Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "[Bridge] brctl uses incorrect sysfs path"
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] libbridge<->sysfs interface - some bugs
Hi,
I think I detected some bugs in libbridge 1.2. Probably none detected
them so far because of the fallback to ioctl() whenever anything fails.
On my system (user 32 bits, kernel 64 bits) the fallback doesn't work.
It would be nice BTW to have a compile time option that leaves the ioctl
fallback out...
Here's what I've found (first patch is a compilation patch I posted last
2009 Jun 15
0
[Bridge] [PATCH] bridge-utils: fix sysfs path for setting bridge configuration parameters
Under newer kernels the bridge configuration parameters
are located under /sys/class/net/$bridgename/bridge/$param,
while the current bridge-utils code is trying to access
them under /sys/class/net/$bridgename/$param. This patch
fixes this issue in the bridge-utils code and so allows
setting of bridge configuration parameters using sysfs
under newer kernel versions.
Signed-off-by: Anna Fischer
2009 Jun 15
0
[Bridge] [PATCH] bridge-utils: fix sysfs path for setting bridge configuration parameters
Under newer kernels the bridge configuration parameters
are located under /sys/class/net/$bridgename/bridge/$param,
while the current bridge-utils code is trying to access
them under /sys/class/net/$bridgename/$param. This patch
fixes this issue in the bridge-utils code and so allows
setting of bridge configuration parameters using sysfs
under newer kernel versions.
Signed-off-by: Anna Fischer
2009 Jun 15
0
[Bridge] [PATCH] bridge-utils: fix sysfs path for setting bridge configuration parameters
Under newer kernels the bridge configuration parameters
are located under /sys/class/net/$bridgename/bridge/$param,
while the current bridge-utils code is trying to access
them under /sys/class/net/$bridgename/$param. This patch
fixes this issue in the bridge-utils code and so allows
setting of bridge configuration parameters using sysfs
under newer kernel versions.
Signed-off-by: Anna Fischer
2009 Aug 13
0
[Bridge] [PATCH] bridge-utils: Add 'hairpin' port forwarding mode
This patch adds a 'hairpin' (also called 'reflective relay') mode
port configuration to the Linux Ethernet bridge utilities.
A bridge supporting hairpin forwarding mode can send frames back
out through the port the frame was received on.
Hairpin mode is required to support basic VEPA (Virtual
Ethernet Port Aggregator) capabilities.
You can find additional information on VEPA
2009 Aug 13
0
[Bridge] [PATCH] bridge-utils: Add 'hairpin' port forwarding mode
This patch adds a 'hairpin' (also called 'reflective relay') mode
port configuration to the Linux Ethernet bridge utilities.
A bridge supporting hairpin forwarding mode can send frames back
out through the port the frame was received on.
Hairpin mode is required to support basic VEPA (Virtual
Ethernet Port Aggregator) capabilities.
You can find additional information on VEPA
2009 Aug 13
0
[Bridge] [PATCH] bridge-utils: Add 'hairpin' port forwarding mode
This patch adds a 'hairpin' (also called 'reflective relay') mode
port configuration to the Linux Ethernet bridge utilities.
A bridge supporting hairpin forwarding mode can send frames back
out through the port the frame was received on.
Hairpin mode is required to support basic VEPA (Virtual
Ethernet Port Aggregator) capabilities.
You can find additional information on VEPA
2007 Apr 18
5
[Bridge] RFC: [PATCH] bridge vlan integration
Hi,
The attached patches enables the bridge to filter and forward packets
according to their IEEE 802.1q headers. The goals behind this change
include :
- Enable running STP on 802.1q tagged networks. STP packets
must be untagged. It isn't obvious how else to enable STP
with the current bridge and vlan code.
- Add native support for an untagged vlan. Currently an untagged
vlan can
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Building 1.1 ?
Good day Folks!
Working on a bridging firewall/gateway and attempting to solve the age-old
mystery of whether I can get NAT to work across a gateway that has 2 NICs and
requires a bridge...
Upside is, I have the gateway working, bridging works (as does OpenVPN using
that bridge). But NAT does not in Fedora Core 4...
>From dmesg: Linux version 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
So I went to the website and
2009 Jun 15
0
[Bridge] [PATCH][RFC] bridge-utils: add basic VEPA support
This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA)
capabilities to the Linux Ethernet bridging utilities.
The patch provides functionality that depends on the Linux kernel
patch 'net/bridge: add basic VEPA support'.
This patch relies on the patch 'bridge-utils: fix sysfs path for
setting bridge configuration parameters'.
A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is
2009 Jun 15
0
[Bridge] [PATCH][RFC] bridge-utils: add basic VEPA support
This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA)
capabilities to the Linux Ethernet bridging utilities.
The patch provides functionality that depends on the Linux kernel
patch 'net/bridge: add basic VEPA support'.
This patch relies on the patch 'bridge-utils: fix sysfs path for
setting bridge configuration parameters'.
A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is
2009 Jun 15
0
[Bridge] [PATCH][RFC] bridge-utils: add basic VEPA support
This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA)
capabilities to the Linux Ethernet bridging utilities.
The patch provides functionality that depends on the Linux kernel
patch 'net/bridge: add basic VEPA support'.
This patch relies on the patch 'bridge-utils: fix sysfs path for
setting bridge configuration parameters'.
A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] two fields are missing in brctl output when using /sys
I've noticed for a while that
# brctl showstp
output is showing 0 for port_no and port_id
It seems that somewhere in 2.6 sysfs land the following items got
printed in hexadecimal, and brctl code was parsing for decimal only
doug:/sys/class/net/eth0/brport# cat port_id
0x8001
doug:/sys/class/net/eth0/brport# cat port_no
0x1
The following patch to bridge-utils (git and 1.2 release) lets
2002 Sep 17
1
Problems compiling patched bridge-utils
Hello,
I''ve applied ``bridge-utils-0.9.5-ipmode-1.diff'''' to be able to use my
shaper as bridge and don''t lose the netfilter capabilities, the patch
applies with no error messages, which makes me supose everything is
working fine.
But when i try to recompile the bridge-utils utilities i get the
message transcript below:
2007 Apr 18
2
[Bridge] bridge_list orphans in linux-2.4
Hi all,
We use linux-2.4.20 in one of our products and we've found what looks
to be a problem in the bridge module. (I know this is old code but we
don't send our customers kernel upgrades unless we really have to!)
The problem is that some of our bridges have become orphaned from the
bridge module. Specifically
ifconfig ourbridgename
shows that the device "ourbridgename"
2007 Nov 22
1
[Bridge] Conflict between net/if.h and linux/if.h
Hi,
I use the libbridge and an other lib (libnl) in a same project.
I include the headers files of the two lib (libnl first and libbridgge
after) and I've a conflict with the inclusion of linux/if.h (in libnl
headers) and net/if.h (in libbridge.h), I've this error :
/usr/include/net/if.h:45: error: parse error before numeric constant
/usr/include/net/if.h:111: error: redefinition of
2005 Jan 06
0
skip unconnected interfaces
This patch makes it so that ipconfig only configures devices that are
connected:
--- klibc-0.194/ipconfig/main.c.orig 2005-01-06 15:20:24.749525888 -0700
+++ klibc-0.194/ipconfig/main.c 2005-01-06 15:24:48.038499880 -0700
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
static char do_not_config;
static unsigned int default_caps = CAP_DHCP | CAP_BOOTP | CAP_RARP;
static int loop_timeout = -1;
+static int only_connected = 0;
2015 Sep 10
1
[PATCH] launch: libvirt: Better error when bridge / virbr0 doesn't exist (RHBZ#1262127).
The current diagnostic is terrible. This one tells the user how to
diagnose and fix the problem.
---
src/launch-libvirt.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/launch-libvirt.c b/src/launch-libvirt.c
index 1c0bfac..d4c4c47 100644
--- a/src/launch-libvirt.c
+++ b/src/launch-libvirt.c
@@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ static int is_blk (const
2007 Apr 18
7
[Bridge] (no subject)
Dear Sir,
I was trying to install bridge as we are installing
scps gateway in our testbed.This requires us to
install the bridge.
Our Linux version is 2.4.18 ~3 and we are using redhat
7.2
Please let me know which is the bridge I should
install and how to configure it.
Before configuring the bridge what I should check in
my configuration.
Thanks for your time,
Sincerely
Rama
=====
I hear
2015 Mar 03
1
Re: QEMU interface type=ethernet
2015-03-02 23:41 GMT+03:00 Brian Rak <brak@gameservers.com>:
> In IRC, I was directed to this patch:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-February/msg01212.html ...
> which does exactly what I was looking for. It doesn't build cleanly in that
> state, but it's pretty trivial fix (needs actualType added to the function
> definition for