similar to: Auth mechanism variable expansion?

Hello all, I'm trying to understand when exactly the variable substitution happens in Dovecot, as I get different results in the LDA and in the POP/IMAP server. Here's my general setup: - Postfix MTA, delivers mail via Dovecot LDA - users list sits in a database - mail directory is stored in the database, but with Dovecot variables inside Delivery works perfectly fine,

I have recently begun playing with Dovecot (1.0.beta8) and have run into an interesting scenario. The way my email system is set up is that users of different domains have completely different base dn's. For instance, if a user is part of test.com the bind dn would be uid=user,ou=People,dc=test,dc=com. The bind dn for user at domain.com would be uid=user,ou=People,dc=domain,dc=com. I

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi List, with samba 2.2.3a-12 (debian stable release) I had the problem that following was not possible, because the variable %u was not expanded at the right time: In the following example I would like to have a directory structure with /home/samba/<username>/(profile|samba), this would make it possible to create this dir via /etc/skel and

Hi, the section "Global Parameters" of the current http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsyncd.conf.html says: "You may use references to environment variables in the values of parameters. String parameters will have %VAR% references expanded as late as possible (when the string is used in the program), allowing for the use of variables that rsync sets at connection time, such as

Hi all, We currently have code in InstCombine that tries to expand memcpy / memmove intrinsics that are copying something that fits in a single register to a load and store in the IR. We then have other code in SelectionDAG that expands small memcpy intrinsics to sequences of loads and stores. The InstCombine one is useful, as it exposes more optimisation opportunities, but unfortunately it is

Hi, Trying to solve the problem of supporting multiple auth mechanisms + proxy and really don't want to store user passwords in plain test and fine to do master user to backend. I had the crazy thought I could do something like the following: For each user Store supported password schemes as LDAP attributes: userPasswordCRAM-MD5: {CRAM-MD5}xxx userPasswordDIGEST-MD5: {DIGEST-MD5}xxxx

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 11/17/2015 6:51 PM, Rail Shafigulin via llvm-dev wrote: > >> I'm using a Hexagon's packetizer as an example to packetize instructions >> for my custom VLIW. The problem that I'm facing is that my target as it >> turns out doesn't have all the

Hi Karsten, > You should be able to add multiple userPassword attributes to your directory: > > userPassword: {CRAM-MD5}xxx > userPassword: {DIGEST-MD5}xxxx > userPassword: {SCRAM-SHA-1}xxxx > userPassword: {NTLM}xxxx > > > Karsten Did try this, didn't end end well. Jun 14 12:59:43 auth: Error: ldap(leonkyneur at itest.com,192.168.99.3,<SQn6QD41TpvLhgGR>):

Hello list A user reports failure to log in after password change. The client side error message indicates a lost or dropped connection by the server. A peek into the server logs reveales this: dovecot: imap(user at example.com)<53267><el0HoZGqHIdb0K2G>: Error: Failed to expand plugin setting plain_pass = 'asdf%?asdf': Unknown variable '%?' This looks a lot like a

Proposal: There should be a way to specify that some substitutions should be made in a way that is safe as far as Bourne Shell command lines are concerned (e.g., if %f expands to a string with special characters in it, it should be expanded to a sutiably quoted string in 'print command' parameters). Either all parameters that eventually result in a /bin/sh command line

I'm using a Hexagon's packetizer as an example to packetize instructions for my custom VLIW. The problem that I'm facing is that my target as it turns out doesn't have all the instructions expanded by the time packetization happens (for example I have a RET instruction which gets expanded into a write to a register and a jump/branch). I'm wondering if Hexagon is experiencing

Currently on PowerPC, calls to memcmp are not expanded and are left as library calls. In certain conditions, expansion can improve performance rather than calling the library function as done for functions like memcpy, memmove, etc. This patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/D28163) is an initial implementation for PowerPC to expand memcmp when the size is an 8 byte multiple. The approach currently

Hello, I expanded a KVM image of 4gb to 10 gb .... My Host machine is RHEL 6.1 and Guest is RHEL 5.5 Command i used is: virt-resize --expand /dev/sda1 RHEL5.5-64bit.img RHEL5.5-10gb Commands successfully gets executed... Old disk works fine i mean it boots properly but the new disk stucks at GRUB... Has any one seen this behavior... What should i do to debug this problem.. --

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Wei Mi via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> To: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin.org> >> Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "David Li" <davidxl at google.com> >> Sent:

On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 09:16:32AM -0600, Andy Bakun wrote: > Sorry that this is an older message, but I had a few questions. NP. > Nicolas Williams wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 07:36:52AM +1100, Andy Bakun wrote: > > > Every day samba gets closer to having more complete NT acl and group > > > support, and it would be nice to be able to do things on the

Is it possible to write a support function to automatize selective argument expansion (based on argument value type) as in the following example, in order to write terse code even when there are many arguments? Forcing evaluation of all arguments is not a problem ... ______________________________________________Thanks a lot!__________R_ # When called with document = 1, we have the

Hello. I'm trying to install this expansion under wine. The uninstaller reverted Dawn Of War to 1.40 correctly as it should, but due to an msi installer error, the expansion didn't install: fixme:advapi:LookupAccountNameW (null) L"fab" (nil) 0x34f808 (nil) 0x34f804 0x34f810 - stub fixme:advapi:LookupAccountNameW (null) L"fab" 0x16d190 0x34f808 0x16d1a8 0x34f804

Improving lowering for memcmp is definitely something we should do for all targets. Doing it in a target specific way is decidedly non-ideal. It looks like we already have some code in SelectionDAGBuilder which tries to optimize the lowering for the memcpy library call. I am a bit confused by the problem you are trying to solve. Are you specifically interested in lowering for constant

Hi Wei, Wei Mi wrote: > Sanjoy and Andy, thanks a lot for your suggestions. > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Trick<atrick at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> On Aug 23, 2016, at 11:30 PM, Sanjoy Das<sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Wei, >>> >>> I've not seen GCC's SCEV so I cannot

Timo, Please check the code. I didn't add it, but a real_lip might be useful for some people as well. Also, I notice that pop3-proxy is doing a different xsession than the imap proxy. Is there an xsession standard that is different between the two, or just an oversight in the code? Both send the remote address/port, but only imap proxy sends the local address/port. This patch declares