similar to: Windows 11 logon issue

On Sun, 7 Jul 2024 00:55:20 +0100 Jonathan Hunter via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I recently noticed that two separate Windows 11 machines joined to my > domain are not letting me log in to them as a domain user. In the > Windows Security event log I can see 'Audit Failure' - 'An account > failed to log on'. Details shown are:

Hi I have a Samba AD-DC (on ubuntu) and I've created a user on it the DC called nileadmin. On the DC, 'pdbedit -w nileadmin' finds the entry and returns nileadmin:4294967295:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:6590718693B2E602D30F67B848E08AE9:[U ]:LCT-678A9897: I've joined a member (also a ubuntu host running samba) to the domain. The join is successful. But when I run the

On 22.01.2025 16:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:46:44 +0200 > Virgo P?rna via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> After enabling auth_audit logging at samba, there are lot of messages >> with status NT_STATUS_TIME_DIFFERENCE_AT_DC >> But clock is synced and same in workstation and in server... >> > > From the

It is quite possible, that NT_STATUS_TIME_DIFFERENCE_AT_DC is some kind of red herring. I found thread from July, where it was suggested, that "Samba seems to return it as an error code as a backstop". I did add log level = 10 with custom IP based filename to get additional logs. But it seems, that with log level = 1 auth_audit:5@/var/log/samba/auth_audit.log in main config... auth

Losing my mind again ;-) A Ricoh MPC-3003 doesn't store scans anymore: [2025/04/09 14:12:32.414091, 2] source3/auth/auth.c:353(auth_check_ntlm_password) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [scanner] -> [scanner] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD, authoritative=1 [2025/04/09 14:12:32.414315, 2] auth/auth_log.c:858(log_authentication_event_human_readable) Auth:

On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 14:21:02 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Losing my mind again ;-) > > A Ricoh MPC-3003 doesn't store scans anymore: > > [2025/04/09 14:12:32.414091, 2] > source3/auth/auth.c:353(auth_check_ntlm_password) > check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [scanner] -> > [scanner]

After enabling auth_audit logging at samba, there are lot of messages with status NT_STATUS_TIME_DIFFERENCE_AT_DC But clock is synced and same in workstation and in server... -- Virgo P?rna virgo.parna at mail.ee

On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:46:44 +0200 Virgo P?rna via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > After enabling auth_audit logging at samba, there are lot of messages > with status NT_STATUS_TIME_DIFFERENCE_AT_DC > But clock is synced and same in workstation and in server... > From the looks of it, your workstation thinks differently, could it be a timezone problem ? If I run

Op 25-11-2024 om 17:06 schreef Hoefle, Marco (Avnet Silica): > >>Op 25-11-2024 om 11:57 schreef Rowland Penny via samba: > >>> On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:44:28 +0100 > >>> Kees van Vloten via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Op 25-11-2024 om 11:35 schreef Rowland Penny via samba: > >>>>> On Mon, 25

Hi, We've been having an intermittent issue with pam_winbind on Ubuntu 24.04. The test case we have to demonstrate this is to run this loop after logging in as a domain user: $ while sleep 1 ; do sudo -k ; sudo -K ; date ; echo "password" | sudo -S /bin/echo "sudo success" || break ; done The loop will run successfully, sometimes for 50+ iterations but eventually [sudo]

Egad, not again with Broadvoice! Anyhow, I recently installed AAH and configured my TDM11B and got that and some SIP phones working. I still have some issues to work out, etc, but my current problem is Broadvoice. I have checked out all of the online resources, including the recent list exchange about the recent changes made by Broadvoice. However, the one thing I have found to be consitent in

>>>>> On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:44:28 +0100 >>>>> Kees van Vloten via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>?wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Op 25-11-2024 om 11:35 schreef Rowland Penny via samba: >>>>>>> On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:48:19 +0000 >>>>>>> "Hoefle, Marco \(Avnet Silica\) via samba" <samba

Op 04-12-2024 om 16:04 schreef Hoefle, Marco (Avnet Silica): >>>>>> On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 11:44:28 +0100 >>>>>> Kees van Vloten via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>?wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Op 25-11-2024 om 11:35 schreef Rowland Penny via samba: >>>>>>>> On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:48:19 +0000

>From somewhere in Cyberspace to all points on the compass its the On Computers Radio Show. Sunday's show will be all tech talk with the team. Peter Kastner will start off the show by talking about this week's hot news stories then the gang will continue on with tech talk. During the second hour, we will be joined by Kerry Garrison of the <http://geekgazette.com/> Geek Gazette

Hello All, Please help.. I can not join an additional new samba dc ver. 4.19.5 to an existing samba Ad version 4.19.5 functional level 2008 R2. Last week I successfully demote an offline dc3 and move the fsmo role to dc4. The command i used to join: it at dc6:~$ sudo samba-tool domain join NICHO.COM DC -UAdministrator at NICHO.COM --option='idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes'

On Fri, 2023-10-27 at 10:44 +0200, Kees van Vloten wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > > Op 27-10-2023 om 02:22 schreef Andrew > Bartlett: > > > > > > > I'm sorry to say that from here you really need to work > > closely with a Samba developer (eg via a commercial support > > provider) or do a deep

Hi Andrew, Op 27-10-2023 om 02:22 schreef Andrew Bartlett: > I'm sorry to say that from here you really need to work closely with a > Samba developer (eg via a commercial support provider) or do a deep > dive into debugging yourself. > > Ideally if you have time, do a git bisect between the last known > working version and the first failing one. ?That may find the >

Hi We've recently set up and are using with success 1.0.7 using a Junghanns quadbri card to BRI ISDN, and Firefly with IAX2 protocol as softphones Works very well, however we're getting cases where sometimes the call just drops. >From setting more verbose modes we get a log which is shown below. The problem seems to be the maxretries message which comes from chan_iax2. We are using

El 07/04/15 a las 17:38, Alex Villac??s Lasso escribi?: > I am trying to collect enough information about an problem a client is having with its asterisk 11.17.0 x86_64. This issue was observed before in 1.8.20, and we upgraded to 11.15.0 and then to 11.17.0 with no solution. > > Background: this client is a telemarketing call-center that generates outgoing calls with close to a hundred

Outbound calls on my Telus PRI aren't taking the Name portion of the callerID. I've looked at the logs, and it is being set (see below), but the PRI debug output doesn't show the name being sent anywhere. As a result, received calls always display from Unknown (or just the number). Is there some config that I've missed somewhere? I'm running NI-1 (Telus says NI-2 doesn't