similar to: 1.0.1 release candidate 2

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.1.tar.gz.sig Lots of small fixes. * deliver: If Return-Path doesn't contain user and domain, don't try to bounce the mail (this is how it was supposed to work earlier too) * deliver: %variables in mail setting coming from userdb aren't expanded anymore (again how it should have worked).

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.1.tar.gz.sig Lots of small fixes. * deliver: If Return-Path doesn't contain user and domain, don't try to bounce the mail (this is how it was supposed to work earlier too) * deliver: %variables in mail setting coming from userdb aren't expanded anymore (again how it should have worked).

http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.0.1rc3.tar.gz Looks like I managed to do a lot of changes today. So I'll wait a few more days before v1.0.1 release. The important changes since rc2: + deliver: Added -e parameter to write rejection error to stderr and exit with EX_NOPERM instead of sending the rejection by executing sendmail. + dovecot --log-error logs now a warning, an error and a

Hi All I just upgraded to v1.0.1 so that I could try out the new SMS feature. When I did this, I noticed that my outbound SIP call to Broadvoice was very choppy, so I hung up. The system would not release the call, so I restarted the server. When it came up, it started loading * then said threw up a segmentation fault in res_crypto.so. It kept respawning until it ran out of RAM. I restarted

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major bug just waiting for v1.0 to be released. :) People wanting new features should start testing the upcoming v1.1. http://dovecot.org/nightly/

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz.sig It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major bug just waiting for v1.0 to be released. :) People wanting new features should start testing the upcoming v1.1. http://dovecot.org/nightly/

I have an application that works fine in development mode under plain old CGI and I''m trying to get it running under FCGI with multiple hours of frustration. Lately, I am running dispatch.fcgi standalone from the command line. It gives me a not very helpful one line error message; Status: 500 Internal Server Error The log file produces a not very helpful 2 line message;

http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.0.2-rc.tar.gz Unless someone finds something broken, I'll release v1.0.2 in a few days. The most important changes since v1.0.1: * dbox isn't built anymore by default. It will be redesigned so it shouldn't be used. + Maildir: Support reading dovecot-uidlist (v3) files created by Dovecot v1.1. - Maildir: "UIDVALIDITY changed" errors

Hi, The LoginEngine has been updated to 1.0.1. Notable changes: * User model now does very basic email validation * All tests now pass on both Rails 1.0 and 1.1 * Many bugs fixed! Please refer to the Engines documentation for how to update. http://www.rails-engines.org/download The subversion URL for the tag is: http://svn.rails-engines.org/login_engine/tags/rel_1.0.1 = v1.0.1 * Added

When logs (e.g. /var/log/maillog) are rotated (e.g. to /var/log/maillog-YYYYMDD) is there a way via systemd or whatever to assign read permission to a specific group? Right now, for example - ls -l maillog* -rw------- 1 root root 3105240 Mar 13 22:04 maillog -rw------- 1 root root 1079031 Feb 24 04:39 maillog-20190224 -rw------- 1 root root 7237640 Mar 1 12:59 maillog-20190228 -rw------- 1

Well, I grabbed the tarballs this morning and found that of the three new releases, only libogg1.1 would compile without and issue. I had to recompile my flac1.1.0 for ogg support, and it gave me a new error (or I wasnt paying attention, anyway...) it will finish compiling and install, but I only ran make check on the original compile, not the new one with OggFLAC attached and stuff...

Hello, I have a strange problem with Samba and LDAP backend with the statement valid users = @group. The valid users = @username works great, but the @group oder +group statement does not work. But the users in the @group does never get access to the shares! I'm using Samba 3.2.5-4 on Debian Lenny the LDAP server is located at an Debian Etch system. But this ldap server works quite good.

Hi, I've a question about the syntax of the valid users option. Any help is greatly appreciated! Here is the Background: samba 3.0.4 Linux as Domain Member Active Directory, not in Native Mode Compiler opions: --with-winbind --with-pam --with-smbmount The goal is to authenticate via the Windows Domain and allow access via Windows groups. The syntax in my smb.conf looks like this:

Greetings list, I'm haveing problem with FreeRADIUS v1.0.1-3 which came with CentOS 4.1 FreeRADIUS refuses to use system accounts for authentication. The latest freeradius-1.0.4 is working correctly. Can we have this update or have to wail till RH release new rpm src? Thanks, -j

First of all, I think dovecot is really fantastic and I have thanks for all the hard work. I think it will be the best fit for my ~5000 users when I have it setup completely. We normally have approx 500 concurrent IMAP connections during the day. I am trying to convert from courier-imap to dovecot, but I have an issue with public namespace folders that are not writable by certain users.

Dear Friends, Is It Possible to Make a *Share* Visible to a List of Users *Only* ? e.g. If have shares Likes Account, Sales, Support Then I would Like make respective *share* visible *only* to persons in respective dept. Thanks and Best Regards.

Thank you Kees. On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 09:37, Kees van Vloten via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I am currently running at 4.19.2 but I have run 4.18.6 and 4.18.5. I did > not experience any issues with nested group lookups, which many of the > filters rely on. Interestingly, I've now found that (on my current DCs, running 4.18.5), ldbsearch *does* seem to return the

Folks-- I'm working with an old system I set up to copy files from one local directory to another. I was using rdist for this, but I would prefer to shift it over to rsync. The one thing I'm missing is the trivial ability to force the group owernship of the destination files to a specific group. A read through the manpage and various searches on the web do not turn up any helpful hints

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I have a small Sieve script that tries to use vacation that segfaults. The script is the one from http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve. When I change the email address (I changed the local part into "skai"), hence, vacation is skipped, the mail is delivered without any problem. ==== script start require ["fileinto",

Hi, I'm running Samba Version 3.0.25c on Solaris 10 8/07 on X86 hardware. It's successfully joined to AD. But, and there always is a but, if : * A user is a member of SomeGroup * and the share alllows SomeGroup to access it * and SomeGroup is NOT what the user has set as their Primary Group in Active Directory then * Samba will recognize that the user can access the share * but,