similar to: Xen not applying custom network script on startup

Hello, I''m new to Xen (and this mailing-list) and facing some problems with the network. I''m stuck and don''t know how to continue. And Google isn''t very helpful either... My setup: - Ubuntu 7.10 for dom0 and Debian 4.0 for all domU - 4 physical NIC (DHCP from my ISP, internal LAN, DMZ & WLAN) - 1 Dom as firewall/router - 1 domU with internal services

Hello all, I have been running xen for a while now with two interfaces: dummy0 for host only communication, and eth0 for the outside network. my script looks like this: (/etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge-more) ------------------------------------------------------------------ #! /bin/sh dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=dummy0

Hi Folks: I have a strange problem with multiple (2) NICs on a CentOS 5.5 dom0 setup running xen 3.4.3 and have been struggling to fix it for some time. I could not find anything by googling or searching through this list but that is probably because I couldn''t figure out the correct search terms. After I configure my bridges the command "system network restart" fails for eth1

Hello all, I have a Xen server with 6 network interfaces, I want a bridge on all of them. I use a personal network script like this : #!/bin/bash dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@"

Hello all, I''m using Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (with RH Virtualization) and a Dell Poweredge 2950 with 10 NICs. My virtual operating systems are all RHEL4, and I''ve installed 4 instances. I''m trying to set up the virtual operating systems so that the physical NICs are allocated to certain operating systems. Using the following tutorial:

Hello all, I have been running xen for a while now with two interfaces: dummy0 for host only communication, and eth0 for the outside network. my script looks like this: (/etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge-more) ------------------------------------------------------------------ #! /bin/sh dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=dummy0

Hi @all, I tried to setup xen 3.3 on centos 5 Update 2. I used the following packages: http://bderzhavets.blogspot.com/2008/08/install-xen-3.html The server has 4 physical network interfaces and i want to use them all. eth0 => only for host (configured with static ip) eth1 => first vm (configured with static ip) eth2 => second vm (configured with static ip) eth3 => all other vm

Hello Everyone, I have set up a xen server with 10 physical network devices using the bridge mode of XEN. This is because I want to split and separate the network traffic for security reasons. Maybe the best way is to use pci back hide. But I want to understand what is going on here. For all testings I have only activated eth[0-3]. My first tests were successful. I have created a VM using

Hi, In one of our xen server, I am using two bonding. bond0 : Is for trunk, where the vlans are attached , port eth0 & eth1 is attached to bond0 bond1 : eth2 & eth3 are attached to bond1, where physical ip has been set . In the /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp, I am using (network-script *multi-network-bridge*) , the

Hi, I am facing issues after upgrading one of the server from rhel5.5. (86_64) to latest rhel5.7 (86_64). The server is under trunk configuraion. I have set the network bridge as follows: #!/bin/bash vconfig set_name_type DEV_PLUS_VID_NO_PAD dir=$(dirname " $0" /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge $@ vifnum=1 bridge=xenbr2 netdev=bond0.10 /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge $@

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a linux system with 4 ethernet interfaces, eth0 goes to the internet, eth1, eth2, and eth3 are NAT''d LANs. I want to use an ingress filter to prioritize bandwidth (downstream from internet) to various IPs. I want to sett it up something like this.... eth0 <--[NAT]--> dummy0 <---> dummy1 <---> eth1,eth2,eth3 dummy1

hello ! i try to use a network technology on one single host, which wasn`t designed for that. to give a short overview of what i`m talking about: AoE is just like a "networked blockdevice" (just like nbd/enbd) - but without tcp/ip. AoE kernel driver is the "client end" (see this like an iSCSI initiator) - and an etherblade storage appliance is the "server end"

This is all on SuSE enterprise 10 Our server was moved to a new location last night. After powerup there was no sign of networking so our ISP reconfigured the box. Outbound connectivity had previously been through eth1 but is now through eth0 Since restarting Xen I now have no network connectivity through the hosts. I have tried to provide all the relevant details below. If anyone has a moment

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.0.0-1 Hello guys, Ik running Debian stable (squeeze). I run a virtual pfsense firwall in a DomU. I created multiple bridges. The interfaces itself (except eth2 (connected to br_lan)) itself don't have a IP assigned. I use them to connect to other devices. grep my-network /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp (network-script my-network-script) root at

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.0.0-1 Hello guys, Ik running Debian stable (squeeze). This appeared in the messages when i started and stopped a DomU: root at dom0:~# cat messages Aug 31 22:04:52 dom0 kernel: [ 775.569937] device vif6.0 entered promiscuous mode Aug 31 22:04:52 dom0 kernel: [ 775.575993] br_lan: port 2(vif6.0) entering forwarding state Aug 31 22:04:52 dom0 kernel: [

tl;dr - a renamed dummy interface is not persisting across reboots on Cent6. I have a situation where I need to rename a dummy interface on my system. I have a total of 3 dummy interfaces: dummy0 dummy1 adummy0 I've been doing some puppet testing in a vbox VM to get this all sorted out to deploy to a group of boxes. Every time I reboot my VM, it comes up WITHOUT adummy0, but I notice

I've encountered an odd error state that I haven't been able to resolve yet. I have a customer that, for what ever reason, wants to use active mode occasionally for FTP xfers. What they have noticed, is that after you switch to active, and issue a command (they do 'ls', I've done other things like 'put' and 'get', etc.), the connection hangs. If you wait a

Hello. Is it possible to create different routing policies for "virtual" (as opposed to a real NIC) interfaces? I mean: be able to set up different rules for each of the "dummy0", "dummy1" interfaces, and/or aliases to the "lo" interface like "lo:0", "lo:1", etc. [For example, I assigned a zone (called "priv") to a subnet

Hello, I am trying to setup the networking on a Xen Ubuntu (Hardy) host on my laptop. I have the basic networking working and guest is able to use the eth0/peth0 bridging mechanism to communicate to the world. Is it possible to setup a dummy interface and bridge in Xen 3.2, along the lines outlined in RedHat Virtualization manual:

I have a OpenSuse 10.3 with xen 3.1.0 running and it''s been running fine for a few months. This past weekend it suddenly started to act up and after some troubleshooting I can now say that it seems like the guests(domU) loose the outgoing network pipe, from the console I can see that the TX counter is stuck at the same value but it''s no errors. It behaves as if whatever I try to