Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "rc15 in FC6"
2007 Jan 11
1
rc17 Linux RPM distribution rebuild trouble.
The question is addressed to Linux RPM-packagers.
Hello!
I was trying to rebuild rc17 binaries from
dovecot-1.0-1_38.rc17.at.src.rpm
taken at ATrpms <http://ATrpms.net/>. The process fails with following
messages:
--------------------
Making install in imap-quota
make[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/src/asplinux/BUILD/dovecot-1.0.rc15/src/plugins/imap-quota'
make[4]: Entering
2007 Jun 18
4
Madwifi just seems to work in Centos 5
I have not installed the madwifi specific kernel stuff (kdml and
hal-kdml) from atrpms. I have installed with wpa rpms.
And my Atheros card is working with almost no work on my part (other
than runing wpa_supplicant as a deamon).
Nice!
2010 May 30
2
beta5 builds under RHEL
Hi,
beta4 built under RHEL4, RHEL5 and RHEL6 (the latter being the public
beta). beta5 now builds only for RHEL5, the other two fail with:
strnum.c: In function `str_to_llong':
strnum.c:139: error: `LLONG_MIN' undeclared (first use in this function)
strnum.c:139: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
strnum.c:139: error: for each function it appears in.)
Thanks!
--
2008 Mar 31
4
atrpms nvidia cannot load
Hi guys - brand new 5.1 install here and quite happy - but...
The nv driver did not work at all for me, fritzy stripes and dots. This is a
GeForce 7300 LE which was working happily dual-head under FC6 with the livna
nvidia RPMs
So I looked around and it seemed like the ATRpms repo via yum was the best
option for CentOS. This is what I installed, it worked great with the
xorg.conf from the
2007 Jun 14
6
Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0, Centos 5, and rpms
I am making some progress on my Centos 5 notebook build.
So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0.
Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing
improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I have not even had a chance to
look at Thunderbird 2.0, that is new)?
I have the install steps we covered here back on 2/2/07; but are there
rpms? I did not find anything over at
2006 Dec 14
4
Zaptel under FC6
Hi, all
I am building a new server. Have installed FC 6 and put in TDM400 card.
Checked out latest asteriusk code, run make install in zaptel directory.
So far all is fine.
Now I am trying to install the drivers.
# modprobe zaptel
FATAL: Module zaptel not found.
Fair enough, no zaptel driver is found on the system.
Is there are any known problems with FC6? I did not have much trouble
running
2007 Jun 14
3
Trying to understand Suspend 2
I am trying to understand Suspend 2 and what I have to do to get it
working in Centos 5. There is quite a bit for it at ATrpms:
http://www.atrpms.net/dist/el5/hibernate-suspend2/
http://www.atrpms.net/dist/el5/kernel-suspend2/
The later is the kernel patches that they refer to at the Suspend2
website, so I don't have to recompile the kernel?
I noticed that over at:
2007 Jul 23
3
Can we get a newer version of madwifi on rpmforge?
RPMforge still has:
rpmForge:
madwifi-0.9.2.1-2.el5.rf.i386.rpm
ATrpms has:
madwifi-0.9.4-38_r2512.fc6.i386.rpm but requires their patched kernel.
I am at IETF this week, and was at IEEE 802 last week.
There are over 60 visible access points in most locations (actually not
that may APs, but an SSID for b/g, another for a, another for 802.1x
TKIP, another for 802.1x CCMP, argh!) and I
2007 Jun 18
3
Centos 5 - Setting up yum for ATrpms
I think I found one of my setup problems. I followed instructions at: http://atrpms.net/install.html
And now I see that the information shown there to put into yum.conf (that I put into yum.repo.d/atrpms.repo) is only for FC, not for RL5 (thus Centos 5).
What do I use in my atrmps.repo to get it to access the RL5 directories?
2010 Jul 27
1
dovecot lda & sieve: resubmit folder for resieving
Hi,
I'm currently restructuring my mail archives and migrated from a decade
and a half old procmail supported solution to sieve.
While doing so I often found that I'd like to filter a bunch of messages
(with "bunch" in the area of 1-10K) with my shiny new sieve script. I
found in the wiki a way to do that:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/RefilterMail
And it works well, it picks
2014 Apr 24
1
2.2.12 RPM Needed
Greetings,
I'm not very experienced in building Source RPMs and we're in need of a
Dovecot RPM for version 2.2.12 for CentOS 5. It seems that the ATRPMs
repo maintained by Axel Thimm hasn't seen much activity lately and the
task of updating a source RPM is more than I have time for as a busy
developer who does systems admin on the side.
Could anybody recommend another repo
2007 Mar 22
3
--with-vpopmail compile errors
Hi,
I'm building dovecot.src.rpm with vpopmail support and I get this error:
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib
-I../../src/lib-sql -I../../src/lib-settings -I../../src/lib-ntlm
-DAUTH_MODULE_DIR=\""/usr/lib/dovecot/auth"\"
-DPKG_LIBEXECDIR=\""/usr/libexec/dovecot"\" -I/home/vpopmail/include
-std=gnu99 -O2 -g -march=i686 -Wall
2007 Jun 18
1
Do I really have the right ATrpms repo?
I copied exactly where Axel provided into atrmps.repo. I have the line:
atrpms.repo:baseurl=http://dl.atrpms.net/el5-x86_64/atrpms/stable
but the rpms that are being flagged as updates pretty much all have fc5
in their names.
e.g.:
---> Package mplayer-fonts.noarch 4:1.0-7.at set to be updated
---> Package mplayer.i386 4:1.0-60_r23482.fc5 set to be updated
---> Package
2007 Apr 20
3
dovecot.spec
Hi List,
Plis, where can i find an updated version (for recently dovecot v1.0.0) of
dovecot.spec, needed to build an rpm for RH 4?
Thanks in advance,
Juan Carlos
2008 May 07
3
Yum + priorities plugin question
Hello all!
I've recently started using the priorities plugin as part of my best
practices. It's very effective, and prevents nasty things from
happening (like atrpms upgrading python and disabling yum.)
I'm wondering if there's a simple and elegant way to allow
package-name-based exclusions. For example: For my mysql cluster, I'd
prefer to have the latest mysql and
2010 Apr 07
3
pigeonhole: naming and versioning
Hi Stephan,
many thanks for all the work you do on the new sieve parts to dovecot.
As a (downstream) packager I have some questions:
a) pigeonhole is called a working title - will the final release
be called something else like dovecot-sieve again?
b) The versioning seems to go from 0.1.15 to 0.1.13. From a packager's
POV it would be better to allow a natural version upgrade
path.
2007 Feb 20
6
FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64
I tried to test Asterisk 1.4 on FC6 x86_64. I have it working on FC5 x86_64
very good, but since FC keeps updating, I tried to follow newer kernel
versions.
I can't pass the zaptel compilation. Everything is OK, but when I finished,
and tried to load it, allways got module not found when I run modprobe
zaptel, and modprobe ztdummy.
I already tried to modify is with the sed 1 option but
2008 Aug 06
4
Experience moving mailboxes from Dovecot 0.99.14 to Dovecot 1.07 => Improvement possible
Hi,
This small mail to share my observation about a recent move of mailboxes
between two servers and ask about explanation and/or improvement about UIDL
in dovecot.
SV1 : Dovecot 0.99.14 / Red Hat Fedore Core 4
SV2 : Dovecot 1.07 / CentOS 5.2
Mailboxes in /var/spool/mail on the twoo servers.
Test will be done with outlook express with option "leave message on server"
checked.
Goal is
2006 Aug 13
6
dovecot tring to load sql modules
Dovecot is issuing:
Aug 12 17:09:27 athlon1 dovecot: Dovecot v1.0.rc6 starting up
Aug 12 17:09:27 athlon1 dovecot: Generating Diffie-Hellman parameters
for the first time. This may take a while..
Aug 12 17:09:28 athlon1 dovecot: Auth process died too early - shutting down
Aug 12 17:09:28 athlon1 dovecot: auth(default): dovecot-auth: error
while loading shared libraries: libmysqlclient.so.10:
2007 Mar 02
3
Upgrade dovecot - rpm or spec
His Friends,
I've been using dovecot-1.0.alpha5 for a long time, now i would like to
update to v.1.0.rc24 on my Red Hat ES 4 machine, so i need an rpm version
that i couldn't find on the web. Also now i can build the rpm package via
SPECS, which i don't have. Plis, anybody would help?
Thanks in advanced,
Alfredo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was