similar to: bind9 failure when using dlz_bind

Version 4.0.0alpha18-GIT-e75c436 Ubuntu 11.10 Built now with make clean ./configure.developer make make install samba -i -d3 gives this: ldb: unable to stat module ${PREFIX}/modules/ldb : No such file or directory ldb_wrap open of privilege.ldb samba: using 'standard' process model Unknown process model 'standard' my $PREFIX should be /usr/local/samba I think. The path is

Hi, I have 2 self compiled samba 4 DCs running 4.7.7 on Centos 7.5. One of them is operating normally. On the other DC bind will not start. I turned up debugging on dlz_bind as per https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#Debugging_the_BIND9_DLZ_Module When I try to start named I get the following in the logs: May 10 13:19:44 vdc2 named[23773]: starting BIND

I''m doing a request from a Rails app to another Rails app with ActiveResource. When the format on ActiveResource is XML: Content.find(:all)[0,2].map(&:attributes) => [ {"updated_at"=>Mon Apr 27 15:04:32 UTC 2009, "url"=>"www.google.com", "id"=>1, "created_at"=>Mon Apr 27 15:04:32 UTC 2009},

One of my servers is using ISO datetime formats (2011-02-27T15:22:15.519857-05:00) in the logs the rest use the default redhat/CentOS format (Feb 27 15:10:21). After a couple of hours searching google I cannot find where this is defined. I know I changed it some months ago as an experiment but forgotten where this was done. the ISO format breaks logwatch - thus I need to revert. TIA

Hi list, I would like to now what is the sense of such type of entry in security.log [2019-09-27 15:12:24] SECURITY[26964] res_security_log.c: SecurityEvent="ChallengeSent",EventTV="2019-09-27T15:12:24.181+0200",Severity="Informational",Servic e="PJSIP",EventVersion="1",AccountID="<unknown>",

Le 30/09/2019 à 11:45, Joshua C. Colp a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019, at 11:31 AM, Administrator TOOTAI wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> I would like to now what is the sense of such type of entry in security.log >> >> [2019-09-27 15:12:24] SECURITY[26964] res_security_log.c: >>

I"m seeing this as well, after I updated my CentOS 7 hosts to the latest release. Something seems to have broken! On 10 May 2018 at 17:54, Tom Diehl via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I have 2 self compiled samba 4 DCs running 4.7.7 on Centos 7.5. One of them > is operating normally. On the other DC bind will not start. I turned up > debugging on

Hi Stefan, I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the bullseye-backports. I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors. As like 9.16 I use the "dlz_bind9_18.so" entry in named.conf. If you need further information to compare just ask. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um

Am 16.01.23 um 20:35 schrieb Ingo Asche via samba: > Hi Stefan, > > I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the > bullseye-backports. > > I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors. > On the first DC it's running like I expacted, but on the second one I'm having the provlem. > As like 9.16 I use the

Not sure if this library is provided by samba team or isc, but I can no longer start my named service if I connect it with samba. brief history: I am having problems with named hanging, isc says step1 is to upgrade to the latest bind.? As soon as I upgrade to latest bind, it wont start.? Now the first step is to figure out which mailing list to talk to ?syslog: Apr 30 07:43:02 nc1

Hi Trying to set up a one way trust between a 2008 Active Directory domain and a Samba 3.5.9 server which is configured as a PDC. There is already an existing trust between AD and an NT4 domain so AD has been configured to support NTLM authentication (see below for full details). With no domain trust, using smbclient either anonymously or with a valid user on the DC (e.g. Administrator)

On 2023-05-18 11:24 p.m., Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On 19/05/2023 03:57, Steven Monai via samba wrote: >> To be concrete: What do you recommend should be the contents of the >> respective /etc/resolv.conf files in my test? > In resolv.conf, 'domain' and 'search' are mutually exclusive and the > last one wins, as you need 'search', I would

Ah, ok, just saw it. Sorry, I missed that. I can only add then, all three DC's in my little net are installed with bind 9.18 and working all the same without errors. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Stefan Kania via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um 20:47: > > > Am 16.01.23 um 20:35 schrieb Ingo Asche via samba: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> I have exact that running:

On 16/01/2023 18:56, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 16/01/2023 18:27, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> >> >> Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> >>> >>> On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >>>> Hi to all, >>>> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.20 release series. Changes since 4.20.1 -------------------- o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15662: vfs_widelinks with DFS shares breaks case insensitivity. o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 13213: Samba build is not reproducible. ?? * BUG

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.20 release series. Changes since 4.20.1 -------------------- o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15662: vfs_widelinks with DFS shares breaks case insensitivity. o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 13213: Samba build is not reproducible. ?? * BUG

On 19/05/2023 03:57, Steven Monai via samba wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > On 2023-05-18 12:29 a.m., Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > >> On 18/05/2023 04:31, Steven Monai via samba wrote: > >>> Successfully obtained Kerberos ticket to DNS/dc33.ttwo.ad.example.org >>> as DC34$ >> >> That's one misconfiguration you probably have there,

Hello, I am testing Samba (v.4.17.8) in Debian 12 ("Bookworm") for use on two DCs (as separate VMs) in a new AD domain. "dc33" (IP: 10.150.10.33) is the first DC in the new domain ("ttwo.ad.example.org"), provisioned via 'samba-tool domain provision DC'. "dc34" (IP: 10.150.10.34) is the second DC, joined to the domain via 'samba-tool domain

On 20/05/2023 04:44, Steven Monai via samba wrote: > Thanks. With this new info, It isn't new, it is in the wiki. > I re-ran my test setup from the beginning: > destroyed and reprovisioned the VMs dc33 and dc34 running Debian 12; > provisioned a new AD domain on dc33 with 'samba-tool domain provision > DC'; and then joined dc34 as a DC with 'samba-tool domain

Hallo lovely samba-people, did something change in regards to the online AD Backup in 4.20? We're using this CLI command to create a backup of our domain: ??? /usr/bin/samba-tool domain backup online --targetdir="/my/path" --server="rad-2.ad.ellerhold.lan" --use-krb5-ccache="/opt/samba-ad-backup/ad-backup.krb5cc" -N This ran successfully on a member server