similar to: NTLM oddities

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "NTLM oddities"

2006 Dec 17
1
Proxy with MasterUser + Authentication issues
Per Timo's direction, I decided to give the MasterUser a try in connecting my proxy to my destination server. This might allow for the use of 'secure password' for my clients that like to check that box by default. A couple of problems I'm running into running RC15: #1: My Proxy's SQL password_query line: password_query = SELECT a.clearpasswd AS password, v.storeIP AS host,
2009 Jan 18
1
codepage/UnicodeData: tcase() data
Three questions: - Where did the file come from? - Does tcase() stand for toggle case (or otherwise effectively the same thing)? - Should uppercase characters like, the latin capital A, have tcase() data in addition to the lcase() data? -Gene "No one ever says, 'I can't read that ASCII E-mail you sent me.'"
2007 Jan 02
1
"Not connected to database" MySQL errors
I've been in the process of moving my pop3 proxy over to the dovecot proxy. I have a ton of users using pop3 still, and am seeing these errors popup within a minute or so of the connection to the database: Password query failed: Not connected to database Eventually the auth-worker will reconnect to the database and things will go on normal for another minute or two, then the same issue
2019 Nov 04
2
RFC: Updating to CMake 3.15.0
Hi Neil, I'm really not sure what you're getting at. Are you objecting to the proposal to update? The LLVM community operates by having request-for-comment (RFC) discussion threads to coalesce around a plan, then just moving forward. There is no formal argument or proposal needed. We also don't really have an official policy regarding updating CMake. In your other emails on the
2019 Oct 24
2
Replicate Individual O3 optimizations
I run matrix multiplication code with both the approaches o3 at clang and o3 at opt. clang o3 is about 2.97x faster than opt o3. On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:24 AM Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest.com> wrote: > is_sorted.cpp > bool is_sorted(int *a, int n) { > > for (int i = 0; i < n - 1; i++) > > if (a[i] > a[i + 1]) > return false; > return
2019 Jul 07
2
Linker errors after installing/compiling LLVM/CLANG
I understand that a difference between ninja and xcode is they use a different way to determine code dependencies. So to my understanding xcode needs dependencies to be properly created whereas ninja just doesn’t care. Maybe this is why ninja is able to find what it needs for the compilation to succeed, but not xcode. So I have now looked at the CMakeLists.txt files and found that all the missing
2006 Feb 20
2
.08Fast .8Furious (syncPEOPLE TM Bundle update)
syncPEOPLE (of which myself and Duane Johnson make up a part) would like to brag about the newest TM bundle, now with .DMG and patent pending (or not) QuickDrag installer technology. NEW FEATURE: command-option-p (without selection): Inline Partial Edit Mode When inside a view file that contains one or more ?render :partial? statements, hit ?command-option-p? without any selection and your
2019 Jul 07
2
Linker errors after installing/compiling LLVM/CLANG
Hey Joan, Take a look at this patch, and see if it resolves your issue: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64300 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64300> Thanks, -Chris > On Jul 7, 2019, at 3:54 PM, Chris Bieneman via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hey Joan, > > I looked into the Xcode build issue that you're experiencing, and it relates to a limitation in
1997 Mar 02
1
imapd and ipop3d hole
###### ## ## ###### ## ### ## ## ###### ## # ## ## ## ## ### ## ###### . ## ## . ######. Secure Networks Inc. Security Advisory March 2, 1997
2020 Apr 07
3
Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version
I think it does make a difference how many things we ask new developers to do to get up and running - because we've asked them to do one thing doesn't mean it's low-cost to ask them to do another thing. On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 11:20 AM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:16 AM Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at
2019 Jul 07
2
Linker errors after installing/compiling LLVM/CLANG
I don’t personally develop on Mac (i use Windows), but I have an analogous setup there where i use ninja to build and Visual Studio for editing, debugging, etc. What i do, and I assume it will be the same or very similar for Xcode, is to run cmake twice, once with Ninja, and once with VS (Xcode for you), from separate directories. I build with the ninja one (“ninja clang” on command line), and I
2020 Apr 07
2
Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version
> You're saying "doesn’t mean that we should" while I've been saying in this situation that "we can", there is quite a difference here I believe. Technically “we can” do anything we want. We can always require that the project be built with the current release candidate of CMake. That doesn’t mean that we should. From: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com>
2016 May 03
9
[Bug 95251] New: vdpau decoder capabilities: not supported
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95251 Bug ID: 95251 Summary: vdpau decoder capabilities: not supported Product: Mesa Version: 11.2 Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at
2019 Jul 07
3
Linker errors after installing/compiling LLVM/CLANG
I’m not saying you can’t use Xcode, I’m just saying that instead of *building* in Xcode, just type “ninja” on the command line to do your build and then use Xcode as you normally would. I don’t think it’s the case that LLVM does not intend to support Xcode, just that its a community driven project, so unless someone is sufficiently motivated to fix whatever this problem is, it might stay this way
2020 Apr 08
3
Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version
> On Apr 7, 2020, at 22:16, Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 11:27 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote: > I think it does make a difference how many things we ask new developers to do to get up and running - because we've asked them to do one thing
2019 May 19
0
Plugins/Mailcrypt: mail_crypt_private_password not assigned by password_query
I try to use Mailcrypt encrypted user keys with conjustion with dbsync replication(Dovecot 2.3.6 in FreeBSD 12.0 enviroment) but was unsuccessful. If I provide a password in mail_crypt_private_password variable directly in Dovecot config all things works as expected plugin { mail_crypt_curve = prime256v1 mail_crypt_save_version = 2 mail_crypt_require_encrypted_user_key = yes
2019 Jul 07
2
Linker errors after installing/compiling LLVM/CLANG
Try using ninja generator, most people do not use Xcode for building, so since it lesser-used, it also lesser tested. Note that it’s perfectly possible to use Xcode for code browsing, debugging, editing while using ninja for building, which is what I think most people do On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 4:20 AM Joan Lluch via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I also filled a bug
2020 Apr 06
5
Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version
Every additional dependency that we force the user to manually install (either by building from source, or adding some new PPA to their ubuntu system), raises the barrier to entry that much higher. Just because we may require the user to manually install some newer compiler on their system doesn’t mean that we should also require them to install some newer CMake than what’s on their system.
2013 Jul 03
2
LMTP Proxy
Trying to figure out Proxying with LMTP to a few back end storage servers for quota checking before accepting email delivery on the front end nodes. If I connect to the back end server directly via telnet, everything works great. If I use a front-end server to proxy to the back end server, I don't get the same result. Running 2.2.4 on both front and back end servers. Any help would be
2019 Oct 19
3
Replicate Individual O3 optimizations
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:22 AM David Greene via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > hameeza ahmed via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > > Hello, > > I want to study the individual O3 optimizations. For this I am using > > following commands, but unable to replicate O3 behavior. > > > > 1.