similar to: Upgrading Samba AD without upgrading any DC

On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:05:59 +0000 Stephen Brandli via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > HI, > > Really appreciate you guys! > > Three questions: > > First, I am installing new DCs using Bookworm's stable install. That would get you Samba 4.17.12, but using bookworm-backports will get you 4.21.3 ( the latest version ). > The > current DCs are

Roland, Thank you for your answers. To be clear, everything will be Bookworm when I'm done. My question about upgrading a new DC rather than upgrading old ones is the "Upgrade a DC and join it to the domain again" process here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC, right? You said it "raises the RID pools." I don't know what that means. But,

Op 18-10-2023 om 11:32 schreef Ingo Asche via samba: > Hi Michael, > > thanks for the info - and your work... > > As Bookworm for Raspberry isn't that far away, I can live with that. > This is "just" my playground... I have recently migrated my Raspberry Pi machines from Raspbian to Debian bookworm. It has several advantages: - All Debian packages are

Hi Michael, thanks for the info - and your work... As Bookworm for Raspberry isn't that far away, I can live with that. This is "just" my playground... Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Michael Tokarev via samba schrieb am 18.10.2023 um 09:17: > 16.10.2023 15:50, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> short question: will the

16.10.2023 15:50, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi Michael, > > short question: will the Bullseye-Backports getting 4.17.12, too? > > I saw, Bookworm is already updated... Since oldstable-bpo archive in debian is always subject to manual backports-policy processing (all uploads are processed manually), I don't push stuff to oldstable-bpo often. On the other hand, this

On 30-04-2023 10:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will >>> be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released,

On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be >> the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. >> Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba

Replying here as well, since this is a frequent question. I uploaded the updated samba packages to the official debian archives in parallel with updating my repository - exactly the same source packages as are used to build samba for my repository. 4.18 should already be available on sid/unstable, I think. In trixie/testing it will migrate within 5 days if nothing other breaks. Updated bookworm

On Mon, 2023-05-22 at 15:54:51 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > gene heskett <gheskett at shentel.net> writes: > > > > Which file in the nut I pulled a month ago, should I start with to get > > > > the new version actually running? I still get - -V=2.7.4 > > > On 5/22/23 07:13, Greg Troxel wrote: > > > It is likely that you have

I need to upgrade from Debian bullseye to Debian Bookworm. I also need to bring samba up from 4.17.12 to I guess the 4.20 series. Typically I haven't had problems in doing upgrades and I haven't spotted anything in the release notes I'm currently using the samba backports. My understanding is to remove backports from the sources list before upgrading to bookworm and then adding it

Are updating a DC or a member ? On 26 Aug 2024 at 14:45 +0100, Marco Shmerykowsky PE via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>, wrote: > I need to upgrade from Debian bullseye to > Debian Bookworm. I also need to bring samba > up from 4.17.12 to I guess the 4.20 series. > > Typically I haven't had problems in doing upgrades > and I haven't spotted anything in the release

Am 04.07.2024 um 21:00 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 20:27:37 +0200 > Paul Leiber via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Dear Samba list, >> >> I have a Samba instance running as an ad-dc on debian bullseye. > > I suggest you upgrade, bullseye goes EOL in three weeks. Aww, my system is already on bookworm, not on bullseye.

Hi Peter, Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: > Hi folks, > > I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be > the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. > Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba backports > for Bookworm? > > I saw a post from Michael Tokarev in this list a

On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 20:27:37 +0200 Paul Leiber via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Dear Samba list, > > I have a Samba instance running as an ad-dc on debian bullseye. I suggest you upgrade, bullseye goes EOL in three weeks. > Some > time ago, I changed the standard installation to backports with > > apt -t bullseye-backports install samba I normally

Hi folks, I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba backports for Bookworm? I saw a post from Michael Tokarev in this list a while ago, that there probably wont be a Samba 4.18 for Debian Bullseye. I also saw another post about

Thanks for the reply. I agree it's reasonable to expect me to update to see if that fixes the problem. I have started that very long process. I would not have bothered you all except, in the meantime, we have a real problem with the laptops. Also, since the fixed machines do not have the problem, I can see only two reasons for it: (1) The laptops are relying on broadcast, which isn't

Hi Michael, short question: will the Bullseye-Backports getting 4.17.12, too? I saw, Bookworm is already updated... -- Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama

On 2023-05-20 1:43 a.m., Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On 20/05/2023 04:44, Steven Monai via samba wrote: >> I found an open bug in bugzilla that reports a very similar assertion >> failure: "Bug 14030 - named crashes on DLZ zone update" >> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14030). Any chance this >> Bug is related to what I'm seeing? >

30.04.2023 11:20, Rowland Penny via samba ?????: .. > There is a big problem with this, bookworm hasn't been released yet and as far as I can see, there isn't a bookworm-backports yet. > The only mention of Samba 4.18 that I can see in Debian is in experimental, a long way from any backports. No, there's no long way to bookworm-backports. I use experimental just because debian

It was systemd-resolved. I disabled that. Now samba is binding to the port. But I'm still getting the dnsupdate failure. And, I can't ping anything. I get the "unknown host or service" error. So names are not getting resolved on the machine. I have to admit to complete ignorance about how this part of linux works. When running systemd-networkd, what normally does name