similar to: The case of the disappearing INBOX's - upgrade to 1.1.1 from 1.0.7 and based on Email client type

Hi, Is there an IMAP performance difference using Maildir between using version 3 and version 1 of the dovecot-uidlist (either dovecot 1.0.7 or 1.1.2)? It isn't entirely clear to me there is any difference as the filename may contain the size/vsize information. The servers will eventually be running 1.1.2 with the maildir_copy_preserve_filename turned on. I'm doing a batch migration

Hi, I've just completed a migration from Courier to a Dovecot 1.0.7 (patched RHE 5) which is working great, except for this weirdness of an issue that is impacting a handful of users. My question is that will turning off maildir_copy_preserve_filename help or hurt in a situation where there are multiple servers with their own local INDEX files (uidlist is shared)? The problem is that a

Hi, Is there a way to associate a user's the login (imap-login) process with the user's 'imap [' process? We are trying to lock down an issue to make sure we full understand it. /proc and shared memory tools weren't particular useful. Just for context, we are having an intermittent locking index cache locking issue that appears to impact only a subset of our users. The

Hi, Up until yesterday, our environment which consists an NFS maildir file store with multiple front end servers, was working fine. We've verified that the server clocks and machines clocks are in sync. Starting yesterday afternoon, We are getting ~850 log entries of the form 'Timeout while waiting for lock for transaction log files' or 'Our dotlock file was modified,

Hi, I've upgraded from 1.0.7 to 1.1.3. When I did this, my Thunderbird lost its brain and did not show some subscribed folders. squirrelmail also seemed to have issues. Applemail and mutt were fine. The configuration output is below. Hopefully this is just me and just random bizarreness. There wasn't a problem in 1.0.7 but I could have been caught in mid-upgrade. Thunderbird did not

On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 17:56:06 -0700 ToddAndMargo via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > The cure was to add to smb.conf > > ; To operate with XP, add the following to the [global] section: > ; lanman auth = yes > ; ntlm auth = yes > lanman auth = yes > ntlm auth = yes > > Sorry, but you seem to have fixed the wrong thing ;-) Did you miss

On 08/20/2017 02:14 AM, ToddAndMargo via samba wrote: > On 08/20/2017 01:20 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 17:56:06 -0700 >> ToddAndMargo via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> The cure was to add to smb.conf >>> >>> ; To operate with XP, add the following to the [global] section: >>> ; lanman

Am 09.06.2017 um 19:55 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> Can anybody please help me, even by simply giving me some hints to >> point me in the right direction to do a deeper investigation? >> >> Thank you very, very much in advance, >> best regards > > Try adding 'ntlm auth = yes' to smb.conf and restart Samba. > It was changed from 'yes'

Am 2017-11-11 um 13:36 schrieb Rowland Penny: > As far as I am aware, 'net use' sends the password unencrypted, so if > someone is trying to 'sniff' the password, they will get it, but then > if the password is stored in the bat file unencrypted and anybody can > read the bat file, they wont need to 'sniff' the password. Yes, we know ;-) The thin client with

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:27:29 -0700 ToddAndMargo via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Dear list, > > Help! > > I just upgrade a samba server. > > Server: > Fedora 26 > samba-4.6.8-0.fc26.x86_64 > > Workstations (5 of them): > XP Pro SP3 > > The old server was set up as a Domain controller. I copied the > smb.conf over to

On Sat, 11 Nov 2017 11:02:31 +0100 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > A customer asked me if someone would be able to sniff (wireshark or > something like that) a password if plugging into the same switch as > their samba server. > > They use a desktop icon pointing at a plain old bat-file containing a > "net

On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 2017-11-11 um 13:36 schrieb Rowland Penny: > > > As far as I am aware, 'net use' sends the password unencrypted, so if > > someone is trying to 'sniff' the password, they will get it, but then > > if the password is stored in the bat file

On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:06:01 +0100 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> You can make XP use NTLMv2, see here: > >> > >> https://www.imss.caltech.edu/node/396 > > Did these changes on the 2 VMs and rebooted. > > For sure I also have to remove stuff from smb.conf, I run these > non-default settings for

On Sat, 11 Aug 2018 16:08:39 +0200 Andrzej Gryko via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for my english. > I configured Samba as DC and when I use win 10, everything is ok, but > win xp dosn't attach disks. When I browse \\dc.gryko.org.local, xp > can see disks, but dosn't attach them while logging in. Win 10 does. > > My smb.conf: >

I am running dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Squeeze 64 bit, config information at the end of the email. I am working on a Kerberos/GSSAPI based setup that requires cross-realm authentication. I have regular GSSAPI working, I can log in using pam_krb5 with password based logins or with the GSSAPI support when using a kerberos ticket in the default realm. However when I attempt to authenticate using

I did, what you say, but xp still doesn't attach disks while logging in. Unfortunetelly I must make xp to work with Samba, because some customers still using xp. Regards Andrzej sob., 11 sie 2018 o 16:57 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> napisał(a): > On Sat, 11 Aug 2018 16:08:39 +0200 > Andrzej Gryko via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >

On 09/30/2017 12:58 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:27:29 -0700 > ToddAndMargo via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Dear list, >> >> Help! >> >> I just upgrade a samba server. >> >> Server: >> Fedora 26 >> samba-4.6.8-0.fc26.x86_64 >> >> Workstations (5 of them):

Hi, The following discussion was posted to comp.security.ssh however, it seems that my problems may be a bug in SSH. Could someone please indicate whether there is a bug fix, or perhaps whether I should go back a version or so. In summary: - Win98 machine (client) - OpenSSH as packaged with Cygwin tools 1.1.8 (openssh-2.5.2p2-3) - Connecting to a Sun running Solaris. ssh: SSH Secure Shell

> Date: 30 Nov 1998 20:22:27 GMT > From: mathog@seqaxp.bio.caltech.edu > To: mlist-samba@nntp-server.caltech.edu > Subject: W95/98 connect to any SMB share as another user? > Message-ID: <73uuq3$s7j@gap.cco.caltech.edu> > > map H: as \\machine1\share1 as username=John, password=JohnsPassword map > M: as \\machine2\share2 as username=Jane, password=JanesPassword >

On 09/30/2017 12:58 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > I understand that you have to use XP, but you don't have to use NTLM, > haven't you heard of 'wanacry' ? > Go here and read it:http://www.imss.caltech.edu/node/396 WannaCry did not infect XP or for that matter, Windows Nein, oops, Ten. Doesn't mean it couldn't if altered to do so: Reference: