similar to: How to install rgeoda in R

El lun., 30 oct. 2023 12:26, Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand at nhh.no> escribi?: > I also noticed this: > > https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/13/gnome_proposes_dropping_x11/ > > which is concerning. Until now, I've retained X11 on Fedora because of > difficulties in screen sharing via zoom in Wayland sessions. > KDE Plasma user here. FWIW, I've been using Wayland

I also noticed this: https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/13/gnome_proposes_dropping_x11/ which is concerning. Until now, I've retained X11 on Fedora because of difficulties in screen sharing via zoom in Wayland sessions. Roger -- Roger Bivand Emeritus Professor Norwegian School of Economics Postboks 3490 Ytre Sandviken, 5045 Bergen, Norway Roger.Bivand at nhh.no

The third report on the R-spatial evolution project has been published. https://r-spatial.org/r/2023/04/10/evolution3.html It links back to earlier blogs and presentations, and focuses on work that maintainers of R packages and workflows using rgdal, rgeos and maptools need to put in train now before the packages are archived on CRAN. The first changes will occur in June 2023, and the

The third report on the R-spatial evolution project has been published. https://r-spatial.org/r/2023/04/10/evolution3.html It links back to earlier blogs and presentations, and focuses on work that maintainers of R packages and workflows using rgdal, rgeos and maptools need to put in train now before the packages are archived on CRAN. The first changes will occur in June 2023, and the

A new version of the sp package, 2.0-0, has been published on CRAN. This new version defaults to using the sf package rather than the rgdal package, and deprecates use of the rgeos package. These changes are described in https://r-spatial.org/r/2023/05/15/evolution4.html, and lead up to the planned archiving of the retiring packages: maptools, rgdal and rgeos in October 2023. This version issues

A new version of the sp package, 2.0-0, has been published on CRAN. This new version defaults to using the sf package rather than the rgdal package, and deprecates use of the rgeos package. These changes are described in https://r-spatial.org/r/2023/05/15/evolution4.html, and lead up to the planned archiving of the retiring packages: maptools, rgdal and rgeos in October 2023. This version issues

The link suggested by Ben is over 7 years old, so using the CRAN Task View: https://cran.r-project.org/web/views/Spatial.html, which is up-to-date, and https://rspatial.org/index.html, because the terra package has largely replaced the raster package. Please consider following up on the R-sig-geo mailing list: https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo. Hope this helps, Roger -- Roger

The legacy R spatial infrastructure packages maptools, rgdal and rgeos will be archived by CRAN on Monday, October 16, 2023; rgrass7 has already been replaced by rgrass and will be archived with the retiring packages. The choice of date matches the previously announced archiving during October 2023, and the specific date matches the release schedule of Bioconductor 3.18 (some Bioconductor

The legacy R spatial infrastructure packages maptools, rgdal and rgeos will be archived by CRAN on Monday, October 16, 2023; rgrass7 has already been replaced by rgrass and will be archived with the retiring packages. The choice of date matches the previously announced archiving during October 2023, and the specific date matches the release schedule of Bioconductor 3.18 (some Bioconductor

Ari, There were multiple errors in the acs package. If CRAN states that the maintainer abandoned it, that is what happened. Had you reached out to Ezra Glenn (cc-ed here) and offered to help keep the package maintained, this hiccup need not have happened. The three problems were: 1) stale URLs using http: not https:, of which some are dead (locally changed to https:, so reported as such):

Roger, just to you: Thanks for taking the time! I hope that Ari follows your recommendation, fingers crossed. Best wishes, Achim On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, Roger Bivand via R-help wrote: > Ari, > > There were multiple errors in the acs package. If CRAN states that the maintainer abandoned it, that is what happened. Had you reached out to Ezra Glenn (cc-ed here) and offered to help keep

The rgeoda maintainer seems to be having difficulty keeping up with required changes to be supported on CRAN. This may get corrected soon or never. There are instructions for compiling it yourself at https://geodacenter.github.io/rgeoda/ or you can contact the maintainer about their plans for getting it back on CRAN from there. On November 9, 2024 9:01:05 AM PST, D <dykim7411 at gmail.com>

When trying to install rgeoda in R, I received an error message: Warning in install.packages : package ?rgeoda? is not available for this version of R A version of this package for your version of R might be available elsewhere, see the ideas at https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-patched/R-admin.html#Installing-packages How could I install the code of rgeoda? Any advice would be

On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 09:48, Roger Bivand via R-SIG-Fedora < r-sig-fedora at r-project.org> wrote: > Building R 4.5.0 from source on Fedora 42 hits problems because 42 ships > with Tcl/Tk 9. tcl8-devel and tk8-devel are available and can be used, but > I haven't yet found a viable incantation yet. Neither R released nor devel > support Tcl/Tk 9

On Sat, 10 Nov 2018, Andreas Storvik Strauman wrote: > Hello! I'm confused as to what the actual problem with includeRnw is? Is > the problem that it relies on R-knitr? Before it would be withdrawn, may > I be given an opportunity to fix said problem? Yes, the problem is that it expesses an external dependence on anything outside texlive. On packaging systems (for me Fedora),

Hello! I'm confused as to what the actual problem with includeRnw is? Is the problem that it relies on R-knitr? Before it would be withdrawn, may I be given an opportunity to fix said problem? includeRnw only invokes the already existing R installation, and should not affect any other global settings or affect the installation in any way. If this is the case, it's a bug and I'd

On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 at 15:17, Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand at nhh.no> wrote: > > On upgrading my F28 to F29, I've found that R-core and a number of R > packages: > > R-evaluate R-glue R-highr R-knitr R-magrittr R-markdown R-mime R-stringi > R-stringr R-yaml > > are installed, although I only ever install R from source and always keep > my Rs locally. So I

Thanks to Roger Bivand, my problem was solved. binutils 2.14 was updatet to binutils 2.15, as indicated under. Geir Helge Systad Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Arctic Ecology, Polarmilj??senteret, N-9296 Troms??, Norway Adress aug-04 to feb-05: Albert Pettersonsvei 13, N-5750 Odda fax +47 85 03 82 14 phone +47 53 64 24 94 mobil +47 91 63 70 55 E-mail: geir.systad at nina.no

Dear All I would really appreciate some help with a script which a colleague wrote for me, but I am having problems running (and have not been able to contact my colleague). The script is designed to compare the area of suitable habitat in binary projections of a large number of species current and future distributions, and create an excel file detailing the total area suitable in the

A new release of rgdal, a package providing bindings for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library for reading and writing spatial data, has reached CRAN. This release changes the error handling mechanisms, and is more fully described in a posting on R-sig-geo: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo/2011-July/012126.html If any users observe unexpected behaviour following update, please