similar to: Corrupt Message?

Dear Timo, Would there be any sense in giving Dovecot the option to split folders into multiple subfolders when they reached a specified size (probably message count) limit? Dovecot would monitor folders and when they reached, say, 10,000 messages, silently split the folder on the filesystem to ensure that access remains fast. I know that Dovecot scales very well but this would give

Hi, If an IMAP fetch is issued some "short" time after a message was delivered with dovecot deliver then dovecot reports wrong (zero) values for that new message. Afterward, it reports the information OK. This causes problems to our IMAP client. The problem is easily reproduced with a large message on a slow machine. I'm using dovecot 1.0.10 Here's a sample trace: 1 uid fetch

> bclark wrote: > > > The interesting thing is, once I have some mail on the dovecot, > the date > > displayed on Mozilla is correct, but the mail shown throught > outlook, > > shows todays date (thats for all mail). > > Each mail has (at least) two dates : the date it was sent (stored > in the > headers), and the date it arrived (in Maildir, the

Hi guys, I've run into an odd little problem. We use SquirrelMail as the basis for our webmail. Recently I've had a user complaining that the "Received" time on mail in the Sent folder has changed between logins. The change is always been by +1 hours or -5 hours. While checking, our developer had a time changed by +2 hours. On refresh it changed back. He poked through the code

Dovecot will soon have a plugin which allows running a nightly cronjob to expunge mails from configured mailboxes which have been in there for a configurable amount of time. For example the configuration could be: plugin { # Trash 7d, Spam 30d expire = Trash 7 Spam 30 } It also supports using Dovecot's lib-dict to keep track of the mailboxes and their oldest mail's timestamp, so that

We're trying some migration tests ... from CommuniGate to Dovecot. The migration program does an APPEND into the new mailbox: src>: a0 FETCH 2900 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE RFC822.PEEK) src<: * 2900 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "29-Aug-2005 18:36:54 +0000" RFC822 {1194157} src<: ) dst>: bAPP APPEND "INBOX" (\Seen) "29-Aug-2005 18:36:54 +0000" {1194157}

Hi, Dovecotters. In the Maildir code, dovecot-0.99.10/src/lib-storage/index/maildir/maildir-copy.c, I see that hardlinks are used. It seems that (line 185) if MAILDIR_COPY_WITH_HARDLINKS is exported, then copying is attempted by using link. Having problems reading the source / flow of control, I resort to this list. When a file is linked, the mtime is naturally kept on the destination. This

Using the latest dovecot-stable (20050213) with pine, I get an empty "from" header in my e-mails. This doesn't happen with 1.0.59-test, nor did it happen with the first dovecot-stable (20050131). A partial connection log is below: 1.0-test59: IMAP DEBUG 15:23:32 2/13: 00000007 FETCH 1:41 (UID ENVELOPE BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (Newsgroups Content-MD5 Content-Disposition

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 17:27 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote: > >> Timo Sirainen wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote: >>> >>> >>>> So, what would >>>> have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the >>>> phone think all of the messages are older

Hi folks. I just converted my site from UW+mbox to dovecot+maildir (stable-test59, 2005/02/25). For the most part, everything is great. The server seems faster and less memory intense than the UW server (this part has made me very happy). And it's definitely more user friendly to me than Courier. There is one thing however... A few of my users are using the web based mail reader

Hi, We are using Dovecot with maildir, and the mail client requests flags, internaldate, and uid for all messages on folder open, which on average takes 3 seconds, but for large folders is much longer. It seems like I want mail_cache_fields to include "flags", but which date corresponds to internaldate? date.received? Is UID always cached for messages, or does it have to read through

>>>>> Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > On 09.09.2017 12:33, Steinar Bang wrote: >> When a message is copied to a folder on dovecot with mbox storage, is >> the mtime of the saved mbox file set to the time of the save? [snip!] > Internaldate is picked from the separating 'From' line in mbox file. > "From user at example.org Thu Oct 20

Hello List, After moving the mail store via dsync backup to a different location the following command doveadm expunge -u user mailbox "Trash" savedbefore 10d deleted ALL mails in Trash instead of messages older than 10 days. It looks like X-SAVEDATE is somehow wrong... A fetch 1:* (internaldate x-savedate) * 1 FETCH (INTERNALDATE "28-Dec-2007 14:49:58 +0100" X-SAVEDATE

When a message is copied to a folder on dovecot with mbox storage, is the mtime of the saved mbox file set to the time of the save? Or is the mtime set to the Date: field of the source message that is saved? If there is a difference in the behaviour, do someone know the dovecot version number where the change happened? The reason I'm asking is a problem reported on the Gnus imap client in

Hi all, Robert, Jerry, There were new emails overnight and both Thunderbird and Roundcube displayed them. I enabled Outlook debug mode and please find 2 logs of Send/Receive with no new emails. Scroll below to see 3rd log with "workaround" and mails downloaded. "Intializing connection [1C7E2830] IMAP: 08:53:03 [db] Setting internal codepage to 1200 IMAP: 08:53:03 [db]

Hi. It seems that dovecot is using the current time, not a maildir file's mtime for INTERNALDATE when a message is re-indexed: $ cd Index $ rm -rf .INBOX $ cd ../Maildir/cur $ stat * File: `1392914632.P54451Q0M08633.smtpin01,S=2215,W=2249:2,' Size: 960 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 1048576 regular file Device: 36h/54d Inode: 11132959 Links: 1 Access: (0600/-rw-------)

Hello ML, Hello Stephan, > Hmm. Probably, the timezone configuration (i.e. the contents of TZ > timezone environment variable) somehow doesn't reach the final stages > of e-mail delivery. Well. I tried several ways of telling the lda or whatever is setting up the INTERNALDATE to use the CEST +0200. Although it is already setup on the server via a symlink from /etc/localtime to

Now that I have a working kvm setup, I thought I'd finally try how Zimbra works. This is mainly some microbenchmarking, so it may not have much to do with actual performance in real life. Setup: - 1GB memory given to kvm (from host's 2GB) - Intel Core 2 6600 (kvm uses only one CPU) - CentOS 5 - 15GB qcow2 image on XFS filesystem - Zimbra 5.0 RC2 RHEL5 x86_64 - Dovecot latest hg,

Hello, from time to time I keep getting problems with some emails causing signal 6. I've already reported those, but it seems not to be easy to find the cause. From the logs, it seems to occur in sieve implementation. I've checked the email envelopes tody by accident, probably this part of my telnet session might help: a11 fetch 1 all * 1 FETCH (RFC822.SIZE 16750 INTERNALDATE

I have a question which others must have encountered. I switched from uw-imap to dovecot-imap a few months ago and moved my fairly large mail archive (~15 yrs) by simply mounting both accounts in a mail app and simply copying my folders over. This worked well, and all my mail is in order when I view it in evolution or thunderbird on any number of machines. However, since our company uses MS