56 +0200 "Peter M" <peter.mdk@gmail.com> wrote: > The analyzer is a AMD Duron around 1200 MHz and has 128 MB of RAM. Your trying to squeeze blood from a turnip (not tulip) by trying to run 8 interfaces at once on that system. > I can't remember if the crashes only comes when I'm running tcpdumps > on several bridges at a time. But

Hi, I have a server and ten clients in a Gigabit network. The server has 125mbps network bandwidth. I want that the server has 40Mbps bandwidth reserved for client 1 (IP 192.168.5.141), and the rest bandwidth is for all other clients. My script looks like this (I use IFB for incoming traffic): #!/bin/bash export TC="/sbin/tc" $TC qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1: htb default 30

Hi, i am testing two bridges by sending to it random packets using hping2. First i create a random-length file, then i send it a lot of time on the wire using this command: for ($i=0; $i<50000; $i++) { hping2 -q -c 1 -d $data_len -E random.file 10.0.0.10 } My problem is that some packets are lost. Here is my setup: PC1 (10.0.0.1) ===== BR1 --------- BR2 ===== PC2 (10.0.0.10)

Hello, i have a server with 2 public ips on 2 devices. I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the incoming device Could i realize this with firewalld? Or directly iptables? Greeting J

Hello Laine: I've revised the configuration and followed all your instructions. I'll try to give you a better explain of my problem. a) I need a bridged (3) configuration, because I have to connect the guests from each others. (via ssh and execute mpi). I've three hosts, each of one has at least a guest. I'll only explain about the configuration of one of them, because the problem

Hi all, I have a bridging firewall running fine with kernel 2.4.31 (Slackware 10.1) and iptables 1.2.11 Yesterday I install the new kernel 2.6.14.3 and iptables 1.3.4 but the bridging firewall doesn't work anymore. Do I need to patch the kernel 2.6 as what I did it for kernel 2.4? Or what I have missed? Regards, ro0ot