similar to: acts_as_paranoid and alias_method_chain

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "acts_as_paranoid and alias_method_chain"

2007 Jan 28
0
problems with acts_as_paranoid (noticed while using acts_as_versioned)
hello, I''m using the trunk versions of both plugins. I''m running into this error when I run a migration to try and create the versioned table for the model ''Note'' stack level too deep /Users/Adam/dev/sweetspot/app/trunk/config/../vendor/plugins/ acts_as_paranoid/init.rb:5:in `belongs_to_without_deleted''
2007 Aug 03
0
acts_as_paranoid and Association Extensions (has_one troubles)
Hi... Isn''t there a proper way or hack/workaround for the following? * For the example with unfortunate disabilities.. look below,,, Usage of has_* (associationmethods) do {def with_deleted AccociatedModel#with_scope} {Paranoid''s#find_with_deleted}... The has_one associations give me a nil object when invoking it with Model.association_OBJECT.with_deleted. Has_many does like
2008 Feb 04
0
gettext and acts_as_paranoid gives stack overflow
HI all, I just started using acts_as_paranoid, and I''ve been using gettext for a while. Now I get the below errors when I run rake gettext:updatepo. It''s interesting that the errors seem to stack up, so the first file just errors on belongs_to_without_deleted, the second file has a layer of eval, the second has two layers of eval, and so forth. I''ve tried for a while
2008 Apr 15
1
acts_as_paranoid Unknown key(s): with_deleted
Trying this straight from the README: I have acts_as_paranoid in my model (Course), and added the deleted_at column. This is OK: Course.find_with_deleted(:all) Course.find(:all, :with_deleted => true) gives: ArgumentError: Unknown key(s): with_deleted from /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.0.2/lib/ active_support/core_ext/hash/keys.rb:49:in `assert_valid_keys''
2008 Apr 17
4
acts_as_paranoid is making me crazy
Acts_as_paranoid is giving me a headache when performing migrations. For some reason when I perform a migration I get a "stack level too deep" error. If I comment out the database inserts that are performed (countries, regions, and a base admin) it works well. Even after minimizing the data that is inserted on the migration to one record it still throws the same error. When running
2006 Mar 13
1
adding custom cache field
Hello, I needed to add custom cache field for one of my application. I thought I will share the code showing how to do this. This code below creates and maintain a custom cache field, for keeping track of totals. Say, you have accounts, and for each account there are transactions (either deposit/withdrawal), and one will like to keep track of the total balance for an account. So, let there be a
2005 Dec 11
4
Problem with acts_as_paranoid: "ArgumentError: Unknown key(s): group"
Here''s the full error: 1) Error: test_add_message_to_existing_ticket(TicketTest): ArgumentError: Unknown key(s): group /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.2.4/lib/active_support/core_ext/hash/keys.rb:48:in `assert_valid_keys'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/acts_as_paranoid-0.2/lib/acts_as_paranoid.rb:125:in `validate_find_options''
2006 Jul 16
0
Why does belongs_to handle "conflicts" this way?
When you define belongs_to in a model, you can either access association or association_id. I was wondering how Rails would handle things if you set each one to be different. I made two simple models: class Foo < ActiveRecord::Base; end class Bar < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :foo end Now here''s a script/console session. >> f = Foo.create => #<Foo:0x270ec10
2006 Mar 02
4
Getting Acts_as_Paranoid to work with validates_uniqueness_of
Hello I''ve been using Acts_as_Parnoid for a while and it has been working well but I am now having a slight issue with it. I have a company table were I would like to use validates_uniqueness_of :company_name. This validation works if a company exists in the database and has not been deleted. However, I also would like the validates_uniqueness_of to work if a company has
2006 Nov 09
2
redefining the method belongs_to in ActiveRecord::Base
Hi. I''ve tried to redefine the method belongs_to in ActiveRecord::Base, so every time a model is defined as belonging to :attachment, it should have some additional methods. I tried to do an alias of belongs_to, but this was not successful. The error message in Webrick was > Booting WEBrick... ./script/../config/../lib/ActiveRecordExtensions.rb:67: undefined method
2009 May 19
0
Extending finders to include a session variable as an option??
We have a Page model which acts_as_paranoid. AAP modifies ActiveRecord finders to ignore any records marked as deleted unless the :with_deleted => true option is supplied. We have a UI element which allows users to toggle whether or not to display deleted Pages, their current setting being stored in a session variable, session[:show_deleted]. What we would like is to automagically have
2005 Apr 27
4
has_many syntax
Hi all, I have the following inside of an AR class definition: relationships=ActiveRecord::Base.connection.select_all(my_relationships_sql) relationships.each do |relationship| has_many RelatedItems, :class_name => relationship[''RelatedClass''], :foreign_key => relationship[''ForeignKey''] end This kind of works, but how can I assign the name of the
2012 Feb 23
1
Bug in nested_attributes_for: question about best way to patch
I''ve discovered what I''m pretty confident is unexpected behavior in accepts_nested_attributes_for, and am developing a patch, but I''ve encountered a question about how the core team would prefer the implementation to look. Here''s the bug: when assigning to a belongs_to relationship (and I believe one-to-one, but I haven''t verified yet) if you mark the
2006 May 11
0
acts_as_paranoid, aliasing and nested scopes in Rails 1.1
I have a real problem with the acts_as_paranoid plugin. The aliasing of find and so the nested scope does not seem to work at all, when combining it with similar plugins. The description: I made a copy of ''acts_as_paranoid'' in the plugin directory, renamed it to ''acts_as_very_new''(just a nonsense plugin for testing), and simplified the code (original code
2006 Jan 10
5
problems overriding module with plugin
Hi I am trying to create a plug-in to fix the error in the rails core produced by the multiple delete on a HABTM relationship. I have confirmed that my plug-in is being included into the base during runtime however the code does not seem to be overridding the base class. module ActiveRecord module Associations module ClassMethods def has_and_belongs_to_many(association_id, options =
2006 May 20
1
acts_as_paranoid overrides ActiveRecord::Base??
Guys, I am trying to figure out what exactly does this line do at the end of "acts_as_paranoid" plugin? ActiveRecord::Base.send :include, Caboose::Acts::Paranoid::ActiveRecord My problem: I have some classes that I use acts_as_paranoid, and others with tagging support. Classes declared as taggable, throw error, which appears to be in the acts_as_paranoid version of the
2006 Jun 19
3
can''t dump anonymous class Class
I''m trying to create a document upload system, where most of the code is the super class Document and just the path to file on the system is controlled by the sub classes. When I attempt to use my code, I get the following when I try to save the document. can''t dump anonymous class Class Any ideas? ** Migration ** class CreateDocuments < ActiveRecord::Migration def
2011 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] <badref> showed up when duplicating a list of dependent instructions
Hi Chuck, > std::vector<Instruction *>::iterator p; > Instruction * pi = PREVIOUS_POSITION; > BasicBlock * pb = PREVIOUS_POSITION->getParent(); > > for(p = coll.begin(); p != coll.end(); ++p){ > Instruction * CurI = * p; > Instruction * CloneI = CurI->clone(); clone doesn't know have any magical way of knowing that it should update the instruction's
2011 May 09
2
[LLVMdev] <badref> showed up when duplicating a list of dependent instructions
I collected a sequence of LLVM instructions, want to make a copy of each and insert them into a PREVIOUS location inside the same function (all globals and locals are properly declared before the PREVIOUS location). Here is the list of instructions I want to duplicate and insert: 0 %90 = load i32* @strstart, align 4 1 %91 = add i32 %90, 2 2 %88 = load i32* @ins_h, align 4 3 %92 =
2007 Apr 12
0
Does Ferret have problems with #alias_method_chain ?
Hi all, I have this in my class: class Party < AR::B acts_as_ferret :store_class_name => true, :remote => true, :fields => (self.content_columns.map(&:name) rescue []) + %w(main_identifier) class << self # #count is also defined, omitted for clarity def find_with_destroyed_scope(*args) with_destroyed_scope do