similar to: Question regarding 'username map' & 'min domain uid'

On Wed, 09 Oct 2024 17:36:34 +0000 bd730c5053df9efb via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi all! > > I was following a recent thread here and read Rowland Penny's answer > (https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2024-October/249858.html) > stating > > [...]I have stopped using 'username map' & 'min domain uid' because, > has you have

On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 18:46:04 +0000 bd730c5053df9efb <bd730c5053df9efb at proton.me> wrote: > > Hi Rowland! > > Thank you for your reply but wouldn't operations like the one > described in > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs#Setting_Share_Permissions_and_ACLs > fail if the uid of the user that is performing said operations does

On Thursday, October 10th, 2024 at 16:14, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 18:46:04 +0000 > bd730c5053df9efb bd730c5053df9efb at proton.me wrote: > > > Hi Rowland! > > > > Thank you for your reply but wouldn't operations like the one > > described in > >

On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 16:35:14 -0400 Greg Dickie <greg at justaguy.ca> wrote: > Hey Rowland, > > Sorry, I'm thick. I understand why you would not want to create a > linux user called Administrator but then where will the credentials > come from? In my AD, I do not have a user called Administrator. I > guess I must have a user with RID 500 though, I'll look for

Am 2017-01-01 um 16:04 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > So it looks like you only have 77 users, but cannot have any local Unix > users because your Unix users start at 1000. How do feel about changing > the uidNumbers ? feels scary and I'd like to avoid that :-) > if so, the easiest way will be to open the AD database > with ldbedit: > > ldbedit -e nano -H

On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:25:14 -0700 (PDT) James Browning via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 10/25/2023 11:16 AM PDT Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:53:07 -0500 > > Ham via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > It appears that none of

Hello everybody! I know this has been asked multiple times but I haven't found an answer yet so here I go again. I manage a domain, not too large but large enough to make it a complex task to recreate an entire domain and rejoin every computer, and the domain was created long ago without an ad subdomain so, is there any way to recreate an entire domain renaming the domain part of everything

I'm testing Samba 2.2.5 with winbind. I can successfully authenticate domain users who do and don't have corresponding UNIX accounts as well as domain users who do have a UNIX account. Files created from PC side by usera show up in UNIX "ls -l" as owned by usera so I thought the automatic username mapping was working correctly, but I found out that usera isn't being

Hai Ian, Can you run this one again on both servers and pm me both outputs. I'll have a good look. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh I've updated the file, so do use the new one. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Ian > Coetzee via samba >

Background: I'm trying to make sure my Unix and NT users are being assigned the correct UID from both platforms so they own files correctly from both sides. I was hoping to avoid username maps since our users with cross platform access already have matching usernames on both sides (or will when we reconfigure). I've been playing with several parameters, and fixed some things, but I did

Hi all! As a long slackware user I'm a total noob in pam and I'm banging my head against a wall trying to set it up correctly to play nice with slackware's default pam configuration. One of the things I'm trying to accomplish is to be able to logon while the ad domain is available and have pam_mount automount the samba shares and to be able to do an offline logon and skip the

Hi all! On Monday, January 8th, 2024 at 08:23, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 15:00:27 +0100 > Marco Gaiarin via samba samba at lists.samba.org wrote: > > > Mandi! bd730c5053df9efb via samba > > In chel di` si favelave... > > > > > idmap config smadom:schema_mode = rfc2307 > > > > Sorry but

Hi Sven, I had a quick look and its much better. Few small points. For the members. This might be a choice, but on the fileservers, the loggings is a bit difference still. And krb5-locales is on one but not the other. Last i see, there is no user mapping file for the members. Which normaly have !root = DOM\Administrator ( or BUILTIN\Administrator, depending on you setup )

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, June 30, 2016 2:59 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I've been googling, and haven't yet found the answer: does anyone here >> know if a MegaRAID SAS 2008 (falcon) (rev 03) can handle drives bigger >> than 2TB? > > One way to find out is to plug 4TB drive and take a look. Another is to > ask one who has the same controller

Hey Rowland, Sorry, I'm thick. I understand why you would not want to create a linux user called Administrator but then where will the credentials come from? In my AD, I do not have a user called Administrator. I guess I must have a user with RID 500 though, I'll look for that. Thanks for your help, Greg On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 3:09?AM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at

On Thu, 2023-10-12 at 21:01 +0000, bd730c5053df9efb via samba wrote: > Hi all! > I use bacula to perform automated backups of everything needed to get > my network up and running in case of disaster and when I backup my > DC's I execute a script which creates an offline backup of the DC > which I then backup to an external storage. I would like to be able > to create an

On Wed, 06 Dec 2023 15:06:25 +0000 bd730c5053df9efb via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi! > > Thank you botho for your answers! I ran into some problems with the > FSMO migration caused by the "kdc default domain supported enctypes" > and "kdc supported enctypes" so after correcting that and verifying > that DC2 was working again I shut

On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:55:07 +0000 bd730c5053df9efb via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello everybody! > > I know this has been asked multiple times but I haven't found an > answer yet so here I go again. I manage a domain, not too large but > large enough to make it a complex task to recreate an entire domain > and rejoin every computer, and the domain

On Thursday, August 22nd, 2024 at 08:24, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:55:07 +0000 > bd730c5053df9efb via samba samba at lists.samba.org wrote: > > > Hello everybody! > > > > I know this has been asked multiple times but I haven't found an > > answer yet so here I go again. I manage a domain, not too

On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 11:58:02 +0000 bd730c5053df9efb via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Rowland! Thanks for your reply! > > Is it possible to rename de DNS realm only and leave the NETBIOS name > as is or is it mandatory to rename both? > I have never used this tool (never had reason to), but it appears that you have to rename both. Just in case you missed it,