similar to: disconnect after too many errors?

Hi all, I am experimenting with samba 4. I have existing data on NTFS partition and want to share them via samba. But I have problems with permissions (ACL). There is an option: ntvfs handler that tells how mapping of permissions between unix and windows world shall behave. But there is lack of documentation. So I tried posix, simiple but in either case I wasnot able to write even set permissions

Hi, I'm trying to get a Powerware 5115 to communicate with the NUT via USB under Debian Linux and need help. Here is the output that I see. co-nh5:/tmp/mnt/projects/pwusb/nut-2.4.1# /usr/local/ups/bin/upsdrvctl -u root start Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.4.1 Network UPS Tools - BCMXCP UPS driver 0.21 (2.4.1) USB communication subdriver 0.17 Communications with UPS lost:

Dear all, I have samba3.0.23d running on FreeBSD 6.1. It is running with "security = ADS" and has been functioning correctly from about 3.0.14 to 3.0.22. Since I upgraded to 3.0.23(a|b|c|d) group permissions are not honoured by Samba. For example: drwxrwx--- 107 setup domain admins 3072 Nov 15 19:25 install The user setup is a windows admin user; this user can access this

On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 01:26:15PM -0500, rj coleman wrote: > > > > On Dec 24, 2018, at 10:42 AM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: > > > >> On 12/24/18 7:21 AM, vsnsdualce at memeware.net wrote: > >> Debian is not ruled by the men who actually write the software, but instead women. > > > > *snip* > > > > Can we

Yesterday I installed pam_shield and followed the testing suggested and thought all was well. today I find that I cannot get to my email account, I can login via ssh okay (uses keys) but su and sudo give segmentation faults. I am guessing due to the pam module causing a problem. As I cannot do remote login as root and sudo and su use pam I appear to have locked myself out. Any words of wisdom

I've seen pam_shield recommended several times for protecting against malicious login attempts; but I'm not quite clear if this requires one to be already running some pam-based software? Also, I'm running shorewall, and would prefer a shorewall based protection, but the advice I read on googling for this seemed excessively complicated. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/

It seems there was some kind of attack against dovecot on my server (CentOS-5.5) with a hundred or so logwatch entries like: ========================================= **Unmatched Entries** dovecot-auth: pam_succeed_if(dovecot:auth): error retrieving information about user admin dovecot-auth: pam_succeed_if(dovecot:auth): error retrieving information about user webmaster

Hello! I made a simple configuration with HTB, 10% http and 90% Video, where http can share the available bandwidth left from video. But :(... i think HTB it''s not very fast and it can''t adapt quickly to the great variation of the MPEG 4 VBR (700M film), and some times it jerks a bit in great variations of bandwidth. I''m making a download to have always 100% bandwidth

I am seeing a problem where users are limited to 6 imap logins total. One of my users has a bunch of phones and computers, and wants them all on at the same time. I'm looking through my configuration, and I cannot see a limit on how many times a single user can connect. He is connecting from different IPs. Any ideas? My logs show the following error when they attempt to auth for a 7th

Here's the latest batch of words to get shipped out to Allison Smith. Please submit reasonably small changes to me by tomorrow 10:00 AM Eastern time, and I'll add them. As usual, donations to what will be a ~$110 USD expense would be appreciated, as I am paying for this round out of my pocket. Please send to paypal address "jtodd@loligo.com". I did not include all

I have two instances of dovecot running, one for v6 and one for v4 connections. The only differences in the config files are: --- /etc/dovecot-ip6.conf Wed Aug 18 11:15:43 2004 +++ /etc/dovecot-ip4.conf Wed Aug 18 11:09:17 2004 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ # *** NOTE *** Some values HAVE been changed for OpenBSD use. # Base directory where to store runtime data. -base_dir = /var/dovecot-v6/

I was flipping through the code recently and noticed that we still have the double whammy of allocating dir entry positions with parent_dir->counter++ and that weird setting of f_pos to 2^31-1. So after enough creates (and deletes :)) in a directory we end up with an entry item whose key is past that value. f_pos gets rewound instead of being set to that magical EOF. readdir() gets stuck

> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 8:52 AM, David McGuffey > <davidmcguffey at verizon.net> wrote: > > This is my first post here on the CentOS forums.? I've been running > Fedora > > since FC4, and have been working with RHEL 4 at work.? But this is > my first > > foray into CentOS. > > > > I followed the multimedia guidance on the wiki, and now

Sometimes I'll get an email from a luser which will cause the POP3 daemon to sig11. The email "appears" to be legal. The sig11s only happen on specific emails, and once I remove the emails from the server, the rest can be downloaded. I gzipped the email, and its at http://theapt.org/bogusemail.gz. While this example is international spam, the sig11s happen with real emails too.

I cannot download emails that are larger than 10k. I can download them fine with test32. I am running test35 on OpenBSD/macppc -current. I am downloading the files with Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.9claws on OpenBSD/macppc -current (different machines), over pop3-ssl on IPv6. Problem still occurs with IPv4. On the large files, the download hangs at 4.0k. Multiple small emails work fine. -- A day

Nov 18 17:29:54 gir dovecot: imap-login: Login: jmcvetta [69.106.50.255] Nov 18 17:30:02 gir dovecot: IMAP(jmcvetta): file mail-index-transaction.c: line 247 (mail_index_expunge): assertion failed: (!t->view->external) Nov 18 17:30:02 gir dovecot: child 31094 (imap) killed with signal 6 I saw this in my maillog. I have no idea what that user is doing, but I can harrass him and find out if

I was looking at some new mobile phones, and apparently there is a form of IMAP that is optimized for mobiles called M-IMAP. Its not a rush (since I'm not even sure the phones will be out before Q2), but it'd be a cool thing to have. The spec is in the following PDF. http://www.3gpp2.org/Public_html/specs/X.S0016-311_v1.0_022404.pdf -- Klein bottle for sale ... inquire within.

Had an appointment for these schmoes to come out and install another line. Was supposed to be 8-12. Its now 6PM and not even call. Missed 3 sales calls waiting on these jerks. No wonder customers were jumping ship to Vonage. -- Warm Regards, Lee

I've been blocked twice this morning, and removed myself once - the first time, by the time I got to work and looked at the list, it was already gone. My hosting provider works with those jerks at manitu. I've ranted a number of times over the years at why their method is a *lousy* method for blocking spam in the second decade of the 21st century. Now this: here's another argument as

I get this message, when opening the winecfg, rn@MX:~$ winecfg fixme:wave:ALSA_AddCaptureDevice Add support for DSCapture fixme:wave:ALSA_AddCaptureDevice Add support for DSCapture fixme:mixer:ALSA_MixerInit No master control found, disabling mixer /bin/sh: /usr/bin/esd: not found fixme:jack:JACK_drvLoad error loading the jack library libjack.so, please install this library to use jack --------