similar to: Postfix + Doveot SASL

Package: logcheck-database Followup-For: Bug #407642 I've found another litle error in dovecot POP3 rules. The line ^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dovecot: POP3\([-_.@[:alnum:]]+\): Disconnected: Logged out top=[[:digit:]]+/[[:digit:]]+, retr=[[:digit:]]+/[[:digit:]]+, del=[[:digit:]]+/[[:digit:]]+, size=[[:digit:]]+$ must be similar to the following IMAP one (on my system

I''m testing how xen and grub2 can work together. I''m using xen 3.4.2 and grub2 1.97+20091115-1 from debian sid. After many failed attempts I''ve discovered that on my system the first argument that grub2 should pass to the linux kernel is lost. This is my working grub2 configuration: menuentry "Xen 3.4.0 / Debian GNU/Linux, Linux 2.6.31-1-xen-amd64" {

I''m testing how xen and grub2 can work together. I''m using xen 3.4.2 and grub2 1.97+20091115-1 from debian sid. After many failed attempts I''ve discovered that on my system the first argument that grub2 should pass to the linux kernel is lost. This is my working grub2 configuration: menuentry "Xen 3.4.0 / Debian GNU/Linux, Linux 2.6.31-1-xen-amd64" {

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.53 Severity: minor On my mailserver i've got some message like the following (user infos obscured): Jan 21 08:01:01 lorien postfix/smtp[3005]: 39D2315533A: to=<someuser at somedomain.org>, relay=mail.somedomain.org[11.22.33.44]:25, conn_use=2, delay=1.3, delays=0.06/0/0.44/0.83, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Message queued) This is a normal

I've made two little patches to allow dovecot to be compiled on GNU/Hurd. Could you review them? Kind regards, Marco Nenciarini -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- | Marco Nenciarini | Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member | | mnencia at prato.linux.it | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia |

As reported in debian bug #554306 [1] dovecot fails to build with GNU binutils-gold or setting LDFLAGS=-Wl,--no-add-needed http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554306 The problem is that liblber isn't explicitly declared as a dependence when dovecot is compiled with ldap support. The attached patch fixes this little error. Regards, Marco --

This is the trace (gdb) run Starting program: /root/tmp/dovecot-1.0.rc7/src/imap/imap x select inbox Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. mail_index_write_base_header (index=0x80e2a28, hdr=0xaff66028) at mail-index.c:1313 1313 memcpy(index->map->mmap_base, hdr, hdr_size); (gdb) bt #0 mail_index_write_base_header (index=0x80e2a28, hdr=0xaff66028) at

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.53 Severity: normal Tags: patch Accordingly with dovecot source src/login-common/client-common.c arround line 52 dovecot reports local connections with word "secured" at the same place where it insert the word TLS for encrypted connections. On my dovecot + squirrelmail system all connections are originating from local ip, so all message are

package dovecot-common forward 570764 dovecot at dovecot.org thanks Martin Schwenke ha scritto: > Package: dovecot-common > Version: 1:1.2.10-1 > Severity: normal > > > I attempt to compile the following sieve script... > > martins at bilbo:~/tmp$ cat test.sieve > if address :is "Return-path" "owner-cipe-l at inka.de" { > keep; > } >

Hello! In an attempt to finally get a recent Xen dom0 kernel booted on this pesky amd64 system (see <http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2009-10/msg00485.html> for the (short) story), I wanted to give this one one a try: Marco Nenciarini <mnencia at prato.linux.it> wrote: > I've applied latest forward ported patches from > >

I have been running Dovecot 1.2.5 since Sept 14. Beginning at about 03:28 on Sept 21 for no apparent (to me) reason and continuing through the present, I am seeing log messages like the following and am experiencing delays logging in. Sep 22 19:07:15 sbh16 dovecot: dovecot: Temporary failure in creating login processes, slowing down for now Sep 22 19:07:15 sbh16 dovecot: pop3-login: Fatal:

Hi, this is sort of off topic but I'm using dovecot with postfix on centos 5 and I have multiple virtual domains and I want to be able to have virtual admin's add/remove mappings/users for their own domains. I have looked around and haven't found many solutions just wondering what everyone is using for virtual mail management. TIA, Paul

'afternoon list! I use mysql as userdb, which contains two type of password schemes: DES and MD5-CRYPT. I read there : http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/PasswordSchemes that both are supported by dovecot. Unfortunately, dovecot keeps saying: Not a valid MD5-CRYPT or PLAIN-MD5 password when looking for a user with DES encrypted password. Is dovecot able to recognize password

Hi all, Speaking of Debian, what relative position are the Debian Unstable (Sid) packages in to the latest "Bleeding edge" builds of RCS-based releases from the Wiki? If using Unstable is it recommended to stay or use the newer ones? I'd say it was production, yes, but I'm forgiving of problems in the latest releases, so long as they aren't meant to be beta (i.e., known

package: logcheck-database version: 1.2.23 severity: wishlist The current regexp's for postfix/lmtp.. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/lmtp\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9A-F]: to=<[^[:space:]]+>, orig_to=<[^[:space:]]+>, relay=[^[:space:]]+\], delay=[0-9]+ status=sent \(250 2\.1\.5 Ok\)$ ..doesn't catch these messages: Jul 15 17:15:16 lorien postfix/lmtp[17151]: C1170480008B:

Hello, Last dovecot available version on Ubuntu 11.10 AMD64 is dovecot 2.0.13. dovecot-antispam package is compiled for dovecot 2.0.15. So, i'm trying to compile a new dovecot antispam plugin. I followed dovecot wiki but i'm running into this error : Successfully compiled dspam.c (plugin). mailbox.c: In function 'antispam_save_begin': mailbox.c:138:12: error: 'struct

Hi, I am running dovecot 1.0.rc7 on a Suse Linux server. The server has approx 200+ mailboxes. Last week the filesystem (/dev/mapper/datavg/dat2lv) ran out of space - causing it to do into read-only mode. When I realised this I allocated some more space and re-booted the machine... Strangely it seems that dovecot is still having problems... It's like dovecot doesn't realise that

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.4.2-3 Severity: minor Hi, I've just noticed that the xen-utils-common package instals the file xen-backend.rules both under /etc/udev/xen-backend.rules and /lib/udev/rules.d/xen-backend.rules I think the flormer is useless and is installed there by mistake. Kind Regards, Marco -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable

Hi guys, I'm experiencing seemingly random problems using roaming profiles with Samba 3.0.2 on Debian Woody and clients being Win XP Pro and Win2K (all of them running the latest service packs and critical updates and so forth). Sometimes when one of the machines tires to login the server profile can't be found. The error Windows comes up with is "Network name cannot be found."

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.41 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, here is one line for the imp4 package and one (I don't have more) line from the log file. Same as with the horde3 file: I've tested it and CC this mail to the maintainer. by, Martin - -- Powered by Debian GNU / Linux -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG