similar to: v1.2.rc2 released

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/rc/dovecot-2.0.rc2.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/rc/dovecot-2.0.rc2.tar.gz.sig Largest fixes since rc1: - Fixed a crash with empty mail_plugins - Fixed sharing INBOX to other users - mdbox: Rebuilding storage was broken in rc1 - dsync was broken for remote syncs in rc1 - director+LMTP proxy wasn't working

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/rc/dovecot-2.0.rc2.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/rc/dovecot-2.0.rc2.tar.gz.sig Largest fixes since rc1: - Fixed a crash with empty mail_plugins - Fixed sharing INBOX to other users - mdbox: Rebuilding storage was broken in rc1 - dsync was broken for remote syncs in rc1 - director+LMTP proxy wasn't working

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc2.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc2.tar.gz.sig Changes since rc1: * mail_extra_groups setting was commonly used insecurely. This setting is now deprecated. Most users should switch to using mail_privileged_group setting, but if you really need the old functionality use mail_access_groups instead. + Expire plugin

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc2.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc2.tar.gz.sig Changes since rc1: * mail_extra_groups setting was commonly used insecurely. This setting is now deprecated. Most users should switch to using mail_privileged_group setting, but if you really need the old functionality use mail_access_groups instead. + Expire plugin

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc1.tar.gz.sig I think it's time to get v1.2.0 out soon. Shared mailbox code is beginning to look like it's working and other features should work fine also. I don't really see any reasons to delay it, so please start testing and let's get the last bugs found and fixed quickly.

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc1.tar.gz.sig I think it's time to get v1.2.0 out soon. Shared mailbox code is beginning to look like it's working and other features should work fine also. I don't really see any reasons to delay it, so please start testing and let's get the last bugs found and fixed quickly.

Hi, I've tagged the 8.0.1-rc2 release, testers please begin testing and upload your binaries. There are still a few more bug fixes that I need to merge, so I'm planning to do one more release candidate before 8.0.1-final. -Tom

On 06/05/2018 10:47 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 4 Jun 2018, at 18:01, Tom Stellard via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> The 6.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged. Testers may begin testing and >> reporting results. > > Built for FreeBSD 10, tested and uploaded: > > SHA256 (clang+llvm-6.0.1-rc2-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz)

Hello everybody, when I upgraded from RC1 to RC2 I didn't had any audio between my ATA286 and H323 EP (my post from 13/08/04) I checked further and discover that problem is with ATA286 who is unable to call. I always get an 404 error. Coming back to RC1 everything works fine again. I tried to modify my dtmfmode from rfc2833 to info but in change nothing. Local call to asterisk are

Dear testers, 7.0.0-rc2 was just tagged (from branch revision r340437). There have been a bunch of merges since rc1, and hopefully many of the issues with the previous candidate are fixed in this one. Please run the test script, share the results, and upload binaries. I will publish source tarballs, docs, and binaries on the web page once they're ready. Thanks, Hans

Files encoded with rc2 (comes from the latest RPM available at vorbis.com) seems to be unreadable for ogg123 < rc2 version (for example, beta4) Is that normal ? Will this file be readable with ogg123 >= rc2 ? Are plugins for windows player updated, can they read ogg files encoded with ogg123 rc2 ? --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage:

Hi, I've fixed the version numbering and tagged 5.0.2-rc2. Testers can begin testing. -Tom

Hi, The 7.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged and is ready for testing. I forgot to bump the version number to 7.0.1 before I tagged -rc1, which is why we are now on -rc2. Remember, you can continue to submit merge requests up until Nov, 21, so keep testing and submitting fixes. Thanks, Tom

Hi, There was one problem in -rc1, so we had to do another release candidate. -rc2 has now been tagged and is ready for testing. -Tom

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.13.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.13.tar.gz.sig http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta3.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta3.tar.gz.sig Looks like Friday the 13th isn't the best day to make releases. :) These releases fix two bad bugs in v1.1.12. - v1.1.12's MAILBOXDIR changes broke

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.13.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.13.tar.gz.sig http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta3.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta3.tar.gz.sig Looks like Friday the 13th isn't the best day to make releases. :) These releases fix two bad bugs in v1.1.12. - v1.1.12's MAILBOXDIR changes broke

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta4.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta4.tar.gz.sig This release fixes a memory corruption bug related to MODSEQ handling in earlier v1.2 releases. Memory corruption means that it's a security bug and possibly exploitable. MODSEQ code is new in v1.2, so v1.1 and older releases are not affected. Other than that, there

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta4.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/beta/dovecot-1.2.beta4.tar.gz.sig This release fixes a memory corruption bug related to MODSEQ handling in earlier v1.2 releases. Memory corruption means that it's a security bug and possibly exploitable. MODSEQ code is new in v1.2, so v1.1 and older releases are not affected. Other than that, there

On 03/29/2018 08:09 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > Hi, > > I've fixed the version numbering and tagged 5.0.2-rc2. Testers can > begin testing. > So far, I've only received 5.0.2-rc2 binaries from 2 testers. I am guessing this is due to the mix up with -rc1 and the fact that we don't normally do X.Y.2 releases. If you would like to test this release

> > > clang+llvm-3.6.0-rc2-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz > > > All clear for default options. > > > Still running for the other configs. > > > > I just had to kill Searching-dbl.simple and Packing-dbl.simple for the > > mips32 config which were at 65hrs and 15hrs real time respectively. This is > > far in excess of the 15,000s time limit that's