Hi all, Speaking of Debian, what relative position are the Debian Unstable (Sid) packages in to the latest "Bleeding edge" builds of RCS-based releases from the Wiki? If using Unstable is it recommended to stay or use the newer ones? I'd say it was production, yes, but I'm forgiving of problems in the latest releases, so long as they aren't meant to be beta (i.e., known breakages). Cheers, Sabahattin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2655 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20100322/4bddb088/attachment-0002.bin>
Sabahattin Gucukoglu ha scritto:> Hi all, > > Speaking of Debian, what relative position are the Debian Unstable > (Sid) packages in to the latest "Bleeding edge" builds of RCS-based > releases from the Wiki? If using Unstable is it recommended to stay > or use the newer ones? I'd say it was production, yes, but I'm > forgiving of problems in the latest releases, so long as they aren't > meant to be beta (i.e., known breakages). >In the next few days a preliminary 2.0 package will be uploaded to experimental. We (the Debian Dovecot Maintainers) plan to avoid uploading the 2.0 package to unstable until it is released stable and has at least one bug-fix release. Kind regards, Marco -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- | Marco Nenciarini | Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member | | mnencia at prato.linux.it | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia | --------------------------------------------------------------------- Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95 5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 261 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20100323/bfae300e/attachment-0002.bin>