Hello, I''ve applied ``bridge-utils-0.9.5-ipmode-1.diff'''' to be able to use my shaper as bridge and don''t lose the netfilter capabilities, the patch applies with no error messages, which makes me supose everything is working fine. But when i try to recompile the bridge-utils utilities i get the message transcript below: esteban@inercia:~/devel/nexusbm/bridge-utils-0.9.5$ make make -C libbridge make[1]: Entering directory `/home/esteban/devel/bridge-shaper/bridge-utils-0.9.5/libbridge'' gcc -Wall -g -c libbridge_devif.c libbridge_devif.c: In function `br_set_bridge_ip_mode'': libbridge_devif.c:151: `BRCTL_SET_BRIDGE_IP_MODE'' undeclared (first use in this function) libbridge_devif.c:151: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once libbridge_devif.c:151: for each function it appears in.) make[1]: *** [libbridge_devif.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/esteban/devel/bridge-shaper/bridge-utils-0.9.5/libbridge'' make: *** [libbridge/libbridge.a] Error 2 If I compile the bridge-utils with no patch applied (or with the lower version diff applied) it compiles seamsly, and I can build a .deb with it too :-) Any Clue? -- Esteban A. Maringolo Buenos Aires, Argentina
Hello, On 17 Sep 2002, Esteban Maringolo wrote:> I''ve applied ``bridge-utils-0.9.5-ipmode-1.diff'''' to be able to use my > shaper as bridge and don''t lose the netfilter capabilities, the patch > applies with no error messages, which makes me supose everything is > working fine. > > But when i try to recompile the bridge-utils utilities i get the > message transcript below: > > esteban@inercia:~/devel/nexusbm/bridge-utils-0.9.5$ make > make -C libbridge > make[1]: Entering directory > `/home/esteban/devel/bridge-shaper/bridge-utils-0.9.5/libbridge'' > gcc -Wall -g -c libbridge_devif.c > libbridge_devif.c: In function `br_set_bridge_ip_mode'': > libbridge_devif.c:151: `BRCTL_SET_BRIDGE_IP_MODE'' undeclared (first use > in this function)May be you need 2.4.19 kernel in /usr/src/linux patched with bridge-ipmode-2.4.19-2.diff, the user-space stuff is not enough.> Any Clue?Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [Bridge] Building 1.1 ?
- [Bridge] brctl uses incorrect sysfs path
- [Bridge] two fields are missing in brctl output when using /sys
- [Bridge] [PATCH] bridge-utils: fix sysfs path for setting bridge configuration parameters
- [Bridge] [PATCH] bridge-utils: fix sysfs path for setting bridge configuration parameters