similar to: Need to upgrade to latest samba -> Any caveats?"

Are updating a DC or a member ? On 26 Aug 2024 at 14:45 +0100, Marco Shmerykowsky PE via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>, wrote: > I need to upgrade from Debian bullseye to > Debian Bookworm. I also need to bring samba > up from 4.17.12 to I guess the 4.20 series. > > Typically I haven't had problems in doing upgrades > and I haven't spotted anything in the release

both -- Marco On 8/26/2024 10:35 AM, Luis Peromarta via samba wrote: > Are updating a DC or a member ? > On 26 Aug 2024 at 14:45 +0100, Marco Shmerykowsky PE via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>, wrote: >> I need to upgrade from Debian bullseye to >> Debian Bookworm. I also need to bring samba >> up from 4.17.12 to I guess the 4.20 series. >> >>

Op 18-10-2023 om 11:32 schreef Ingo Asche via samba: > Hi Michael, > > thanks for the info - and your work... > > As Bookworm for Raspberry isn't that far away, I can live with that. > This is "just" my playground... I have recently migrated my Raspberry Pi machines from Raspbian to Debian bookworm. It has several advantages: - All Debian packages are

Hi Michael, thanks for the info - and your work... As Bookworm for Raspberry isn't that far away, I can live with that. This is "just" my playground... Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Michael Tokarev via samba schrieb am 18.10.2023 um 09:17: > 16.10.2023 15:50, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> short question: will the

16.10.2023 15:50, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi Michael, > > short question: will the Bullseye-Backports getting 4.17.12, too? > > I saw, Bookworm is already updated... Since oldstable-bpo archive in debian is always subject to manual backports-policy processing (all uploads are processed manually), I don't push stuff to oldstable-bpo often. On the other hand, this

Am 04.07.2024 um 21:00 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 20:27:37 +0200 > Paul Leiber via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Dear Samba list, >> >> I have a Samba instance running as an ad-dc on debian bullseye. > > I suggest you upgrade, bullseye goes EOL in three weeks. Aww, my system is already on bookworm, not on bullseye.

Hi Michael, short question: will the Bullseye-Backports getting 4.17.12, too? I saw, Bookworm is already updated... -- Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama

On 30-04-2023 10:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will >>> be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released,

Replying here as well, since this is a frequent question. I uploaded the updated samba packages to the official debian archives in parallel with updating my repository - exactly the same source packages as are used to build samba for my repository. 4.18 should already be available on sid/unstable, I think. In trixie/testing it will migrate within 5 days if nothing other breaks. Updated bookworm

On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be >> the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. >> Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba

Hi Peter, Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: > Hi folks, > > I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be > the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. > Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba backports > for Bookworm? > > I saw a post from Michael Tokarev in this list a

Just upgraded a file server to Samba 4.17.9-Debian and Bullseye (Debian 11). Noticed that am now getting a number of errors in the smbd log: 'chdir_current_service: vfs_Chfir (a-directory) failed. Permission Denied uid=................ The uid on all the entries seems to correspond to a computer/machine account if I look it up with 'wbinfo --uid-info'. Thoughts? Thank you

30.04.2023 11:20, Rowland Penny via samba ?????: .. > There is a big problem with this, bookworm hasn't been released yet and as far as I can see, there isn't a bookworm-backports yet. > The only mention of Samba 4.18 that I can see in Debian is in experimental, a long way from any backports. No, there's no long way to bookworm-backports. I use experimental just because debian

Hi folks, I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba backports for Bookworm? I saw a post from Michael Tokarev in this list a while ago, that there probably wont be a Samba 4.18 for Debian Bullseye. I also saw another post about

On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 20:27:37 +0200 Paul Leiber via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Dear Samba list, > > I have a Samba instance running as an ad-dc on debian bullseye. I suggest you upgrade, bullseye goes EOL in three weeks. > Some > time ago, I changed the standard installation to backports with > > apt -t bullseye-backports install samba I normally

On Mon, 2023-05-22 at 15:54:51 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > gene heskett <gheskett at shentel.net> writes: > > > > Which file in the nut I pulled a month ago, should I start with to get > > > > the new version actually running? I still get - -V=2.7.4 > > > On 5/22/23 07:13, Greg Troxel wrote: > > > It is likely that you have

On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > Hi Yvan, > > Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I need > to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then getting > the newest Samba packages from Bookworm backports. It's just a little > over a month away, so there is ample time for planning upgrades. > > Best

On 06/06/2023 10:51, Lorenzo Milesi via samba wrote: > >> As I understand it, you only need Michael's repo for Ubuntu, The Debian >> backport repo gets updated with the same Samba packages as his repo (or >> is it the other way around ?). He is the Debian Samba maintainer. > > With the repos you can select several minor versions (from 4.16 to .18), while backports

Hello mjt, I can only speak for myself: For bigger upgrades (e. g. samba 4.19 -> 4.20) Im manually updating a few servers and check if everything works. For smaller updates (e. g. 4.20.1 -> 4.20.2) Im using saltstack to automate updating the servers. It suppresses these messages and this is fine in 99% of all cases because a minor update is not supposed to change much (e. g. split a

Hello Rowland, >> >> I guess this is because this specific machine has an old samba >> >> version (4.6.4) which lacks the necessary functions. >> >> >> >> What are my options now? >> >> a) update Samba on the old machine to a current version? (not >> >> preferred) >> > Excelent idea. Try: >> >>