similar to: auth-master permission error

I''m running the 2.6.31.6 pv_ops dom0 kernel, libvirt 0.7.0 and Xen 3.4.1. When I try connecting to the Xen hypervisor using virsh it gives me a "Connection refused": root@grp-01-23-02:~# xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 1020 4 r----- 858.3 root@grp-01-23-02:~# virsh -c

Dear Spencer and Prof. Fox, Thank you for your replies. I'll very appreciate, if you have any ideas concerning the problem described below. First, I'd like to describe the model in brief. In general I consider a model with three equations. First one is for annual GRP growth - in general it looks like: 1) GRP growth per capita = G(investment, migration, initial GRP per

I have a large dataset grouped by a factor and I want to perform a regression on each data subset based on this factor. There are many ways to do this, posted here and elsewhere. I have tried several. However I found one method posted on the R wiki which works exactly as I want, and I like the elegance and simplicity of the solution, but I don't understand how it works. Its all in the formula

I posted this question way down at teh end of another thread realted to an error in step, but that was stupid since it really is another matter altogether. I should have posted it separately, as I have now done. The code below creates a data.frame comprising three marginally noisy surfaces. The code below (including a fix courtesy of David Winsemius that avoids a step function error through use

Hello, Just did a fresh install of xen-4.0 and using the 2.6.31.13 dom0 kernel. I have 6 linux debian guests running, and on my host console i am getting these errors rolling pretty constantly. "Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet, dropping a protocol 1 packet" I tried doing the ethtool -K eth0 tx off and same thing on peth0, using bridged mode for network config. Any tips?

Hello, Just did a fresh install of xen-4.0 and using the 2.6.31.13 dom0 kernel. I have 6 linux debian guests running, and on my host console i am getting these errors rolling pretty constantly. "Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet, dropping a protocol 1 packet" I tried doing the ethtool -K eth0 tx off and same thing on peth0, using bridged mode for network config. Any tips?

I am having great difficulty plotting what should be a simple graph. I have measured 1 'y' and 5 'x' variables in each of two groups. Linear regression shows significant differences in the slopes of the regression for each 'x' variable between the two groups. All that I want to do is to plot one graph that shows the scatterplot for the three groups (each group represented

Hi, I try to ask here, because I hope someone will help me understand this problem- I have fittet a glm in R with the results > glm1 <- > glm(log(claims)~log(sum)*as.factor(grp),family=gaussian(link="identity")) > summary(glm1) Call: glm(formula = log(claims) ~ log(sum) * as.factor(grp), family = gaussian(link = "identity")) Deviance Residuals: Min 1Q

Dear R-Helpers: I am using trying to use *ddply* to extract min and max of a particular column in a data.frame. I am using two different forms of the function: ## var_name_to_split is a string -- something like "var1" which is the name of a column in data.frame ddply( df, .(as.name(var_name_to_split)), function(x) c(min(x[ , 3] , max(x[ , 3]))) ## fails with an error - case 1 ddply(

Hi All, I am currently conducting a mixed model. I have 7 repeated measures on a simulated clinical trial. If I understand the model correctly, the outcome is the measure (as a factor) the predictors are clinical group and trial (1-7). The fixed factors are the measure and group. The random factors are the intercept and id and group. I tried using 2 functions to calculate mixed effects.

Dear R-helpers, the problem I'm facing today is to convince lattice to paint some areas in gray. The areas I would like to have in gray, are confidence bands I've googled around in the mailing list archives and eventually find some clues. This link is my starting point http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e2/help/07/04/15595.html I'm reproducing here the code for your convenience est

Hi, how can I get a more descriptive text instead of the variable names in my XY-lattice plot, according to the table below? Variable text acet = "Acetylaspartate Thalamus" chol = "Choline Thalamus" acetp = "Acetylaspartate parieoc" ino = "Inositole Thalamus" I could not find a solution. Please have a look at my syntax. Thanks a lot,

1. I did not attempt to sort through your voluminous code. But I suspect you are trying to reinvent wheels. 2. I don't understand this: "I've failed to find a solution after much searching of various R related forums." A web search on "error handling in R" **immediately** brought up ?tryCatch, which I think is what you want. If not, you should probably explain why it

tryCatch() is good for catching errors but not so good for warnings, as it does not let you resume evaluating the expression that emitted the warning. withCallingHandlers(), with its companion invokeRestart(), lets you collect the warnings while letting the evaluation run to completion. Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at

Is there a way to specify a Z matrix using the lmer function, where the model is written as y = X*Beta + Z*u + e? I am trying to reproduce smoothing methods illustrated in the paper "Smoothing with Mixed Model Software" my Long Ngo and M.P. Wand. published in the /Journal of Statistical Software/ in 2004 using the lme4 and Matrix packages. The code and data sets used can be found at

You can capture warnings by using withCallingHandlers. Here is an example, its help file has more information. dataList <- list( A = data.frame(y=c(TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE), x=1:5), B = data.frame(y=c(TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE), x=1:5), C = data.frame(y=c(FALSE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE), x=1:5)) withWarnings <- function(expr) { .warnings <- NULL # warning handler will

Sorry for posting this twice, but I still have not solved this problem and am hoping for some assistance. I am attempting to write a function that is flexible enough to respond to the user providing a formula (with a data= argument) or not (similar to plot(x,y) versus plot(y~x,data=data)). I have found a method to work with this in a simple case but am having trouble determining how to

Hi, The following function does work optimize.W<-function(W,k,G,Groups,cph.call,z){ n<-length(Groups) grp.wt<-rep(0,n) for(i in 1:(length(G))){ ind<-Groups == G[i] if(G[i]!=k){ grp.wt[ind]<-W[i] } elsegrp.wt[ind]<-1 } z<-data.frame(cbind(z,grp.wt=grp.wt)) #needed to make the case weights #part of the data

Although this should be trivial, I'm having a spot of trouble. I want to make a lattice plot of the format y1+y2 ~ x | grp but then fit a lm to each y variable and add an abline of those models in different colors. If the xyplot followed y~x|grp I would write a panel function as below, but I'm unsure of how to do that with y1 and y2 without reshaping the data before hand. Thoughts

I'm trying to understand better the differences between fixed and random effects by running very simple examples in the nlme package. My first attempt was to try doing a t-test in lme. This is very similar to the Rail example that comes with nlme, but it has two groups instead of five. So I try a1 <- 1:10 a2 <- 7:16 t.test(a2,a1) getting t(18)=4.43, p=.0003224. Then I try to do it