similar to: samba-tool domain backup offline fails.

Hi Jennifer, that's actually a very good guess... I'll check later on and report back. CJ Jennifer Sutton via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu (segunda, 14/10/2024 ?(s) 00:11): > On 13/10/24 6:53 am, Carlos Jesus via samba wrote: > > Hello all, > > Hoping I never have to restore it, I'm trying to do an offline backup of > my > > domain. On a DC

On 13/10/24 6:53 am, Carlos Jesus via samba wrote: > Hello all, > Hoping I never have to restore it, I'm trying to do an offline backup of my > domain. On a DC I "croned" /usr/bin/samba-tool domain backup offline > --targetdir=/usr/local/backups/samba > > The backup systematically fails leaving a folder > INCOMPLETEsambabackupfileXXXXX with a small .tar inside.

Try this maintenance procedures and report back: http://samba.bigbird.es/doku.php?id=samba:dc-maintenance ?? ?Find and delete ?tombstone? items samba-tool domain tombstones expunge --tombstone-lifetime=0 ?? ?Check domain databases and automatically fix things. samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes On 12 Oct 2024 at 18:53 +0100, Carlos Jesus via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>,

Hello all, Hoping I never have to restore it, I'm trying to do an offline backup of my domain. On a DC I "croned" /usr/bin/samba-tool domain backup offline --targetdir=/usr/local/backups/samba The backup systematically fails leaving a folder INCOMPLETEsambabackupfileXXXXX with a small .tar inside. If I run it "by hand", I get the same result. The (what I think is the)

Try: http://samba.bigbird.es/doku.php?id=samba:aditional-dc Regards, LP On 25 Sep 2024 at 20:19 +0200, Carlos Jesus via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>, wrote: > Hello all, > I could use some advice on setting up this project. > I have a small W2k8-R2 domain with a single DC. It runs great in spite of > its age. > However, the redundancy of the system is, of course, low.

On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 17:22 +0100, Andrea Venturoli via samba wrote: > Hello. > > After upgrading some DCs (in different domains) to 4.10, I'm trying > to > take backups with samba-tool. > > I'm not using "online" backups, as they require typing a password, > so > are not usable in a script. > > IIUIC, "offline" backups can be used

Hello. After upgrading some DCs (in different domains) to 4.10, I'm trying to take backups with samba-tool. I'm not using "online" backups, as they require typing a password, so are not usable in a script. IIUIC, "offline" backups can be used even if Samba is running. However, they seem to get stuck: > root at dc1:~ # samba-tool domain backup offline

On 13/12/24 7:34 pm, Georg Weickelt via samba wrote: > Hello, > > After updating to Windows 24H2, I get an error message when connecting > to remotedesktop: "Authentication error. > The requested encryption type is not supported by the Kerberos domain > controller." > > The domain controllers run with Samba 4.21.2-Ubuntu > What can be done in this

jesus! learn to use precedence On 11/26/14, Harry Mills <harry at opendium.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have an issue with a vacation message in a sieve script. I can't see > an error in the script itself. > > Pigeonhole version: 0.4.2-32 > Dovecot Version: 2.2.10 > > The script was created by Ingo (part of the Horde suite), but I think > the script is fine.

I have a Fedora Core 1 machine and I am trying to install "smbldap-tools-0.8.4-1.1.fc2.dag.i386.rpm" However, I am having the following problem: [root@jesus root]# rpm -i smbldap*.rpm warning: smbldap-tools-0.8.4-1.1.fc2.dag.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 6b8d79e6 error: Failed dependencies: perl(Net::LDAP) is needed by smbldap-tools-0.8.4-1.1.fc2.dag

Hello, I've just upgraded to 4.9.6  and can't seem to be able to use the 'offline' backup?   It seems that the only options are:  online, rename, and backup. Can someone confirm this?   I plan to get to migrating to 4.10.2, but I'm doing it incrementally:   v4.7.6  -> v4.8.11 -> v4.9.6 -> v4.10.2 Before going to the v4.10.2, I want to backup my AD database using

On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 13:33 +0200, Trenta sis via samba wrote: > Hi, > > Using old samba_backup with 4.4.x a paramter can be defined to keep > some copies of backup and purge automatically. > > I'm searching same option with new samba backup offline or online, > but > I can't find, where is it? That is left to the administrator to handle, it isn't part of the

On Mon, 2019-11-11 at 08:35 +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 2019-11-10 21:41, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > Is this unpatched Samba > > Yes and no. > Yes: it's the stock FreeBSD's Samba port. > No: the FreeBSD port has itself several patches WRT the original Samba > distribution. > > > > > and what is the full backtrace on that tdbbackup?

On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 09:23 +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 2019-11-11 09:41, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > > > and what is the full backtrace on that tdbbackup? > > > > > > You mean: compile with debug symbols, attach gdb and get stack trace? > > > If so, I'll do it, but I'll need some time. > > > > Yes, that's what I

On 2019-11-13 13:11, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > I'm open to suggestions... Some further step... It's samba-tool itself that locks the file before calling tdbbackup. Running "samba-tool domain backup offline ..." spawns "tdbbackup -s .copy.tdb /var/db/samba4/private/secrets.ldb -r", which gets stuck. Running "tdbbackup -s .copy.tdb

On Thu, 2019-11-21 at 14:58 +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 2019-11-13 13:11, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > > I'm open to suggestions... > > Some further step... > > It's samba-tool itself that locks the file before calling tdbbackup. > > Running "samba-tool domain backup offline ..." spawns "tdbbackup -s > .copy.tdb

On Thu, July 23, 2020 16:16:30, Mani Wieser wrote: >>> ../../source4/nbt_server/interfaces.c:228(nbtd_add_socket) >>> Failed to bind to 127.0.162.1:137 - NT_STATUS_ADDRESS_ALREADY_ASSOCIATED > check where has port 137 occupied There is nothing listening on 137 [root at smb4-2 ~ (master)]# netstat -an | grep -i listen tcp4 0 0 192.168.18.162.22 *.*

On 23/07/2020 18:12, James B. Byrne via samba wrote: > > On Thu, July 23, 2020 16:16:30, Mani Wieser wrote: > >>>> ../../source4/nbt_server/interfaces.c:228(nbtd_add_socket) >>>> Failed to bind to 127.0.162.1:137 - NT_STATUS_ADDRESS_ALREADY_ASSOCIATED >> check where has port 137 occupied > There is nothing listening on 137 > > [root at smb4-2 ~

On 23/07/2020 18:36, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 06:31:09PM +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 23/07/2020 18:12, James B. Byrne via samba wrote: >>> On Thu, July 23, 2020 16:16:30, Mani Wieser wrote: >>> >>>>>> ../../source4/nbt_server/interfaces.c:228(nbtd_add_socket) >>>>>> Failed to bind to

On Thu, July 23, 2020 14:05, James B. Byrne wrote: . > > The jail is not running anything other than sshd and webmin, as the netstat > results clearly show. The issue appears to me to be that samba-tool cannot > bind to that port even though it is available. > > Why would an offline backup tool need to attach to any port at all? -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel