similar to: Updated v1.1 and summer plans

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Updated v1.1 and summer plans"

2009 Aug 14
3
SIS Implementation
What would be involved in implementing SIS within Dovecot? A new or modified mailbox format? -- Daniel
2007 May 21
3
Updated v1.1 and summer plans
Webmail.us will be sponsoring my Dovecot development for this summer. Other companies are also welcome to participate in the costs. Participation gets you: - listed in Credits in www.dovecot.org - listed in AUTHORS file - you can tell me how you want to use the feature and I'll make sure that it supports it (within reasonable limits) For already implemented v1.1 features, see
2007 Dec 03
0
De-duplication / Single Instance Storage - WAS: Re: Updated v1.1 and summer plans
On 12/2/2007, Timo Sirainen (tss at iki.fi) wrote: > On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 10:02 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: >> Do you have any idea as to a time frame for when you might be able >> to get to it (Single instance Storage)? Are you thinking post >> v2.0? Even 2.1 or 3.0? > Right now I just want to get v1.1 finished. The main problem with it > is that apparently in
2020 Nov 10
2
Recovering expunged but not purged e-mails from mdbox with zlib compression
Yesterday I had to recover an e-mail which a user had deleted. If I understand this correctly the message was expunged but not purged (doveadm purge had not been run). This e-mail was clearly still in the mdbox stored with zlib compression as I could tell using the doveadm dump command (doveadm dump -t dbox filename). I could however not reveal the e-mail with the normal doveadm fetch -u
2019 Apr 23
4
Sis to deduplicate attachments does not work?
Hi, I use sis to deduplicate attachments, here is my `doveconf -n` ------------ auth_cache_size = 10 M auth_failure_delay = 5 secs auth_mechanisms = plain login auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb auth_ssl_username_from_cert = yes auth_username_format = %Ln default_vsz_limit = 512 M lmtp_rcpt_check_quota = yes mail_attachment_detection_options = add-flags-on-save mail_attachment_dir =
2007 Nov 26
2
v1.1.beta9 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta9.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta9.tar.gz.sig Some changes since beta8: - This release should work perfectly with NFS attribute cache enabled. - Fixes to handling what should be written to cache file and when - Some index handling optimizations - IMAP LIST: dbox and cydir can now return children state Beta9 will
2018 Mar 15
2
Disable SIS
On 14 Mar 2018, 20:42 +0100, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>, wrote: > > > On 14 March 2018 at 21:17 Nick Rosier < nick+dovecot at bunbun.be> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm currently running a small home-server with Dovecot. A long time ago > > I configured it with SIS enabled. I would like to stop using SIS. > > > >
2018 Apr 17
2
Corrupted dbox file around offset= EOF reading msg header
Hello Dovecoters, I am using dovecot-2.2.10-8.el7.x86_64 on RHEL 7.4 When I backup mdboxes (using SIS) using this command doveadm -Dv -o plugin/quota= sync -1f -u user1 at user.com mdbox:/mailbackup/user1 mails get backedup but all m files are not copied. Last file copied is m.4 If I run the command again I get below error I tried with doveadm backup command as well (many times).
2015 Feb 27
4
users of dbox format
I am interested in finding out your experiences with using the dbox format (especially mdbox) if you use this format. I am contemplating changing my maildir setup to mdbox but I still need to make a case for it against maildir which has become a de-facto standard and provides sort of a secure basis in case of software changes. Your input will be appreciated. -- Andreas Kasenides Senior IT
2018 Mar 14
4
Disable SIS
Hi, I'm currently running a small home-server with Dovecot. A long time ago I configured it with SIS enabled. I would like to stop using SIS. If I remove sis from mail_attachment_fs will the old mails that are stored in SIS-storage still be accessible? How can I convert all mailboxes to stop using SIS and store attachments back in the mails? Rgds, N.
2018 Apr 20
1
maildir vs dbox?
I'm facing some issues on mdbox based backups. Backups are failing with dbox corruption messages. SiS is the greatest advantage though. However backups integrity is very important. If SiS/Deduplication is not a requirement stick to Maildir. Regards DP -----Original Message----- From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Gedalya Sent: 20 April 2018 08:19 To: dovecot at
2011 Feb 16
2
Regenerating mdbox/sis
It's apparent I have some level of corruption in my mailboxes - something to do with the combination of mdbox, sis, and zlib. I should note that I know I have a mix of compressed and raw messages - if that makes any difference in identifying the problems. I think I need to somehow regenerate the mailboxes with issues. Is there a suggestion for how to accomplish this? Should I perhaps use
2020 Nov 10
2
Recovering expunged but not purged e-mails from mdbox with zlib compression
> On 10/11/2020 20:07 Daniel Sch?tze <dms at cwa.uk.com> wrote: > > > Dear Aki > Thank you. Unfortunately I'm struggling to get the right syntax for this as it looks like someone else was here too > https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2018-July/112441.html > The location in my dovecot.conf is > >
2010 Sep 16
3
Moving from MBOX to Maildir or DBox ?
Hello Actually we use MBOX format for all our IMAP access but users complain they cannot create subfolders in imap folders, of course they cannot because of MBOX format ... I need gurus advices on changing mailbox format Maildir of Dbox ? What would be the safest way to go ? Note : we extensively use Thunderbird here. Thanks
2018 Apr 20
2
maildir vs dbox?
Hello, I've got a Dovecot virtual email setup using maildir as the mailbox format. I am wondering from others who have chosen dbox a comparison between maildir and dbox or those who have migrated from one format to another. I am wondering if changing to dbox would be beneficial? Thanks. Dave.
2007 Aug 07
1
v1.1.alpha2 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha2.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha2.tar.gz.sig Hopefully the next release can be v1.1.beta1. I'm not aware of any major problems and I think I'm pretty much done with new features (except for dbox). The largest changes since alpha1: * Removed THREAD indexing. It's a bit buggy and I think
2018 Aug 29
2
where are stored attachments
Based on this you are not using SIS, so I wonder if those are some old emails when you were using SIS? Can you provide an example corpus of such mail? You can use e.g. https://www.dovecot.org/tools/dbox-anonymize.pl https://www.dovecot.org/tools/maildir-obfuscate.pl https://www.dovecot.org/tools/mbox-anonymize.pl https://www.dovecot.org/tools/mdbox-obfuscate.pl to obfuscate the mail. Aki On
2010 Nov 02
1
mdbox - how do I fix corrupted indexes?
I am unable top pop mail from my server, using mdbox: Nov 02 16:35:08 pop3-login: Info: Login: user=<wash at domain.co.ke>, method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.40.79, lip=192.168.40.252, mpid=36052 Nov 02 16:35:09 pop3(wash at domain.co.ke): Error: Corrupted dbox file /var/spool/virtual/domain.co.ke/wash/mdbox/storage/m.1 (around offset=1941): Ex t refs metadata corrupted: 3861 783856
2011 Mar 28
1
SiS: Attachment file larger than expected
I recently set up SiS and imported a large chunk of mail. I've noticed one or two instances of this in the logs: Mar 28 09:03:50 mail dovecot: imap(xxx at yyy.zz): Error: Attachment file /mailstore/attachments/ce/73/ce737a45fe07495e2ae6466f9e381a30d5ec300406f11269d79bd5608cc0c922-822b3d2df67f8e4d7f5000009501e12a larger than expected (252218) Mar 28 14:52:34 mail dovecot: pop3(zzz at xxx.yy):
2007 Sep 08
3
v1.1.alpha4 released / about dbox
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha4.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha4.tar.gz.sig Lots of fixes since alpha3. Also includes the dbox rewrite. Currently dbox works properly only in one-message-per-file mode. I'm not actually even sure how good idea it would be to use it with multiple-messages-per-file mode. But I guess it won't hurt to